Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Earth's core spins faster than its surface

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Science Donate to DU
 
Celebration Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-26-05 05:41 AM
Original message
Earth's core spins faster than its surface
http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/national/238080_spin26.html

Scientists who used decades' worth of earthquake data to study the planet's center say their information proves decisively that Earth's core spins faster than the outer crust.

The researchers first claimed nine years ago that the solid inner core was spinning faster than the outer part of the planet, but they were met with challenges by other seismologists who contended that their measurements were incorrect.

"Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof," said Xiadong Song, a professor of geology at the University of Illinois-Urbana-Champaign and a co-author of a study published today in the journal Science. "We believe we have that proof."


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
htuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-26-05 07:23 AM
Response to Original message
1. Silly me, I thought this was already the accepted theory
I would have sworn that this was the mainstream theory already. I thought that this is what produced Earth's magnetic field.

Huh.

:shrug:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trotsky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-26-05 09:32 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. I believe it is convection currents
of molten iron in the core and mantle that cause the field.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WindRavenX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-26-05 09:32 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Yes
Also, plate tectonics seem to also play a critical- if not wholly necessary- role in producing a molten core.
In addition to providing a magnetic field, the speed of our rotation helps keep the atmosphere from dissipating into space.
Mars, which may have had one or both of the two factors discussed here- molten core + plate tectonics- may have been too small to hold an atmosphere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Meldread Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-27-05 10:44 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. What about Venus?
It is about the size of Earth and can hold an atmosphere but has a very weak magnetic field.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WindRavenX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-27-05 06:14 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. No plate tectonics
...This is so absolutely crucial, that many astrobiologists think that plate tectonic could be THE determining factor in whether a planet can sustain conditions for complex life; a magnetic field is needed in order for this.

If you're interested more in this, check out the bible of astrobiology, Rare Earth: Why Complex Life is So Rare In The Universe"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Meldread Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-28-05 05:27 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Thanks, I'll look into it.
...however... couldn't life on a planet with high solar radiation just evolve to withstand / become immune to it? Or perhaps life would evolve to use the radiation in some useful way? Certainly Earth Life wouldn't make it, but alien life...?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WindRavenX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-28-05 06:20 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Well, that's the big question
Based on our limits of understanding the boundaries for life, DNA/RNA and nucleic acids really can't withstand solar bombardment...so if another form of life could exist on another system that isn't DNA based and is able to withstand intense radiation- then who knows.
Based on what we know...it seems very unlikely that any life- even simplistic bacteria, including the extremeophilic bacteria- can develop in high radiation.
But there's a lot we don't know =)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Meldread Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-26-05 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Ditto. I was under the same impression.
Either you an I are psychic and don't know it, or these guys are late. :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Up2Late Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-29-05 01:37 AM
Response to Original message
9. Duh, I could of told them that.
And how the Hell did they supposedly "Prove" this, when we can't even drill past the Crust?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 08:55 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Science Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC