Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Kevin McCullough..Anti-Gay Marriage pundant. Townhall.com

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » GLBT Donate to DU
 
and-justice-for-all Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-02-06 01:57 PM
Original message
Kevin McCullough..Anti-Gay Marriage pundant. Townhall.com
On TOWNHALL.com, they have Kevin McCullough. A strong Anti-Gay spokes men whom I have been exchanging emails with in the issue of Gay MArriage, here is what has been transversed, the only message I dont have is the first one I sent.

rom: "Kevin McCullough" <kmc@nycradio.com>
To: And Justice for all
Subject: Re: Townhall.com Columnist Mail for Kevin McCullough: Gay Marriage
Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2006 08:12:28 -0500

Stop lying RS,

I have been in a "same-sex" relationship for 14 years, make 60k plus a year, own a home, have four vehicals and above average education. Yet, we can not marry so all those assests remain with myself or him in the unfortunate event that results in the loss of one of our lives.


Write a will, those assets will only "remain" with you, him, "whoever" only because you did not take the time to do what was necessary to secure them. (WHICH YOU CAN ALREADY LEGALLY DO UNDER THE LAW.)

Two people and a lawyer can arrange anything - hospital visitation, determination of assets, blah, blah, blah - YOU CAN ALREADY DO IT. And if you don't its simply because you did not take the intiative to.

Now stop fibbing, it makes your argument look desperate.
~KMC

To: <kmc@nycradio.com>
Sent: Monday, October 30, 2006 8:38 PM
Subject: Re: Townhall.com Columnist Mail for Kevin McCullough: Gay Marriage


Im not the one telling tall Tales..

From: "Kevin McCullough" <kmc@nycradio.com>
To: And Justice for all
Subject: Re: Townhall.com Columnist Mail for Kevin McCullough: Gay Marriage
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 06:50:09 -0500

Well since you can already care for all the issues you mentioned - you in fact - are..

To: <kmc@nycradio.com>
Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2006 12:21 PM
Subject: Re: Townhall.com Columnist Mail for Kevin McCullough: Gay Marriage


I disagree,

And I am not a liar, thats a Republican trait.

How you read it that I must be telling tall tales because I do not think its the right of the so called "morals and values" group to dictate over a minority class, is ignorant on your part.

I know you knew, without a doubt, that two people you do not even know who decided to have ritual service or not, would not directly effect you, in any way shape or form. Mainly because its none of your business and those who think that the marriage between two people they do not even know is their business are just noisy fools with a nothing better to do then try to make others as miserable as they are.

Marriage is a private matter and I find it rather rude and shallow of a group of people who think they know whats best for everyone, when they really do not have a clue. Here in reality (something conservatives are short on) are the same as everyone else. We are all Human and we all need to have equal and fair treatment for everyone..without question.

Saying that "the Gay community wants to destroy marriage" is rather pathetic Kevin and desperate at that. Its not true and you know it.

The only desperate arguments I see are the ones coming from your side, the justification that conservatives put fourth againsts the Gay Marriage/Civil Unions are based in superstitious dogma, nothing more. Some how, they got it in their small brain that if 2 guys/2 women want to get hitched their small world will collapse.. absurd in the least.

Regards,

And Justice for all

From : Kevin McCullough <kmc@nycradio.com>
Sent : Wednesday, November 1, 2006 1:27 PM
To : And justice for all
Subject : Re: Townhall.com Columnist Mail for Kevin McCullough: Gay Marriage

You can already engage in all civil protections needed, through legal arrangements... there is no fundamental discrimination against you because you choose to have sex in certain ways...



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-02-06 02:30 PM
Response to Original message
1. It's not up to the state to codone religious marriage ceremonies.
If a church has no problems marrying gays, this guy shouldn't have a problem. There is still freedom to attend the church of your choice, one that mirrors your belief system, right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidinalameda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-05-06 02:09 PM
Response to Original message
2. choose to have sex in a certain way?
what-swinging from the ceiling?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sui generis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-06-06 10:19 AM
Response to Original message
3. Tell Mr. McCullough
You don't give a flying flipping shit what he does with his dick or his property, or his opinion.

Tell him the only thing is, he better not be making decisions about your family unless he's willing to let you make decisions about his. And if he ain't then invite him to fuck off and die for good measure.

You see people like him get a thrill of pleasure from having you admit that they have any power over your life. The fact is, you're going to remain de facto married, the worst thing that asshole can do is inconvenience and annoy you, which we can do equally well right back, and your property will go where it is intended regardless of the law, which just makes him inconsequential and insignificant, like a biting fly.

And the best part is, it's all true.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchtv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-06-06 10:38 PM
Response to Original message
4. tell him how the county will reassess the surviving Partner's
Edited on Mon Nov-06-06 10:39 PM by mitchtv
home and then he will be taxed on the gift of the value of the home or half of it if owned in common; Causing Gay Seniors to lose their homes when they can least afford it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 08:21 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » GLBT Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC