http://www.salon.com/politics/war_room/2006/11/21/clinton/index.html ...Where did all the money go? Although the outcome of her race was never in doubt, Kornblut and Zeleny say Clinton spent "upward of $30 million" on her reelection run, more than any other candidate for the Senate this year. Advertising and fundraising ate up $17 million, Kornblut and Zeleny say, and "tens of thousands of dollars a month" went to "an assortment of consultants and aides."
We'll presume that Clinton didn't need all of those consultants and aides to help her figure out how to beat John Spencer, whom she sent packing back to Yonkers with a 67-31 percent win. And all those advertising and fundraising expenditures could certainly bring dividends along the road to 2008. But if Clinton and her supporters thought some of her appeal would come from her inevitability, maybe folks on her campaign staff are thinking twice now about, say, the $160,000 they spent on travel by private jet, or the $27,000 for valet parking, or the $13,000 for flowers.
Clinton's advisors had predicted she'd have $20 million to $30 million on hand as she began to make plans for a White House run. Now she's down to somewhere around $14 million. That still may be more than any other Democratic candidate had, but it's not categorically more anymore. Which leads us to ask: If Hillary isn't inevitable, is she all that attractive to her fellow Democrats?
-- Tim Grieve