|
Until the election results hit, I heard Kerry's heart felt statement that this was the most important election of our lives and understood and would have agreed with it if asked, but I had not really internalized it or completely thought out its ramifications. Since then, I've asked why I feel so differently about us losing this election than other elections.
Part of the difference is an almost child-like cry within me that. "it was not fair". Any administration in power uses their position to help in their re-election, but the use of bogus terror warnings goes beyond anything I've ever seen. Coupled with the broadcast media's blatant support for the President, the deck never has seemed so stacked against a challenger. I still feel that if the media had fairly shown both Bush and Kerry, the better man would have won. In spite of the bias, Kerry almost won.
Since the election, the fact that the Republicans, who control all three branches of government are still whining about any limits to their power and actively working to consolidate their gains to achieve permanent control of the country. It's clear that only total power would make them happy - and even then they would still find a way to blame those of us with no power for their failings.
It does seem though that many other people have also seen through the veil of normal every day life to see that there have been major changes in how our government is functioning. It's ironic that the excess media/government involvement in the Schaivo mess may more than anything have caused people who were uninvolved to see the direction we are moving in.
Over the last 6 months, I've been amazed at Kerry's positive approach to energizing people to fight back, consider their values and take back their government. It's made it harder in a way, because it made it clearer what we lost. (Both in terms of what the government is doing versus what it could be doing and in recognition that Kerry is more than simply an attractive, liberal candidate.)
However, it may be that this loss may result in a new wave of grassroots involvement around "felt needs" (Tay Tay, thanks for all your comments on this) that Kerry and others have been pushing for. This might be a needed period of re-establishing what the Democratic party stands for and re-invigorating the local parties. Kerry seems to be one of the leaders both in trying to involve people to became the new refreshed grassroots and in defining what he thinks are our values.
Kerry has to be the only losing candidate ever to be involved in an effort to engender activist Democratic grassroots. In hindsight, the Democrats haven't had much activist type energy at least since the end of the 70s, while unfortunately the Republicans have. As the entire New Deal is now under attack, there should be a resurgence of Democrats.
At the beginning, it almost looked like tilting at windmills, Kerry as Don Quixote (why not - it fits with King Arthur and Robin Hood), but, in spite of sarcastic press and being part of the minority, he has had at least some success. Even the failures (like ANWR) have placed the Republicans on record against the public. The Republicans can lose on what they did with Small Business - it's pretty cynical to vote 100-0 then simply take it out in conference. For Frist, this is a huge flip-flop.
Anyway, I am more hopeful now than in November. I still remember how unexpectedly euphoric I felt on Nov 2 with local Democrats hearing the exit poll numbers. It was like getting a fantastic present that then faded and disappeared before my eyes. (In contrast I went to an election night party in 1972, after cheering MA and DC - we turned off the TV, ate the food and played Beatles music, the balm of all pain. After canvassing in NJ, none of us were surprised at the loss.) But, the Democrats were great, so far, in staying together and articulating well the SS issue - it's actually funny that the talking heads are going back to the same talking points of the Democrats have no plan. (Didn't people reject that only 3 months ago!)
Historically, the Democrats controlled everything for several presidential terms. During the time of FDR and than after the LBJ landslide, the story was the Republican party was dead - it wasn't. The Democratic party isn't now. We may even be at a cross roads where we actually define ourselves. I hope we choose a set of values that encompass the values expressed by this group's leader. Imagine Kerry (or another moderate or Liberal Democrat) running as head of a re-invigorated Democratic party that is in unabashedly standing for the types of American values Kerry has articulated.
|