Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The President: On Soma--or in a Coma?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » DU Groups » Democrats » John Kerry Group Donate to DU
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-02-05 01:24 PM
Original message
The President: On Soma--or in a Coma?
Edited on Fri Dec-02-05 01:29 PM by Mass
I thought this posed the problem very well (Though Bush fits well in the aristocracy part himself, he ran as if he was an ordinary man).

http://www.freezerbox.com/archive/blog.php?id=161

The President: On Soma--or in a Coma?
BY RUSS WELLEN
12.02.2005 08:07 | DISPATCHES

Former Secretary of State Colin Powell's chief of staff Lawrence Wilkerson, who's set a new benchmark for administration turncoats, says President Bush was "too aloof, too distant from the details" of post-war planning.

...
After Bush's speech at the Naval Academy Wednesday the New York Times commented, in an editorial no less:

"A president who seems less in touch with reality than Richard Nixon needs to get out more."
...

At first, the one positive that could be drawn from his "election" in 2000 was that the US, once and for all, had finally outgrown its infatuation with royalty and aristocracy.

Patrician types like John Kerry start out with two strikes against them. Franklin Roosevelt, not to mention Washington or Jefferson, might not even make it out of the electoral starting gate today. Also lost in the wash, however, is intellect. Not only do we shy away from those of a higher station, but those of greater intelligence.

The times are way too challenging for the US to do the Ronald Reagan-figurehead thing anymore. We need a president who's engaged, like even Richard Nixon (if a little too invested, as they say, per recently released White House tapes)....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-02-05 01:35 PM
Response to Original message
1. True,
but there are stiill who value intelligence. I think a big chunk of them, including some among the 59 million who were just against Bush, voted for Kerry.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueIris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-02-05 11:54 PM
Response to Original message
2. Nice catch, Mass. Although, "Patrician"? Oh, for fuck's sake.
Could people please GIVE THAT UP ALREADY?

Sorry. I just think we should really be past trying to find not-so-clever ways to insinuate that Kerry is a snob. Jesus.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whometense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-03-05 02:52 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Sometimes I think
Edited on Sat Dec-03-05 02:53 PM by whometense
people confuse simple dignity with a patrician attitude. There's nothing patrician about Kerry at all. He's just slightly reserved (and I'm not even sure that's true any more - he used to be slightly reserved) and carries himself with dignity.

Personally, I'll vote for a person of dignity to be president any day over a "just like the slob next door" type. Every time I see Kerry on tv I think to myself that he has the stature (and not just physically) to represent our country in the world.

*??? Not in a million years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleClarkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-03-05 04:35 PM
Response to Original message
4. They lost me with that "outgrown its infatuation" thing
Bush is of a higher station. He does have a pedigree. His father used to talk about getting a "splash" of coffee. He grew up more in the lap of luxury than Kerry.

He only pretends to be a common man. So "royalty" can still make it if it pretends it's something it's not. And someone with the appearance of "royalty" if not the actual wealth or station (like Kerry's having the Forbes name and the manners of someone who was raised to be a gentleman) will be flushed, apparently.

Superficiality above all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenndar Donating Member (911 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-03-05 04:38 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. This is what most drives me nuts about Bush. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-03-05 04:48 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. he is, but he tried to hide it as much as he could, so the point is not
Edited on Sat Dec-03-05 04:50 PM by Mass
that bad.

Bush was elected partly because people bought in the myth of him being an average fellow (I mean not from a wealthy and old family. Obviously, he is a less than average fellow when it comes to IQ).

I would agree with the fact that nobody should be elected because of his name or his birth. This is why I am so bothered by the fact that people want to run Hillary because she is a Clinton or that some people are talking of Robert Kennedy Jr running because of his father. It is plain wrong.

This said, this should not disqualify somebody who is the best qualified to be president to win, and unfortunately, this is what is happening because of a fake populism that exists in the same way in the left and in the right:

- Some people wanted to run Edwards ONLY because he was not born rich (the same way some people want to run Warner ONLY because he is a southern Governor). They dont care whether they are competent or not.

- On the right, they created this fake impression that Bush was the ordinary fellow you want to drink a beer with.

If anything, the thing we must run on for our next nominee is that he is COMPETENT to be president. Let's just hope we select somebody who is because clearly some people on our side do not think it is important.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 04:06 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » DU Groups » Democrats » John Kerry Group Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC