LostinRed
(292 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Nov-11-06 03:08 AM
Original message |
Any one think schwarzenegger will change his position on gay marriage |
|
Since he can't run for governor again do you think Arnold with change his position on gay marriage? Or do you think he wants to run for a federal seat and is afraid of the primaries? I know he is a supporter of domestic partnership but does anyone think he'll support the legislature if they send a gay marriage bill to him again?
|
LeftCoast
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Nov-11-06 03:11 AM
Response to Original message |
1. Latest rumor has it that he'll try and run against Boxer |
|
Who knows if that'll happen or not though. I don't really see him as Senate material personally.
|
lapfog_1
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Nov-11-06 03:16 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
2. I don't think he can defeat Boxer... especially now. |
|
I really don't think he has much of a future in politics... there isn't anywhere he can go that matches his ego.
|
LeftCoast
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Nov-11-06 03:18 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
3. Since he can't become Pres., I don't see him going anywhere else either |
|
Maybe ambassador or something like that. :)
|
davidinalameda
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-12-06 01:58 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
9. send him back to Austria |
d_b
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Nov-11-06 04:02 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
|
Boxer would tear him a new ass. I mean she damn near got 7 million votes in 2004.
|
Smarmie Doofus
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Nov-11-06 07:38 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
7. He's the *governor*. Of **California**, ferpetessake.... |
|
>>>I don't really see him as Senate material personally.>>>
If they can market him successfully to govern the most populous state in the union ( and one of the most *blue* , BTW) they can surely get him elected to the Senate.
Once there... he'd definitely be able to function as well as, say, Quayle, for instance.
|
LeftCoast
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Nov-11-06 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
8. Well, the impression people seem to have of him is that he's a good |
|
executive. When I think of Senators, I just can't picture him in the roll. His entire persona is built on being a body-builder / movie action hero. Neither of those images seems particularly well suited to being Senator of California.
:shrug:
|
terrya
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Nov-25-06 06:11 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
17. You know what his ultimate ambition is |
|
Edited on Sat Nov-25-06 06:12 PM by terrya
But that darned qualification in Article I....
They're never going to change that.
|
davidinalameda
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-12-06 02:00 AM
Response to Reply #7 |
10. he ran against the worst candidate that I can remember |
|
Boxer would run rings around him and bring home many of the Democrats that voted for him for governor
he would be lucky to pull 45% in a senate contest
|
bliss_eternal
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Nov-11-06 03:22 AM
Response to Original message |
|
Edited on Sat Nov-11-06 03:24 AM by bliss_eternal
I don't think he will change his position on gay marriage. :(
Prior to the recall of Gov. Gray Davis Arnie stated he was pro-gay marriage. Once in office, he said it wasn't an issue for him to call :eyes:, as you probably know..and then sent it into the system of CA courts/judges. In other words, the issue didn't serve him anymore. :mad:
I have high hopes that we will find a way to make gay marriage legal here in CA. in spite of that pos, sorry excuse for a governor.
|
xchrom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Nov-11-06 05:30 AM
Response to Original message |
|
ahnuld is a republican -- albeit a secular one.
but that doesn't mean he is going to purposefully rub salt in the wounds of the religous nuts running aorund in his party.
if he DOES run against boxer -- that would be the end of his career as a repuke.
|
terrya
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-13-06 07:17 PM
Response to Original message |
|
I agree with the others who suggest he'll run against Barbara Boxer. So, he needs those 'phobe votes. She'll kick his saggy ass if he runs against her, though.
|
election_2004
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Nov-25-06 01:01 AM
Response to Original message |
12. No, he'll go back to acting |
|
I think "stand-up guy" Tom McClintock will probably challenge Boxer in 2010 (assuming he doesn't run for Governor).
Arnie will continue to state in public that he is against gay marriage but in favor of civil unions, and he'll return to the Entertainment Industry upon leaving gubernatorial office in January 2011.
|
davidinalameda
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Nov-25-06 02:06 AM
Response to Reply #12 |
13. McClintock would do worse than the lamb that the Repukes |
|
sent up against DiFi
he's lost ever state-wide race he's run
|
election_2004
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Nov-25-06 01:28 PM
Response to Reply #13 |
|
I agree: if he runs against Boxer, he's toast.
The more I think about it, the more I'm convinced that McClintock may try for Governor instead, when 2010 becomes an open-seat race. The big question is: who will the Democrats run? If it's Garramendi or Chiang, they have a shot. If they run a dud like Lockyer or Tauscher, even a tool like McClintock might be able to slither through.
|
davidinalameda
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Nov-25-06 04:30 PM
Response to Reply #14 |
16. they could probably run Angelides again |
|
and he'd beat McClintock
he is just way too conservative
|
Vorta
(704 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Nov-25-06 02:03 PM
Response to Original message |
15. He might if some of his former tricks and "benefactors" were to whisper in his ear. |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 19th 2024, 07:19 AM
Response to Original message |