The reason the Right loves and needs her is that she repeatedly tries to de-masculinize Democratic leaders with her slanderous speech. They want to stand out as the "strong" party and their leaders are actually not strong, either morally or in a military-background sort of way. Since they have little they can point to about their own strength, they try undermine the other side's.
This is why they attacked Kerry's heroic military service, and why Coulter called Edwards a f*****. It's also why they wanted to paint him as elitist and all of that other crap--French--as if French men aren't quite as masculine as regular Americans. (huh?) And Edwards was the "Breck girl" of course.
Since when does criticizing the other side automatically give you the opposite trait? It's craven and cowardly--and all of those insecure chickenhawks repubs who were too afraid to ever join the miliary or even live morally strong lives just eat it all up.
http://www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/2007/03/06/cult/index.html
Coulter insisted last night that she did not intend the remark as an anti-gay slur -- that she did not intend to suggest that John Edwards, husband and father, was gay -- but instead only used the word as a "schoolyard taunt," to call him a sissy. And that is true. Her aim was not to suggest that Edwards is actually gay, but simply to feminize him like they do with all male Democratic or liberal political leaders.
For multiple reasons, nobody does that more effectively or audaciously than Coulter, which is why they need her so desperately and will never jettison her. How could they possibly shun her for engaging in tactics on which their entire movement depends? They cannot, which is why they are not and will not.
The converse of this is equally true. As critical as it is to them to feminize Democratic and liberal males (and to masculinize the women), even more important is to create false images of masculine power and strength around their authority figures. The reality of this masculine power is almost always non-existent. The imagery is what counts.
This works exactly the same as the images of moral purity that they work so hard to manufacture, whereby the leaders they embrace -- such as Gingrich, Limbaugh, Bill Bennett, even the divorced and estranged-from-his-children Ronald Reagan and Coulter herself -- are plauged by the most morally depraved and reckless personal lives, yet still parade around as the heroes of the "Values Voters." Just as what matters is that their leaders prance around as moral leaders (even while deviating as far as they want from those standards), what matters to them also is that their leaders play-act as strong and masculine figures, even when there is no basis, no reality, to the play-acting.
A good read--worth reading the whole thing.
Oh and by the way--I guess only Repubs are allowed to make jokes--when a Dem tries to make one, and misses one little word, the heavens come crashing down. But Coulter is allowed to say whatever and be defended by the likes of Sean Hannity. :eyes: