Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Pa. Senate Proposes Amendment to Ban Gay Marriage

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » GLBT Donate to DU
 
Omaha Steve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 04:39 PM
Original message
Pa. Senate Proposes Amendment to Ban Gay Marriage

http://www.kyw1060.com/Pa--Senate-Proposes-Amendment-to-Ban-Gay-Marriage/1838567

Posted: Monday, 17 March 2008 3:09PM

by KYW's Tony Romeo

The state Senate is once again taking up a proposal to amend the Pennsylvania constitution to ban gay marriage.

Constitutional amendment legislation failed in the last legislative session but is being considered anew in the current session.

During a Senate committee hearing, Maggie Gallagher, President of the National Organization for Marriage, said an amendment to the state constitution would protect against a judge’s ruling that could strike down state law defining marriage as between a man and woman…

“It’s not a fantasy that this could happen. It is happening – it’s happened in New Jersey, it’s happened in Connecticut”

Gallagher was speaking to Republican Senator Jane Earll of Erie, skeptical of the need for a constitutional amendment:

“We are going to hold our constitution hostage to the wackiest judge in some other state. I just think that amending the constitution is a very drastic measure”

Earll called the push for a constitutional amendment ‘perplexing’.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
hulklogan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 04:53 PM
Response to Original message
1. The Supreme Courts in Massachusetts and New Jersey are
"the wackiest judge in some other state"? I think the civil rights deniers are getting more stupid every day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 04:59 PM
Response to Original message
2. The idea is to get it on the ballot to juice up the conservative turnout, see?
Nothing perplexing at all....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
InsultComicDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-18-08 06:20 AM
Response to Reply #2
7. yup
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kceres Donating Member (839 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 05:32 PM
Response to Original message
3. The National Organization of Marriage?
Give me a break.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MuseRider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 06:09 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. My first thought too.
Just like white folks and the christians marriages are being threatened. :eyes:

Why do those least threatened or least subject to discrimination always try to paint themselves as the victims? They are the perps. Do people other than them really buy this? If so, why? We need to figure this out. Is it just plain old stupidity?

Jeeze, I am married and I knew nothing of the NOM! Did they forget to send us our membership cards?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 05:50 PM
Response to Original message
4. i guess the economy in PA is in heavenly shape
if this is that important to bring it up again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ccharles000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 07:14 PM
Response to Original message
6. ...
:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
InsultComicDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-18-08 06:28 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
drm604 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-20-08 07:35 PM
Response to Original message
9. Maggie Gallagher
It looks like Maggie Gallagher is one those paid pundits.
From here: http://www.cnn.com/2005/ALLPOLITICS/01/26/paid.pundits/
On Wednesday, Washington Post media critic and CNN host Howard Kurtz reported that in 2002 syndicated columnist Maggie Gallagher "repeatedly defended President Bush's push for a $300 million initiative encouraging marriage as a way of strengthening families," without mentioning she "had a $21,500 contract with the Department of Health and Human Services to help promote the president's proposal."
...
Gallagher, a frequent television guest and a former editor at the conservative National Review, is the author of three books on marriage and president of the new nonprofit organization, Institute for Marriage and Public Policy, based in Washington.

This looks like a cynical ploy to get religious conservatives out to the polls. These people have no shame.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zuiderelle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-20-08 07:44 PM
Response to Original message
10. This way, we know when there's an important election coming up.
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Red Zelda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 09:14 AM
Response to Original message
11. Funny how these freaks in the Legislature...
always turn up the volume on these things when a big election is near.
And, believe me, there's no more bigger crate of bastards than the Pa. General ASSembly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 11:17 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » GLBT Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC