Kali
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Mar-07-08 11:33 AM
Original message |
house cleaning question - probably doesn't matter a bit |
|
I have AVG antivirus - it runs a scan automatically every day
I also have AVG anti spyware, adaware, and spybot s&d. My question: does it matter what order I run these? I know once somebody told me it did whith the first two but I can't remember or find that advice now.
Oh another fun question: How many e-mails can OE hold before it is "full" what is the most you have seen or had in the pile? hee hee, I'm not telling mine!:wow: :blush:
|
RoyGBiv
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Mar-07-08 11:47 AM
Response to Original message |
|
Depends on the version of Outlook you have, but if memory serves the maximum size for each .pst (the database file that holds the e-mails) was two 2 gigs prior to the 2003 version. I dunno what it is in later versions, just that it's big enough the whole thing can become irritatingly full.
Not sure about the ordering question. I always run Spybot S&D first, then AdAware, but that's out of habit. I've never used AVG's anti-spyware product.
|
trotsky
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Mar-07-08 09:49 PM
Response to Original message |
2. The main thing you have to worry about |
|
is one program scanning another's "quarantine" folder. Then they'll fight over the infected contents. Either don't use quarantines, or make sure to exclude the quarantine folders from scanning in each program.
Don't know about OE, but I've seen Outlook Inboxes with 24,000 messages. What matters is the total size - I think OE can probably only manage 2GB worth of data so be careful!
|
JPettus
(356 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Mar-07-08 10:06 PM
Response to Original message |
|
What I have found in Outlook is that there is no "maximum" number of emails that can be stored in the .pst file, but the larger it gets, the more likely you are to see corruption in the file itself (the .pst is still essentially a database that manages all the information and emails, and computer crashes with the email client up can have an adverse effect on the stability of that file). When the .pst is finally too corrupted to be opened and used, you will have a problem opening Outlook.
Should that happen, the best thing you can do is to be sure you have a backup of the .pst files, and to try to first run scanpst.exe on the .pst files and if that doesn't resolve your problem, go back to your backup.
In my home use of Outlook (and, I'm assuming, OE) I've seen that the client sets up it's own .pst file for the files downloaded from POP servers, so the same rules should apply.
Regarding the spyware scans, you mainly don't run multiple scans at the same time because you don't want the applications to accidentally try to grab and lock the same file at the same time. Scans can also be resource-intensive, so if you don't have plenty of RAM and a good processor, you can slow the machine way down. It shouldn't really matter much in what order you run the scans (though I plead ignorance to running AVG antispyware scans). I've seen no difference in running either order with Spybot and AdAware. They search according to what's in their signature file and each will find some things that the others don't while both will find some of the same things: whichever program you run first will find all or nearly all of the common vulnerabilities in their signature files and the second scan will pick up the rest.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Mon May 06th 2024, 11:54 PM
Response to Original message |