Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

God's Abstinence Only Initiative failed. Now what?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » DU Groups » Science & Skepticism » Atheists and Agnostics Group Donate to DU
 
displacedtexan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-06-05 09:17 AM
Original message
God's Abstinence Only Initiative failed. Now what?
God (aka the god of Abraham) tried it in Genesis. It failed miserably.

What's next... Divine Planned Parenthood?

(I wrote about this on my blog today. I expect hatemail.)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
eek MD Donating Member (249 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-06-05 10:34 AM
Response to Original message
1. Hmm, he can always try ...
Coitus Interruptus... :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fshrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-06-05 01:52 PM
Response to Original message
2. Psychosis.
Very powerful. Can be vaguely controlled with medications, in which case it makes people easier to handle. Gaining momentum.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Commie Pinko Dirtbag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-05 03:33 PM
Response to Original message
3. Hey, I just thought up a great name for an abstinence initiative!
God's Abstinence Youth. How about it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Book Lover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-05 05:16 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. You mean the Junior Anti-Sex League?
The aim of the Party was not merely to prevent men and women from forming loyalties which it might not be able to control. Its real, undeclared purpose was to remove all pleasure from the sexual act. Not love so much as eroticism was the enemy, inside marriage as well as outside it. All marriages between Party members had to be approved by a committee appointed for the purpose, and -- though the principle was never clearly stated -- permission was always refused if the couple concerned gave the impression of being physically attracted to one another. The only recognized purpose of marriage was to beget children for the service of the Party. Sexual intercourse was to be looked on as a slightly disgusting minor operation, like having an enema. This again was never put into plain words, but in an indirect way it was rubbed into every Party member from childhood onwards. There were even organizations such as the Junior Anti-Sex League, which advocated complete celibacy for both sexes. All children were to be begotten by artificial insemination (artsem, it was called in Newspeak) and brought up in public institutions. This, Winston was aware, was not meant altogether seriously, but somehow it fitted in with the general ideology of the Party. The Party was trying to kill the sex instinct, or, if it could not be killed, then to distort it and dirty it. He did not know why this was so, but it seemed natural that it should be so. And as far as the women were concerned, the Party's efforts were largely successful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
displacedtexan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-11-05 08:23 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. Explain how a man expels semen sans pleasure.
As I recall, that's never addressed in 1984.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Book Lover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-11-05 06:26 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Good point
As a female, I'm hardly the expert, but good point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fshrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-05 11:36 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. Ho! he can!
With certain types of neuroses, ejaculation can be achieved without pleasure or can even be felt as painful. As all religious authorities know full well, neurosis is the way to go!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fshrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-05 08:47 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. That makes GAY as acronym !!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 08:29 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » DU Groups » Science & Skepticism » Atheists and Agnostics Group Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC