Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NASA criticised for sticking to imperial units (New Scientist)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Science Donate to DU
 
arenean Donating Member (230 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-25-09 03:29 AM
Original message
NASA criticised for sticking to imperial units (New Scientist)
Interesting debate going on in the 'comments' page after the article!

NASA criticised for sticking to imperial units




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
pokerfan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-25-09 02:28 PM
Response to Original message
1. So stupid


There is zero advantage to the metric system unless one first abandons the imperial system. The advantage comes from working within the system, not converting to and fro.

Imperial lengths:
A foot = 12 inches
A yard = 3 feet
A chain = 22 yards
A furlong = 10 chains
A mile = 8 furlongs

Wrong way to teach metric system:
An inch = 2.5400 centimeters
A centimeters = 0.3937 inches
A foot = 0.3048 meters
A meters = 3.2808 feet
A yard = 0.9144 meter
A meter = 1.0936 yards
A mile = 1.6093 kilometers
A kilometer = 0.6214 miles

Right way to teach metric system:
A meter = 100 centimeters
A kilometer = 1000 meters

As of 2008, all countries that used the imperial system have become officially metric, except for the United States, Burma and Liberia...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FiveGoodMen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-25-09 03:09 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Absolutely!
I've been saying for decades that the schools teach the metric system (if they still even teach it) about as poorly as one possibly could.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
qazplm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-26-09 07:32 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. regardless
the point is that the conversions are known, and there is only one known instance in the entirety of the space program of the different systems causing a problem.

I wish we put more money into NASA but it makes no sense to me to waste almost half a billion dollars to convert when that precious money can be doing science.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gtar100 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-26-09 02:54 AM
Response to Original message
3. In words, a great cartoon to drive this point home would be
a US ship attempting to dock with the International Space Station, and it doesn't fit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salvorhardin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-26-09 09:19 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Not really
There are various sized/types of docking ports on the ISS that are mostly standardized. For instance, both the Shuttle and Chinese Shenzhou spacecraft use the Androgynous Peripheral Attach System which goes all the way back to the Apollo-Soyuz days. Presumably the Soviet space shuttle Buran would have used this system too if it had ever flown. The ISS also has a Russian Probe and Cone mechanism which is not entirely dissimilar. When Orion starts flying the ISS will have to be reconfigured with the new Low Impact Docking System which is the succesor to APAS. There are also Pressurized Mating Adapters to interconnect two different docking systems.

It's fun to ridicule NASA for still using imperial units, but there's a whole gaggle of very expensive, already manufactured parts originally made for the Shuttles but will be repurposed for the Constellation program. There's a lot to criticize NASA for, and it would be nice if they finally joined the rest of the world in using the metric system entirely, but it's not like they don't plan for these sorts of things.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whyverne Donating Member (734 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-28-09 12:13 AM
Response to Original message
6. And Us Old Farts Like It That Way!
A foot is a foot, it's as big as my foot. I can measure things with my foot.

A meter has something to do with the Equator and the North Pole. Sure, that's something I can relate to. Not.

And don't get me started on Centigrade. I loathe it. Fahrenheit is beautiful. To just about everybody in the world 0 degrees is really cold and 100 degrees is really hot.

In Centigrade 0 degrees isn't all that cold and 100 degrees means everything is dead.

Pain in the butt French revolutionaries.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gtar100 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-28-09 01:57 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. What I like about the imperial system is the way it divides. Very natural.
12 6 4 3 2 1
10 5 2 1

1/2 1/4 1/8 1/16
0.5 0.25 0.125 0.0625

As a carpenter, it's eyeball easy to view halves or thirds. Maybe that's why it came out the way it did.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 04:39 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Science Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC