Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

My school has decided that "queer" is a bad word.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » GLBT Donate to DU
 
lightningandsnow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 09:15 PM
Original message
My school has decided that "queer" is a bad word.
Seriously. Apparently it counts as "profanity", even when used in a non-derogatory sense, and is banned from all school drama productions.

You know, I just love when people turn my identity into a swear word. :sarcasm:

I think I'm going to make a t-shirt that says queer on it. And wear it to school.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MercutioATC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 09:17 PM
Response to Original message
1. To be fair, they're trying to "protect" gays...
...in a completely silly and constitutionally-inappropriate way, but I believe the intent is there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
porcelain_doll Donating Member (124 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 09:20 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Iffy.
But I agree in a way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 09:23 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. The road to hell is paved with good intentions
and there's a big difference between using the word in its literary sense and using it as a pejorative and any educated adult should be able to tell that difference.

High school kids are thugs, though, and will try to push that envelope. If they're creative enough, they should get away with it. However, most of them are dumb as doorknobs and any teacher who has an ear out should easily be able to tell the difference.

I hate those zero tolerance things. They're for people with zero wit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sui generis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-29-08 08:26 AM
Response to Reply #1
32. it would help if they involved some gays in that strategy though
you know, ask us what we think, instead of thinking for us . . . . we ARE grownups, after all, paying bills, raising kiddos, and all the other grown up things we have to do.

It's patronizing and inappropriate and should be shot down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WannaJumpMyScooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 09:29 PM
Response to Original message
4. Well, tell them that my queer has decided
that school is a bad word.

So there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 09:46 PM
Response to Original message
5. Honestly I can see what they are doing
it would be similar to banning the n word but even that is permitted in things like Huckaberry Finn.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 09:49 PM
Response to Original message
6. yeah -- since i'm not fond of that descriptive for gay people
and it has a far, far longer association as a pejorative than as a reclaimed word -- i have no problem with it.

you really can't say or do just anything you want in this world.

and queer is offensive to many, many gay folk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orrex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 09:55 PM
Response to Original message
7. From Moby Dick, Chapter Twelve
Edited on Mon May-26-08 09:57 PM by Orrex
And thus an old idolater at heart, he yet lived among these Christians, wore their clothes, and tried to talk their gibberish. Hence the queer ways about him, though now some time from home.

Page 47 in my Barnes & Noble edition.


I always knew that there was something not quite right about that book. Hell, "queer" pops up again and again. The children must be protected from this pernicious word at all costs!

on edit: Despite my misgivings about any effort by a school to ban a word in this fashion, I am sympathetic to the concerns of people who are touched more directly by the malicious use of "queer" than I am. Still, a zero-tolerance policy usually isn't the way to go IMO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 10:17 PM
Response to Original message
8. Well, there will be no watching BLANK Eye for the Straight Guy reruns, then! NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillParkinson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-26-08 11:04 PM
Response to Original message
9. Sorry, AspieGrrl...
I'm one of those "older folks" who finds the word degrading. Heard it used a lot when I was a kid.

I agree with someone else, though. A blanket no-tolerance policy is extreme.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeybee12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-27-08 10:46 AM
Response to Reply #9
13. Same here...I remember cringing the first time I heard people
referring to themselves that way...it's a generational thing and queer conjures up hateful intentions IMHO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
notesdev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-27-08 12:51 AM
Response to Original message
10. People who try to ban words
need to get a life.

The pretense that by banning the word you can ban thoughts is a destructive absurdity, and it does no one any good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toasterlad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-27-08 04:53 PM
Response to Reply #10
16. I Totally Agree. Banning Words Does Absolutely Nothing to Combat Hate.
All it does is give the word more power.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kdpeters Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-27-08 01:40 AM
Response to Original message
11. That would be an example of political correctness in its most negative connotation
The one that simply focuses on the diction of the language without any regard to the concept or context of the thought being expressed.

I agree with the people here who recognize that the intent in itself is in the right place, but I also agree with those decrying an across the board prohibition against a single word no matter the context spoken and no matter the concept being expressed. I'm a lover of language and such a simplistic dumbing down type policy seems to me a perversion of language.

Personally, I love the word queer and generally prefer to use either 'queer' or 'gay' rather than the alphabet soup type acronyms ... GLBTIQQada;lkjsdf asdf;ljk which I find really really tedious. Whereas gay is a little less threatening in mixed company, it works as a general descriptor of sexual minorities. I just don't feel it is inclusive enough to envelope our transgender, intergender and other brothers and sisters that defy labels yet are one of us by virtue of being a sexual minority. For that, queer works quite well, but it also has the quality of being a little bit more confrontational and counter-cultural. In my opinion, that's still a positive aspect of the word. I like that implication of rebeliousness implied by its usage. I can see why reasonable people disagree and find it discomfiting. I respect that, but I disagree.

But any teacher, any schoolyard bully, and any of his victims know instinctively that the same word that can sometimes represent pride and inclusiveness, can also be used to harass and degrade. Zero tolerance policies like these ask us to throw away our language processing centers in the brain and respond to human language as if we were automatons and not even human at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
La Lioness Priyanka Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-27-08 08:23 AM
Response to Original message
12. actually i am going to agree with the school on this one
while queer is a reclaimed word for those who are young and comfortable w.their sexual orientation, it can and has been used as a perjorative for many years. imagine that you are not out and somewhat is hurling that word at you. highschool parents/teachers want you to be safe. college is more the place you go to, to break boundaries and create you own identities etc.

in a mostly under-18 crowd, where very few understand the implication of QUEER, in my opinion if the school banned it, its not a bad thing.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lightningandsnow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-27-08 11:33 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. You're right, but,
The thing is my school doesn't do a damn thing about all the kids who call everything they don't like "gay" and "retarded". So it seems kind of misplaced.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
La Lioness Priyanka Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-27-08 11:36 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. gay is an actual definition as is retarded. so really you cant ban those words.
queer is more risque, a perjorative that has very recently been reclaimed.

i bet they would ban dyke too but not lesbian

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MNBrewer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-27-08 06:26 PM
Response to Reply #15
19. queer isn't a "definition"?
American Heritage Dictionary

Queer (adj.)

1. Deviating from the expected or normal; strange: a queer situation.
2. Odd or unconventional, as in behavior; eccentric. See Synonyms at strange.
3. Of a questionable nature or character; suspicious.
4. Slang Fake; counterfeit.
5. Feeling slightly ill; queasy.
6. Offensive Slang Homosexual.
7. Usage Problem Of or relating to lesbians, gay men, bisexuals, or transgendered people.

Lots of definitions, apparently.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
La Lioness Priyanka Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-27-08 07:18 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. yes, but its a reclaimed perjorative. if they banned 'gay' their would be
rightfully a huge outcry.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MNBrewer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-27-08 07:36 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. and queer isn't?
Edited on Tue May-27-08 07:51 PM by MNBrewer
On edit. I mean and GAY isn't? they're both "reclaimed pejoratives"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
La Lioness Priyanka Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-27-08 07:52 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. no because even within our community there is lot of disagreement about queer
and before you keep acting as though i am the foe, i id as queer too
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MNBrewer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-27-08 07:58 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. So then, it's a matter of preference
Some people prefer one reclaimed pejorative over another. Both words have negative connotations regarding homosexuals. Both words are about as old in their application toward homosexuals. Gay and queer began to be "reclaimed" within about 10 or 20 years of each other, gay first, then queer.

My take on it is that because gay usually is used in reference to gay men, while queer covers a huge gamut of sexual orientation/etc. that gay became "acceptable", while the word queer "offends" mostly those who object to being lumped in with bisexuals/transexuals/etc. Just an opinion, of course.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MNBrewer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-27-08 08:03 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. Or, in other words
There's even disagreement about just who "our community" includes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MNBrewer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-27-08 06:28 PM
Response to Reply #15
20. Definition of "GAY"
Again, American Heritage Dictionary.

Gay (adj.)

1. Of, relating to, or having a sexual orientation to persons of the same sex.
2. Showing or characterized by cheerfulness and lighthearted excitement; merry.
3. Bright or lively, especially in color: a gay, sunny room.
4. Given to social pleasures.
5. Dissolute; licentious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sui generis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-29-08 08:38 AM
Response to Reply #12
33. I just don't think that anyone but us should be making that decision for us
That's my problem with it. I kind of feel like we're being babysitted and patronized, and they're doing this "for our own good", and all the other baggage that comes with that.

Yes, I know, I'm a rebel without a pause.

Why does this "majority" have the right to insinuate that I can't refer to myself this way in public without being punished for it?

What happened to protecting my rights in this matter? Intent aside, it has bigger consequences that I'm uncomfortable with.

We should not be using enforceable rules and law in place of education, especially if we believe that governance is by the consent of the governed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lyric Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 11:39 PM
Response to Reply #12
35. I agree with the school too, mostly because
Edited on Wed Jun-04-08 11:39 PM by oktoberain
if they allow the word "queer", how can they tell for sure who's using it an an "acceptable" way and who isn't? There are *gay* people who would be offended if another gay person referred to them as "queer". Allowing it gives the subtle homophobes a way to insult and deride without getting caught, because they can go all wide-eyed and innocent and claim that they "thought that word was okay to use now."

Since there's no 100% accurate way to determine intent, it's better that a word with that kind of capacity to hurt be left outside of a public school.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zuiderelle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-27-08 05:10 PM
Response to Original message
17. It's difficult to ban words in a specific context, so they ban the word itself.
And (I think) that's ok in this context. I have only experienced straight people's use of the word in a negative sense. It's only gay people who have sought to reclaim "queer" and use it as a positive term. That's not the same thing as "gay" which is used by all sides both negative and positive.

If it were possible to ban the thought behind the words, then gay and retarded should be banned as well, but it's not possible, or it's at least very difficult and subjective. Queer, on the other hand, is normally only positive when gay people use it in reference to themselves. It would be ok if it were used in its original meaning, which is "odd," but since it's so firmly associated with gay people, it's hard to distinguish that. (Personally that's why I object to the term, since it is equating being gay with being odd, as, ironically, "gay" is now used to describe odd things.)

That said, I don't know how effective banning its use could be. It will only make it more challenging for some people to try to use it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MNBrewer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-27-08 06:22 PM
Response to Original message
18. I already weighed in on the use of the word "queer"
And lots of people jumped on my ass because of it. The q-word war was won by the queers, but the anti-queers just haven't realized it yet. and before any of you jump on me again

1, NO, I'm NOT young. I'm 43.

2. No, I didn't grow up in an enlightened urban area. I grew up in rural Georgia.

3. Yeah, I got hurt by being called queer, but I also got hurt by being called gay. what's the difference?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ms. Toad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-27-08 07:18 PM
Response to Original message
22. As a former teacher
who hated the dress code, since it meant that I had to spend a good portion of every period in my most challenging classes fighting about why I was the only teacher who enforced the rules, rather than teaching, I would not have welcomed another rule to force.

On the other hand, I also spent a significant amount of time calling students on intolerant behavior toward each other - only to be rewarded by, "I didn't mean it that way." "Queer" was then, as "gay" is now, a word that is definitely used in both contexts - I can generally tell the difference subjectively, but would be hard pressed to objectively categorize it. When that happens, the teacher (and the target of the comment) loses. I actually don't hear "queer" thrown about in a derogatory context nearly as much as "gay" among my daughter's classmates.

I don't know what the solution is, but anytime you put the teacher in the position of having to make a subjective call about student behavior it is not a good thing. So, I guess my vote would be to either ban it in all but literary contexts objectively having nothing to do with sexuality, or to remain silent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-27-08 11:10 PM
Response to Original message
27. since we're traipsing out definitions



http://www.askoxford.com/concise_oed/gay?view=uk
gay


  • adjective (gayer, gayest) 1 (especially of a man) homosexual. 2 relating to homosexuals. 3 dated light-hearted and carefree. 4 dated brightly coloured; showy.

  • noun a homosexual person, especially a man.

  — DERIVATIVES gayness noun.

  — USAGE Gay is now a standard term for ‘homosexual’, and is the term preferred by homosexual men to describe themselves. As a result, it is now very difficult to use gay in its earlier meanings ‘carefree’ or ‘bright and showy’ without arousing a sense of double entendre. Gay in its modern sense typically refers to men, lesbian being the standard term for homosexual women.

  — ORIGIN Old French gai.




http://www.askoxford.com/concise_oed/queer?view=uk
 
queer


  • adjective 1 strange; odd. 2 informal, derogatory (of a man) homosexual. 3 Brit. informal, dated slightly ill.

  • noun informal, derogatory a homosexual man.

  • verb informal spoil or ruin.

  — PHRASES in Queer Street Brit. informal, dated in difficulty or debt. queer someone’s pitch Brit. informal spoil someone’s plans or chances of doing something.

  — DERIVATIVES queerish adjective queerly adverb queerness noun.

  — USAGE The word queer was first used to mean ‘homosexual’ in the early 20th century. It was originally, and usually still is, a deliberately derogatory term when used by heterosexual people. In recent years, however, gay people have taken the word queer and deliberately used it in place of gay or homosexual, in an attempt, by using the word positively, to deprive it of its negative power.

  — ORIGIN perhaps from German quer ‘oblique, perverse’.


i'll take the the oxford dictionary over the american heritage dictionary any day.

and please note -- both gay and queer --generally speaking -- really refer to men -- not women.

gay is a term we fought for because 'homosexual' is what medical science used to lock us up.
both men and women.

while gay tries to claimed by the straight community as a derogatory -- gay really is our word.

now you can think it's hip or whatever to to reclaim queer -- but it has a far longer history -- and continues to be -- a derogatory term
that is next of kin to the 'n' word if you ask me.


 



 
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MNBrewer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-27-08 11:39 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. Far longer history?
Edited on Tue May-27-08 11:48 PM by MNBrewer
Oh, really? How much longer? (edited)

GAY: (Online Etymology Dictionary)

OED gives 1951 as earliest date for slang meaning "homosexual" (adj.), but this is certainly too late; gey cat "homosexual boy" is attested in N. Erskine's 1933 dictionary of "Underworld & Prison Slang;" the term gey cat (gey is a Scot. variant of gay) was used as far back as 1893 in Amer.Eng. for "young hobo," one who is new on the road and usually in the company of an older tramp, with catamite connotations. But Josiah Flynt <"Tramping With Tramps," 1905> defines gay cat as, "An amateur tramp who works when his begging courage fails him." Gey cats also were said to be tramps who offered sexual services to women. The "Dictionary of American Slang" reports that gay (adj.) was used by homosexuals, among themselves, in this sense since at least 1920. Rawson <"Wicked Words"> notes a male prostitute using gay in reference to male homosexuals (but also to female prostitutes) in London's notorious Cleveland Street Scandal of 1889. Ayto <"20th Century Words"> calls attention to the ambiguous use of the word in the 1868 song "The Gay Young Clerk in the Dry Goods Store," by U.S. female impersonator Will S. Hays. The word gay in the 1890s had an overall tinge of promiscuity -- a gay house was a brothel. The suggestion of immorality in the word can be traced back to 1637. Gay as a noun meaning "a (usually male) homosexual" is attested from 1971.

QUEER: (Online Etymology Dictionary)

1508, "strange, peculiar, eccentric," from Scottish, perhaps from Low Ger. (Brunswick dialect) queer "oblique, off-center," related to Ger. quer "oblique, perverse, odd," from O.H.G. twerh "oblique," from PIE base *twerk- "to turn, twist, wind" (related to thwart). The verb "to spoil, ruin" is first recorded 1812. Sense of "homosexual" first recorded 1922; the noun in this sense is 1935, from the adj.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 07:09 AM
Response to Reply #28
29. well -- yeah -- longer --

http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?search=gay&searchmode=none

1178, "full of joy or mirth," from O.Fr. gai "gay, merry," perhaps from Frank. *gahi (cf. O.H.G. wahi "pretty"). Meaning "brilliant, showy" is from c.1300. OED gives 1951 as earliest date for slang meaning "homosexual" (adj.), but this is certainly too late; gey cat "homosexual boy" is attested in N. Erskine's 1933 dictionary of "Underworld & Prison Slang;" the term gey cat (gey is a Scot. variant of gay) was used as far back as 1893 in Amer.Eng. for "young hobo," one who is new on the road and usually in the company of an older tramp, with catamite connotations. But Josiah Flynt <"Tramping With Tramps," 1905> defines gay cat as, "An amateur tramp who works when his begging courage fails him." Gey cats also were said to be tramps who offered sexual services to women. The "Dictionary of American Slang" reports that gay (adj.) was used by homosexuals, among themselves, in this sense since at least 1920. Rawson <"Wicked Words"> notes a male prostitute using gay in reference to male homosexuals (but also to female prostitutes) in London's notorious Cleveland Street Scandal of 1889. Ayto <"20th Century Words"> calls attention to the ambiguous use of the word in the 1868 song "The Gay Young Clerk in the Dry Goods Store," by U.S. female impersonator Will S. Hays. The word gay in the 1890s had an overall tinge of promiscuity -- a gay house was a brothel. The suggestion of immorality in the word can be traced back to 1637. Gay as a noun meaning "a (usually male) homosexual" is attested from 1971.


it's not until 1922 that queer begins to have a gay reference -- and it's nothing but negative

http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?search=queer&searchmode=none

1508, "strange, peculiar, eccentric," from Scottish, perhaps from Low Ger. (Brunswick dialect) queer "oblique, off-center," related to Ger. quer "oblique, perverse, odd," from O.H.G. twerh "oblique," from PIE base *twerk- "to turn, twist, wind" (related to thwart). The verb "to spoil, ruin" is first recorded 1812. Sense of "homosexual" first recorded 1922; the noun in this sense is 1935, from the adj.


in fact homosexual -- laid on us by the medical science community has a longer negative conotation than queer -- but only slightly.

we fought for the word gay -- we made it our own.
we re-named the whole world with that word.

you don't like it -- or you don't find the others offensive -- fine -- no one is going to baby-sit you.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MNBrewer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 07:47 PM
Response to Reply #29
30. I don't find the word homosexual to be negative in the slightest.
and I don't recall having asked to be baby-sat. You seem to have volunteered all on your own.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-29-08 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #30
34. if you knew your history --
homosexual is the word -- the pathology that medical science used to do things like perform electroshock therapy on gay men's genitals.
entrap us in asylums, etc

gay men fought for that word because homosexual was their's -- their disease -- their illness foisted on us.

but whatever -- pointing out elementary gay history isn't baby sitting.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MNBrewer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 07:51 PM
Response to Original message
31. It's all in your mind.
"Why, then, 'tis none to you; for there is nothing
either good or bad, but thinking makes it so: to me
it is a prison."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
galledgoblin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 12:05 AM
Response to Original message
36. "...and is banned from all school drama productions"
that's the part of the policy that bothers me, otherwise I would completely side with the school and love them for the effort.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
La Lioness Priyanka Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 09:18 AM
Response to Reply #36
37. yeah, agreed. that part of policy is dumb.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Falcon_Lights1916 Donating Member (69 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 04:08 PM
Response to Original message
38. I See Where They Are Coming From,...
Edited on Thu Jun-05-08 04:53 PM by Falcon_Lights1916
For decades, "queer" was used as an epithet against GLTB people, but in the last 15 years or so, GLBT people have begun to take the term back, using it with pride instead of shame. As a gay person who came out in the early 70s, I admit I'm not too crazy about people using this word--there is a lot of negative baggage associated with it.But I do see where those who want to reclaim it as a word of pride are coming from.

As mentioned elsewhere on this thread, it is probably a well-meant attempt to protect GLBT people. Considerate, but I, too, wish they would have had some GLBT people in on the decision. As long as it is emphasized that the term is used negatively only by ignorant bigots, I don't see why "queer" cannot be used.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
galledgoblin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-07-08 06:16 PM
Response to Original message
39. what's the policy on other iffy or hateful speech?
how well is the policy enforced?

if it's only the students who use "queer" in a positive sense who are called out by the faculty, then you may have an issue to at the very least talk back to the teachers on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carnea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-07-08 11:34 PM
Response to Original message
40. Banning any words from drama productions is horrible.
Honestly they are trying to ban plays with Gay themes. Really what other plays have the word Queer in them.

Not that gays are there only target.

Schools are now banning all sorts of words from plays. More grievous they ban ideas. No more sex in Romeo and Juliet no more Suicide in Romeo and Juliet no more swords in Romeo and Juliet. I don't no what you end up with but it isn't Romeo and Juliet.

This is a horrible offensive attack on artistic freedom and I am a little surprised by the support it gets here.

This post is brought to you by the "Society against people having a good time" a surprisingly non-partisan group of people who's slogan is "We're not happy unless your not happy."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karl_Bonner_1982 Donating Member (701 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-09-08 01:16 PM
Response to Original message
41. Every "swear word" needs context exceptions
This is like the people who tried to ban Huckleberry Finn from school curriculum because it used the word "nigger." It's all about the context, folks.

Here's another one. Due to my last name I was called "Boner" a lot growing up. But didn't they have a character named that on TV some time ago? Like, on prime time? And what about the old days when "boner" meant a gaffe or silly mistake? Do we now have to go back and remove any old literature or movies from school libraries and TV that happen to have this word, used in a completely innocent context at the time?

The zero-tolerance Nazis really drive me insane. They can't seem to understand that there are circumstances when a certain action is OK, and others where it is definitely not OK. They need to be taught a course in situational ethics...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
galledgoblin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-09-08 05:18 PM
Response to Reply #41
42. just playing devil's advocate
it is hard for administrators to say "X*" is ok, but "X" is not. it's just easier to make a broad, sweeping rule banning all usage.

of course, it's also moronic, and well worth the effort to make those exceptions because it creates a better environment in the long run.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karl_Bonner_1982 Donating Member (701 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-09-08 08:12 PM
Response to Reply #42
44. Playing "argue my case":
We want the baby but not the bath water. There's no reason we should have to accept either both or neither.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
galledgoblin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-09-08 08:22 PM
Response to Reply #44
46. I agree
I'm just saying that I understand that it's easier to make a zero tolerance policy- easier, not better, and even then, it's only easier in the short term.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toasterlad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-09-08 06:58 PM
Response to Reply #41
43. Tee Hee! "Boner" Tee Hee!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karl_Bonner_1982 Donating Member (701 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-09-08 08:17 PM
Response to Reply #43
45. My friend from across the alley showed me this a couple years back...
I couldn't stop laughing. You realize that in the early 1950s the "B" word was used almost entirely to mean a goof. But this comic seemed to be hinting at another meaning...too funny to be a pure coincidence!

I miss being called Boner all the time...sure it was uncomfy for the first few months that I knew what it meant (way back in like fourth or fifth grade), but eventually you get used to these things. And most gay guys and straight chicks seem to like it too...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 04:50 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » GLBT Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC