Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Debunking The Blue Agave Myth (basically HFCS masquerading as a health food)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Health Donate to DU
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-15-10 04:50 PM
Original message
Debunking The Blue Agave Myth (basically HFCS masquerading as a health food)
Debunking The Blue Agave Myth

Agave syrup (nectar) is basically high-fructose corn syrup masquerading as a health food.

Sorry. Don't kill the messenger.

It's easy to understand how agave syrup got its great reputation. Even the word "Agave" has a fine pedigree, coming from the Greek word for noble. The blue agave species- considered the best for the making agave nectar -- flourishes in rich volcanic soil. (It's also the only variety permitted to be used for the making of tequila.) And extracts from the agave plant have been shown to have anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties.

Unfortunately there's zero evidence that any of those compounds are present in the commercially made syrup.

Agave nectar is an amber-colored liquid that pours more easily than honey and is considerably sweeter than sugar. The health-food crowd loves it because it is gluten-free and suitable for vegan diets, and, most especially, because it's low-glycemic (we'll get to that in a moment). Largely because of its very low glycemic impact, agave nectar is marketed as "diabetic friendly". What's not to like?

As it turns out, quite a lot.

Agave nectar has a low-glycemic index for one reason only: it's largely made of fructose, which although it has a low-glycemic index, is probably the single most damaging form of sugar when used as a sweetener. With the exception of pure liquid fructose, agave nectar has the highest fructose content of any commercial sweetener.

All sugar -- from table sugar to HFCS (high-fructose corn syrup) to honey -- contains some mixture of fructose and glucose. Table sugar is 50/50, HFCS is 55/45. Agave nectar is a whopping 90 percent fructose, almost -- but not quite -- twice as high as HFCS.

-snip
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/dr-jonny-bowden/debunking-the-blue-agave_b_450144.html

What next? :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MercutioATC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-15-10 05:34 PM
Response to Original message
1. I guess I have to stop referring to tequila shots as " my vitamins" now, huh?
:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tesha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-15-10 05:42 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Tequila still contains lots of "Vitamin A"! (NT)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-15-10 06:05 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. "Vitamins," "therapy," "old friend."
They all work in this house. :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-15-10 05:43 PM
Response to Original message
3. Did not know any of this about agave. Thank you. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-15-10 06:01 PM
Response to Original message
4. I had heard that tests with Diabetics had to be halted do to serious
safety issues. And I had heard that it was processed in a way essentially identical to HFCS.

That was enough for me to be very skeptical about it until more information came in. It was just a matter of time.

Why can't we just learn to eat food that isn't sweet? Do we really need sweetener in every damned thing?

Wouldn't you enjoy something sweet a lot more if it was a very occasional treat, instead of a constant presence in every part of your diet? Why eat Dessert instead of the meal, for every single meal you eat?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trotsky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-15-10 07:17 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. It's a very ancient part of our metabolism.
We have these big brains, you see, that need a LOT of caloric intake. Evolution equipped us with the sweet tooth, so we would naturally prefer those fruits with a higher sugar content. Similar to how we love our tasty, marbled meat. Oh my. I need to go eat now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-15-10 08:41 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. Craving carbs is not the same is this modern thing of having
sugar and sweeteners dumped into everything we eat.

Yes, I know the brain needs sugar/carb intake. That just isn't the same thing, or even remotely in the same order of magnitude as the bulk amount of sweetener people consume now in every processed and sweetened pre-made or packaged food we buy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trotsky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-15-10 09:42 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. I'm not saying it compares to the amount of sweetener today.
I'm saying that's why it tastes good, and why people prefer sweeter things. It was extremely helpful when the sweetest thing we could find were wild berries; it's not a very helpful thing now that sugar is so plentiful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HuckleB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-15-10 06:55 PM
Response to Original message
6. Even if it's late to the party, I'm glad HuffPo actually published an accurate health care article.
I'm sure Jenny McCarthy and Oprah are going to slap this poor nutritionist silly, however. Now what will they tell their fans to eat?

Some nutritionists have been trying to get the press' attention on this for a while.
http://www.westonaprice.org/Agave-Worse-than-Sugar-Nutrition-Foundation-Warns.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trotsky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-15-10 07:18 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Well, you know what they say about a blind squirrel.
If he's had shots, he's got autism. Or something like that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftyMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-15-10 08:31 PM
Response to Original message
9. This is almost word-for-word repeat of the Weston A. Price quacks.
Edited on Mon Feb-15-10 08:31 PM by LeftyMom
I assume the author is a follower of theirs, since her other publications include rants about the evils of soy and cholesterol meds (the WAP nuts think high serum cholesterol is good for you. Really.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HuckleB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-15-10 09:46 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. You're on the wrong track if you're chasing quacks.
Edited on Mon Feb-15-10 09:47 PM by HuckleB
And the author is not a "her."

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftyMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-15-10 10:25 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. There's a lot of quackery here.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/dr-jonny-bowden/#blogger_bio

You got me on the pronoun screw-up though. I need more sleep.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HuckleB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-15-10 10:39 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Uh, at HuffPo, yes!
Edited on Mon Feb-15-10 10:57 PM by HuckleB
Maybe even with this particular author, but not so much on this issue.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 11:39 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Health Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC