Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Navy tries to ease worry over sub nuke leak

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Veterans Donate to DU
 
unhappycamper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-08 07:27 AM
Original message
Navy tries to ease worry over sub nuke leak


Fast-attack sub Houston
Commanders in Japan calm the public.


Navy tries to ease worry over sub nuke leak
Staff report
Posted : Wednesday Aug 6, 2008 6:23:48 EDT

The Navy continued trying to tamp down worry across the Pacific Ocean on Tuesday by telling people there was no risk from the radiation leaked for months by a nuclear-powered attack submarine.

The Los Angeles-class fast-attack submarine Houston, commissioned in 1982, began discharging small amounts of radioactive water around five months ago, according to reports, prompting worries about the boat’s port calls in Guam, Japan and its return to port in Pearl Harbor, where the leak was discovered in late July.

A preliminary environmental survey found no elevated radiation levels in the waters off Guam attributable to a visit in May and June from the Houston, according to a letter from the Navy to Guam Gov. Felix Camacho.

Likewise, commanders in Japan were trying to calm public worries over the port visit of another nuclear-powered Los Angeles-class attack sub, the La Jolla, just a few days after Japanese authorities revealed the Navy had alerted them about the Houston’s leak. According to local news reports, government officials in Japan were upset that they learned about the radiation worries from a report on CNN, rather than having been told by the U.S. Navy or the Japanese foreign ministry.

The La Jolla’s visit to Naval Base Sasebo had already been scheduled as part of its Western Pacific deployment.


Rest of article at: http://www.navytimes.com/news/2008/08/navy_subworries_080508w/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Submariner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-08 07:31 AM
Response to Original message
1. As you can see, the radiation never affected me when I rode on the boats
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe_VB Donating Member (336 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-08 07:39 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Thats funny.....
I always knew you bubbleheads were a strange bunch.....and in reference to the above story, the last time I was in Sasebo the only sub there was the USS Darter.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
driver8 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-08 08:31 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. Joe, you live in Chesapeake?
During my time stationed in Norfolk, I lived in Virginia Beach.

My friends who still live there tell me that I wouldn't even recognize the place now -- so much growth and expansion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
driver8 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-08 08:29 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. What boat were you on? What was your rate?
I'm an ex-MM nuc.

I was a sub volunteer, but ended up on the USS Dwight D. Eisenhower.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Submariner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-08 10:40 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. My Bad.....I was funning nooky-poos
I was a smelly EM3ss on the pigboats, that's why we needed a mannequin for a love life. Croaker/246 (decomm crew), Becuna/319 (qual boat), and Sailfish/572, which one of the glowboats sunk last year.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zapHPqOryC0
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
driver8 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-08 11:04 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. nooky-poos...that's funny!
When did you serve?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Submariner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-08 11:31 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. '65 through '69
Mostly back and forth ops between Cuba/Puerto Rico and north of Greenland a bit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doug.Goodall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-08 08:11 AM
Response to Original message
3. But it was just a little leak, and we caught it in only six months!
We don't want any foreign naves tracking our submarines by following radioactive discharge water from the nuclear reactors.

Oh, and we care about the environment too!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 09:30 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Veterans Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC