Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Inventor sets his sights on immortality

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Science Donate to DU
 
Dookus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-13-05 02:46 AM
Original message
Inventor sets his sights on immortality
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6959575/

WELLESLEY, Mass. - Ray Kurzweil doesn’t tailgate. A man who plans to live forever doesn’t take chances with his health on the highway, or anywhere else.

As part of his daily routine, Kurzweil ingests 250 supplements, eight to 10 glasses of alkaline water and 10 cups of green tea. He also periodically tracks 40 to 50 fitness indicators, down to his “tactile sensitivity.” Adjustments are made as needed.

“I do actually fine-tune my programming,” he said.

The inventor and computer scientist is serious about his health because if it fails him he might not live long enough to see humanity achieve immortality, a seismic development he predicts in
his new book is no more than 20 years away.

(more at link above)

************************************************

First, I think he's probably mistaken in his assessment that we're so close to achieving such a thing. But more importantly, I believe it's undesirable.

Immortality would be a horrible development in mankind's development. It would concentrate even further wealth in the hands of a few, would be a tremendous drain on resources, and would basically insure that the people from whom our only release is their certain death would hang on to dog us forever.

I also find it odd that he points to his 1990 "prediction" of a worldwide computer network and a computer that could beat a chess champion as evidence of anything other than being slightly aware of the world around him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rawtribe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-13-05 02:55 AM
Response to Original message
1. Who wants to live forever
Edited on Sun Feb-13-05 03:08 AM by rawtribe
if you have to spend all you time in the bathroom? 10 glasses of water and 10 cups of green tea....no thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dookus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-13-05 02:59 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. LOL
good point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lapfog_1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-13-05 03:01 AM
Response to Original message
3. Wow... In 1990 he predicted a computer could beat a chess champion

His acumen knows no bounds!

Actually, in 1983 *I* helped write a chess playing program which,
given sufficient cycles on the computer it was designed for - a
Cray 1 - could have given a grand master a hard time. It did very
well in the ACM chess tournaments of the era. I was quite certain
THEN that a chess playing computer would someday very soon defeat
any human opponent.

As for a global network? WTF? I started working in the Arpanet
in 1976... by 1988 (while working at NASA) not only did we HAVE a
global computer network, but we had plans to place internet nodes
into planetary probes, making the Internet at least a Solar wide
network.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spinzonner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-13-05 06:45 AM
Response to Original message
4. A piano will fall on him

He's neglecting the influence of quantum events
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orsino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 04:34 PM
Response to Original message
5. Hmmm.
The advertising slogan: "You can't take it with you, but who says you have to go?"

Imagine wealthy families torn apart, as the offspring vie to do away with parents that stand in the way of their inheritance.

The poor, who would never be allowed anywhere near such a treament anyway, will maintain stable familial relationships.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
htuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 05:59 PM
Response to Original message
6. Without death, there's no sex
At least, there's no need for it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 04:25 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Science Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC