Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Silver linings?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » GLBT Donate to DU
 
moose65 Donating Member (525 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-09-06 08:20 AM
Original message
Silver linings?
Even though I continue to be astonished at the bigotry of US citizens voting on these "Marriage Protection Amendments", I think we have a few positives from this election. Arizona defeated their amendment, the first time that has happened! Way to go! Maybe this is the "tipping point" that we need. It had to happen sooner or later. I was also surprised by the "narrower" margins for some of the amendments, particularly in South Dakota and right here in my own back yard, my neighboring state of Virginia (we won't talk about Tennessee)! Is this issue losing its power to motivate the bigots? I sure hope so. On one hand, it seems we've come a long way just in 6 short years since Vermont blazed the trail with civil unions. Back then, fundies were screaming that civil unions would cause the end of Western civilization, and now civil unions are seen as the "moderate" position. On the other hand, it is demoralizing to see so many of my fellow citizens vote for these amendments. I know that change is coming, but DAMN it is slow!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Ken Burch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-09-06 08:21 AM
Response to Original message
1. Long term, the trend is in your direction...
Short term there will be repression in the states that voted yes.

Basically, the work goes on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Not Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-09-06 08:45 AM
Response to Original message
2. There are a number of positives, I think
In addition to Arizona.

First, We will not hear motions on the Floor of the House for a vote on a Federal Marriage Amendment for at least two years. This will take a lot of buzz from the fundies.

Second, NY elected Elliot Spitzer as governor. He has already committed to introducing (and supporting) marriage equality in NY. (Coupled with NJ's ruling, this makes 3 large NE states where marriage may be legal in a year or two.)

Florida, which has an anti marriage equality amendment slated for 2008, just passed a constitutional amendement requiring a 60% supermajority to pass subsequent amendments. This pushes the bar very high for the 2008 antigay marriage vote.

I believe shortly after the 2008 election, there will be coordinated suits from couples in MA, NY, and NJ to challenge DOMA and IRS. That's when things are going to get interesting.

My $.02.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
terrya Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-09-06 11:14 AM
Response to Original message
3. Well....I think one thing to remember....
is that these marriage amendments are occurring in red, conservative states....Indiana, Idaho, South Carolina, South Dakota, Utah. For the most part.

We'll get same-sex marriage. It will take decades for it to happen in all 50 states (my feeling is between 30 and 50 years). But it WILL happen.

This is hard to watch right now, though. To see my fellow citizens voting for bigotry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 10:39 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » GLBT Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC