Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Kerry gives an interview to the Boston Herald.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » DU Groups » Democrats » John Kerry Group Donate to DU
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-15-08 06:55 AM
Original message
Kerry gives an interview to the Boston Herald.
Well, it seems the good senator gave a lenghty interview to the good people of the Herald Tribune. And, given that we are speaking of the Herald here, the result is not that bad. If you succeed in ignoring the gratuitous comments (most of them not that bad), we learn that Kerry has a plan to modernize the rail infrastructure, want to promote clean energy, thinks that terror alert system was misused (that is really news to them?), and refuses to answer to them about what would have been a Kerry presidency.

Altogether a great interview, I think.



http://news.bostonherald.com/business/general/view/2008_07_15_Kerry_eyes_clean_energy:_Says_new_plan_would_boost_U_S__economy/srvc=home&position=also

Kerry eyes clean energy
Says new plan would boost U.S. economy
By Christine McConville

America can restore its world-class economic strength, U.S. Sen. John Kerry (D-Mass.) said yesterday, if it directs its technological and entrepreneurial drive to producing clean energy.

“We need a massive new Manhattan Project for alternative energy,” Kerry said in an hour-long interview with Boston Herald editors and reporters.
...

During yesterday’s interview, Kerry was relaxed, except when he talked about the growing gap between the super-rich and the rest of the people.

He said Americans are fed up with the current administration because of the tax breaks it has granted to the wealthiest people
...


http://news.bostonherald.com/news/regional/politics/view/2008_07_15_Terror_alerts_misused__Sen__John_Kerry_says/srvc=home&position=also

Terror alerts misused, Sen. John Kerry says
Hillary Chabot By Hillary Chabot
Sen. John Kerry yesterday strongly suggested that President George W. Bush used the terror alert system created after the 2001 terrorist attacks to boost his political campaign during the 2004 election.

Kerry said in an interview with the Herald: “We had red alerts and orange alerts and all these alerts. We haven’t had an alert since the election.”

Republicans immediately attacked the statement, saying Kerry has a misguided viewpoint on the war in Iraq.


http://news.bostonherald.com/news/national/politics/general/view/2008_07_15_Kerry_rails_at_Acela:_Pushes__1B_in_fixes_to_speed_up_train/srvc=home&position=0

Sen. John F. Kerry rails at Acela
Pushes $1B in fixes to speed up train
Hillary Chabot By Hillary Chabot

U.S. Sen. John F. Kerry is taking aim at the Acela bullet train, saying the 8-year-old line meant to zip passengers between Boston and Washington is riddled with speed and safety issues that have thrown its swift mission off track.

“Are you kidding? That train can go 150 miles an hour, (but) it goes that for, what, a couple of miles?” Kerry scoffed. “I want America to have a first-rate high-speed rail system. A high-speed rail that really lives up to the name and gets people there in the time that we ought to be aiming for.”

Kerry plans to file in two weeks a $1 billion bill that will target out-of-date bridges, tunnels and tracks that prevent the train from hitting its 150-mile-per-hour maximum and getting commuters to their destinations faster.
...


Too bad that Megan Egan did not get that four years ago and that, in fact, she still does not get it and smears Obama in her recent editorial.

http://news.bostonherald.com/news/opinion/columnists/view/2008_07_15_Fumble_in__04_cost_us_big_time/srvc=home&position=recent

Fumble in ’04 cost us big time

Asked whether he ever gets up in the morning and ponders what he might have done as President John Forbes Kerry, Sen. John Forbes Kerry said yesterday he did not want to go there.

“To go there is to solicit an article that says Kerry is wistful.”
...
ell let me be wistful on his behalf. As Kerry rattled off one policy initiative after another yesterday, I kept thinking that his brain is about 100 times bigger than that of our foggy, confused, pushed around by his Machiavellian advisers, can-I-ever-get-a-sentence-out-straight embarrassment of a president.

So Kerry’s a tough-to-warm-up-to stiff. So what.

We really blew it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-15-08 06:57 AM
Response to Original message
1. Seems the Acela plan is what the media will remember. I have heard it on TV this morning and it is
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Luftmensch067 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-15-08 07:44 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. I remember hearing JK talk about high-speed rail in Feb. 2005
Edited on Tue Jul-15-08 07:44 AM by Luftmensch067
I'm sure he was talking about it before that, but that was when I first became aware of his interest in this issue. I think he has been a visionary on this, and I hope and pray his determination moves mountains (or at least fixes bridges!), as it so often has.

Edited to add: thanks so much, Mass, for posting these Herald links!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MBS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-15-08 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. beautifully said, luftmensch. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Noisy Democrat Donating Member (799 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-15-08 10:02 AM
Response to Original message
3. Awesome set of links -- thanks so much! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beachmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-15-08 11:30 AM
Response to Original message
4. I'm starting to read the articles, and this line got my goat:
The world needs to discover new ways to power vehicles and heat homes, he said. “America can’t drill its way out of this crisis,” he said, echoing the position of billionaire green-energy crusader T. Boone Pickens.

Try Pickens slightly echoing Kerry, BoHe!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MBS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-15-08 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. oh, wow. 180 degrees off-base. sigh. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-15-08 02:41 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. i responded to that - showing kerry said it in 2005 and it is in the Senate record
The quote was of saying that everywhere in 2004.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Island Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-15-08 04:46 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. I remember JK saying that duing the '04 campaign.
I'm sure he said it before that as well, but I wasn't paying attention. Jeez. Reporters should really do their homework better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fedupinBushcountry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-15-08 07:45 PM
Response to Reply #4
13. This from May 6, 2004
Edited on Tue Jul-15-08 07:45 PM by fedupinBushcountry
"The United States of America can't drill its way out of this predicament," Kerry said. "We have to invent our way out of it." http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/03/30/election.main/index.html">link
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-15-08 08:22 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Wow! Kerry is quoting TBone in advance
Anyone can do it afterwards! They also have to know that - they have covered him -even on this issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fedupinBushcountry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-15-08 08:50 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. Just found this
At the Massachusetts State Convention in July 2003, John Kerry was unequivocal about the importance of this: "Now we must engage in the greatest challenge of all. We must decide that just as President Kennedy challenged us to go to the moon in the 1960s, we will 'go to the moon' right here on earth by declaring that never again will young American soldiers, men and women, be held hostage to our dependency on Middle East oil. We need a president who will boldly set America on the path to energy independence. God only gave us 3 percent of the world's oil reserves. There is no metaphysical or miraculous way for us to drill our way out of a 60 percent foreign oil dependency. We have to invent our way out of it and I want American jobs and American ingenuity leading the way." We can do this by investing in energy efficiency, modern electric infrastructure, and renewables like solar and wind, and by putting an end to the corporate welfare that subsidizes obsolete technologies. A great model is the new Apollo Project, a $300 billion program proposed by unions and environmental groups to create 3 million new jobs while reducing America's foreign oil dependence over the next ten years.

We can do it by investing in technologies that bring us closer to realizing the hydrogen future, the next generation of hybrid cars, mass transit options that are clean, fast, and more convenient, and "green buildings"--energy-efficient homes and offices. We should also make LEED (the environmental standard by which green buildings are designed) the standard for all new buildings, which would result in huge energy savings and an enormous improvement in urban environments.

It surely does not make any sense that China's fuel economy standards exceed our own, or that Congress has actually undone energy efficiency standards, leaving us more firmly than ever in the clutches of imported oil. The Democratic nominee must promise not only to make us oil-independent from foreign countries harboring terrorists, but also to make our government independent of the interests of Big Oil and the outmoded policies crafted to serve it.http://ariannaonline.huffingtonpost.com/books/fools/contract.php">link( Wow that was what Arianna Huffington put on her blog post back then)


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-15-08 09:04 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. Here's the Senate record - April 18, 2002 (and he spoke of saying it the day before)
Mr. President, as chairman of the Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship, I am pleased to join my colleague, Senator Landrieu, in introducing an amendment regarding the need to assist more small businesses become energy efficient.

This legislation reinforces a small business amendment that Senator Landrieu and I put forth last week regarding the Energy Star Program. It was successfully adopted as part of the Energy Policy Act of 2002, and I thank Senators BINGAMAN and MURKOWSKI for that.

There is an obvious missing player in our efforts to increase the number of small businesses that are using or developing products and processes that save energy, and it is the Small Business Administration. This amendment directs the Administration to develop and coordinate a government-wide program that educates small firms about the cost-benefits and business advantages of energy efficiency.

I was astounded to learn last year, during a hearing I held on the business of environmental technologies, that SBA is not actively working with DoE and the EPA to advertise their joint program for promoting energy efficiency of small business. This is particularly hard to understand given that there is so much work to be done. There are an estimated 25 million small businesses in this country, and they account for more than half of all the commercial energy used in North America. However, according to Paul Stolpman, who testified on behalf of the EPA, only 3,000 small businesses have partnered with EPA in committing to improve their energy performance.

I am not criticizing the EPA or the Department of Energy; they have a good initiative, and I support their efforts. I am simply pointing out that there are millions of small businesses left to reach, millions of opportunities to reduce energy consumption in this country. It is basic common sense that SBA could help significantly in that effort. After all the financial hardships small businesses suffered over the last couple of years because of price spikes and unreliability, energy isn't even a prominent issue on SBA's website.

To illustrate the power of education and the need to coordinate outreach efforts through the SBA, I would like to share a story about one of the small businesses in my home State of Massachusetts that benefitted greatly from making energy modifications. Carl Faulkner is the owner of the Williams Inn in Williamstown. Years ago, he was approached by his energy company to receive a free energy audit and rebates to off-set the cost of upgrading his lighting systems. It seemed like a good idea, so he went ahead and took them up on their offer. After all was said and done, between the rebates and his new energy savings, he recovered his expenses in just 1 month. But that is not the end of the story. The results of those simple changes were so positive that he was inspired to learn even more about energy savings and to investigate where else his business was losing money on unnecessary energy usage. Since then he has put on special roofing, replaced air conditioner units, put insulation around pipes, and installed meters to determine when and where his business uses the most energy. With this information, Mr. Faulkner can bring down usage, saving even more energy and money.

These simple changes have yielded vast results. In January and February, he saved more than $10,000. Mr. Faulkner now considers energy efficiency a never-ending process. He says if it weren't for outreach, he never would have made these important changes to
business. He changed his business from one that was consuming energy at an unmonitored level to one that has an energy management system that allows him to identify other savings.

In addition to increasing energy efficiency of small businesses in order to reduce consumption, to reduce pollution, and to reduce reliance on foreign oil, there is a need for Federal agencies to increase their work with small business to research and develop new technologies and processes that are more energy efficient. In 1999, the SBA investigated the role of small business in technological innovation and found that when a market demands progress, change, and evolution, small firms play a key role. Just looking back to 1997, there were more than 33,000 small firms operating in the environmental industry, with combined revenues of $52 billion. That is billion. In Massachusetts alone, environmental technology businesses employ more than 30,000. No matter how you cut it, revenues, jobs, pollution reduction, energy supply, national security, there is a very good reason to encourage the innovation of efficient technology. And the Federal Government needs to make a serious effort to use small businesses to do that research and development as much as possible. At the very least, I would like to see a focus on these topics through the small business research and development projects through the Small Business Innovation Research and Small Business Technology Transfer initiatives. We have got the finest research universities in the world and certainly the most dynamic small business sector. I want a coordinated and heightened effort to use these resources for national energy policy.

As I said yesterday when we were debating the proposal to drill in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, we cannot drill our way out of our energy problem. We must innovate our way out of our energy problem. Not just innovation in more fuel efficient cars, but also appliances. If the Bush administration would fully implement efficiency standards for appliances that were issued in 1997 and last year, the Department of Energy estimates the total savings to business and consumers to be $27 billion by 2030. Why? Simply because of less energy use and generally less demand when using more efficient appliances. We can go further with more innovation. And we need to use Federal agencies to increase the interplay between small businesses, innovation, and the Nation's environmental and energy goals.

I thank Senator Landrieu for offering this amendment. And again I thank Senators BINGAMAN and MURKOWSKI, and their staffs, for their help in passing this small business amendment
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beachmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-15-08 10:04 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. Holy toledo -- 2002!!??!! Looks like the BoHe's error has been
easily shown. And Fedup's link shows it was when everyone was paying attention in the presidential election of 2004.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MBS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-15-08 06:12 PM
Response to Original message
9. I read the comments to the Acela article, and thought to myself,
how does this man stand this stuff? Thank goodness he does, as, these days, he's almost the only politician out there who saves me from utter despair about the future of our country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
politicasista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-15-08 06:46 PM
Response to Original message
10. Thanks
Even though the bashers/haters came out in the LBN thread. (Not suprising though).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-15-08 06:54 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. and thanks for your back up
Edited on Tue Jul-15-08 06:56 PM by karynnj
:) These are extremely juvenile people, who think saying these things makes them cool or edgy. The fact is that there was no reason for it. The only one I was really disappointed is in one who has made intelligent posts - he knows better. There was only one that should be deleted - and I think my response goes up to the edge of deserving deletion.

The interesting thing is the tone of some of today's articles - especially Margery Eagan's that made it clear that we could have have the brilliant thoughtful Kerry - but the country chose the unacceptable alternative - even though she repeated nearly every RW theme - even mocking that he calls his wife ----by her name, imagine that. This is in a right wing paper. He also gave intelligent interesting answers to things like the rail and energy questions.

Now, many readers might still think they don't "like" Kerry, but they are at least getting a chance to hear his comments. I doubt you will suddenly have a JK fan club at the Boston Herald, but there is little said (other than crediting Pickens with Kerry's line) that is really bad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
politicasista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-15-08 07:09 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Exactly and
No problem :).

I am in the **crickets** phase these days. (I know that's not fair to post that, but I notice every time one post a rebuttal, there isn't a response, not all the time, but some times.) Kind of surprising that some replies came from peeps that are usually ok, but there is a lot of cynicism right now and never letting go of 04. (Go figure).

I agree about the Herald. Despite the smears on him and Obama, they let him speak. Still a yucky RW rag. :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-16-08 06:34 AM
Response to Original message
18. I knew that an Boston Herald interview could not be fully good. Of course,
rather than staying on the important facts, they spawned every single things.

Of course, Kerry said no such thing, but do not expect people to read and try to understand what he actually said. So, this endorsement of Lieberman is going to hurt (even if this is not what he is doing-the quote does not have anything to do with the Lieberman chairmanship).

http://news.bostonherald.com/news/2008/view.bg?articleid=1107333

Kerry backs Lieberman despite support for MacCain
Hillary Chabot By Hillary Chabot
Wednesday, July 16, 2008 - Added 8h ago
+ Recent Articles + Email

EmailE-mail PrintablePrintable Comments(6) Comments LargerSmallerText size ShareShare Rate(0) Rate

U.S. Sen. John F. Kerry says his colleague Joe Lieberman’s backing of John McCain’s presidential bid and potential speaking role at the GOP convention should not prompt Democrats to strip him of his Senate chairmanship.

“I’m not one for retribution. I think that we got to work together, folks. We got to get the job done. We have bigger fish to fry than that. I think people expect more of us than that right now,” Kerry told the Herald.


Another editorial attacking Kerry and Obama (well, once again having Kerry say thing he does not say- I will not campaign for Obama). -- Kerry doing class warfare ? Seriously? Because he is not blind and knows poor people will get higher mortgage rate. Comeon--

I wished that the Herald made the interview available, because the piecemeal, take a sentence out of contest approach is painful, and is aimed at hurting Kerry, not helping.
http://news.bostonherald.com/news/opinion/op_ed/view/2008_07_16_Kerry_s_in_fighting_form:_Won_t_take_foes_lightly/srvc=home&position=recent
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-16-08 07:53 AM
Response to Original message
19. And, of course, the non existing quote about Lieberman was reproduced by
Edited on Wed Jul-16-08 07:54 AM by Mass
http://www.politickerma.com/benbreier/372/wake-call-wednesday-july-16-2008

Come on senator. You should know better than to give the Herald sentences like that, particularly after having been tough on Lieberman all along.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-20-08 08:21 AM
Response to Reply #19
20. This actually sounds more like Kerry not wanting to make news
There has been no mainstream Democrat who has said that Leiberman should be kicked out or stripped of his roles. The only person who lost his chairs that I can think of is Larry Craig. It would be news had Kerry answered yes. There have been Democrats who endorsed Republicans and visa versa in the past and though it does lead to them being in disfavor with the party, I don't remember it leading to being kicked out. (Now if he gives a hateful Zell Miller speech that will be different.)

Turn it around - what if Hagel, Lugar or McCain had endorsed Kerry with a respectful endorsement that spoke of him being the better choice and speaking of how hard making this decision was would we see that as a reason for them to be thrown out? DU hates Leiberman, but there is clear that he is voting his conscience on Iraq - and he is a Democrat on most matters. Kerry did work hard for Lamont and I love Lamont's endorsement of Kerry. There is no one who has fought Leiberman harder on the issues he needs to be fought on.

Additionally, this shows the same lack of vindictiveness that Kerry has always shown. (and is why though I can picture Clinton, Bush, McCain and of course Nixon all having enemies list (and at some time or another Kerry was likely on each0, I can't see Kerry having one.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MBS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-20-08 10:03 AM
Response to Reply #20
21. yes, his lack of vindictiveness is remarkable, and
speaks to his strength, grace, and class. A-1 person.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wisteria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-20-08 11:39 AM
Response to Reply #20
22. Agree.n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 12:57 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » DU Groups » Democrats » John Kerry Group Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC