closeupready
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-22-05 02:18 PM
Original message |
Is there a Gay Canon, both fiction and non-fiction? |
|
And if so, which books would be on it? Since college, I haven't kept up on much of what's going on as far as academic studies or even literature - I see a lot of fluff when I look at the gay and lesbian sections of bookstores and it's possible that the gay "Canon" (if there is such a thing) hasn't changed much since then, but just curious what anybody else thinks or is reading now. Thanks.
|
xchrom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-22-05 02:24 PM
Response to Original message |
1. the gay canon would be those authors |
|
who also occupy major staus in the straight canon.
i.e. whitman, wolf, etc.
it probably takes a generation before someone's work begins to elevate to canon status -- so you have to read everything -- and weed out the trash -- i.e. i like irish author jamie o'neil right now and i will watching to see what happens to his work.
|
intheflow
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-22-05 02:24 PM
Response to Original message |
2. I think "Rubyfruit Jungle" belongs in a gay canon. |
|
Maybe "The Laramie Project," too. For non-fiction, how about Jeff Lutes booklet A False Focus on My Family?
|
bammertheblue
(391 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-22-05 03:03 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
|
Edited on Thu Dec-22-05 03:03 PM by bammertheblue
I'd never read that before, and I just downloaded it and read it and it blew my mind. Aside from all the studies that show Focus on the Family is completely full of shit (which I knew, obviously), it's amazing to me that the author is so forgiving to all the idiots like Dobson. I don't think I could do that- when I hear about people who are so bigoted like that I just want to scream at them.
|
kweerwolf
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-22-05 04:56 PM
Response to Original message |
4. The actually is a book called "The Gay Canon" |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Tue Apr 30th 2024, 12:04 AM
Response to Original message |