Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

F.D.A. Reviews Arthritis Drugs for Cancer Link

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Health Donate to DU
 
RedEarth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 02:44 PM
Original message
F.D.A. Reviews Arthritis Drugs for Cancer Link
WASHINGTON — Federal regulators are investigating whether a group of arthritis drugs made by Abbott Laboratories, the Schering-Plough Corporation and other companies heighten the risk of cancer in youngsters.

The Food and Drug Administration said Wednesday that it had received 30 reports of children and young adults developing cancer while taking the drugs over the last 10 years.

The drugs include Abbott Labs’ Humira, Schering-Plough’s Remicade and Enbrel, which is marketed by Amgen and Wyeth. The drugs are prescribed to children with arthritis to block a chemical that causes inflammation. They are also used to treat children with the intestinal disorder Crohn’s disease.

The products, known as tumor necrosis factor blockers, are key revenue drivers for the companies. Abbott’s Humira was the company’s best-selling product last year with over $3 billion in sales. Remicade also topped Schering-Plough’s portfolio with sales of $1.65 billion.

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/05/business/05drug.html?_r=1&partner=MYWAY&ei=5065&oref=slogin
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
PSPS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 03:04 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yeah, sure. Like Bush's FDA will do anything about a toxic "key revenue driver" for a contributor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 10:32 PM
Response to Original message
2. As always, risk versus benefit needs to be considered carefully.
When you weigh the benefit of not ending up in a wheelchair at the age of fifteen, completely unable to care for yourself due to massive joint destruction, the chance of neoplasm seems acceptable. Likewise, looking at a colectomy and colostomy at the same age might seem worse than a small chance of developing a cancer later.

Don't kid yourself, these are incredibly powerful drugs with very serious side effects. However, the diseases they treat are also horrific.

Patients need to be fully informed of both potential risk and potential benefit so that they can make informed decisions about their treatment. However, withdrawing the drugs because a few people have lethal problems with them when so many more people are thrown into complete remission by them seems both cruel and shortsighted.

Right now the drugs are on patent and ridiculously overpriced. They are not overused, however, and only patients in real trouble who haven't responded to more benign treatment are considered for them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 03:48 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Health Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC