Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Anyone watching the senate?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » DU Groups » Democrats » John Kerry Group Donate to DU
 
whometense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-02-06 02:45 PM
Original message
Anyone watching the senate?
Leahy's giving a wonderful speech about the Patriot Act. It sounds like he plans to vote against it? At least he's very unhappy with it. And he's slammed the Bushies pretty hard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-02-06 02:51 PM
Response to Original message
1. Great speech - He did another one yesterday
As far as I understood, he is planning to vote NO (but I am not 100 % sure).

We will know soon. Final vote at 3 pm.

I know I have been rambling on that, but given the way the Democrats have been treated both on the House and the Senate on this, I dont see why they are running to vote the Act like that. They had a chance to force a renegotiation on Tuesday and they missed it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whometense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-02-06 02:57 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. I admit to having been somewhat
disengaged on it. The whole thing makes my head hurt. Leahy seemed to explain the process pretty well. Maybe they are just convinced this is the most they'll get? Hatch was predictably bitter about those who were standing in the way and insisting on civil liberties protections (tsk, tsk) What a creep he is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenndar Donating Member (911 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-02-06 02:55 PM
Response to Original message
2. Leahy really impressed me today.
He's just so good at opposing the issue without politicizing it, and his promise to keep working on the PA was reassuring. And of course, I thought calling the administration "legislative Darwinists" was beyond brilliant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-02-06 02:59 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. I also liked he acknowledged the difficulty of the vote
Edited on Thu Mar-02-06 03:04 PM by Mass
and the fact that you are in front a difficult choice between voting for a bill that improves things and voting against a bill that falls short of improving it enough.

No "I am a hero because I vote like that"! That was good to hear.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whometense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-02-06 03:07 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. He did vote no,
as did Durbin. Kennedy voted for it. I'm confused.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-02-06 03:10 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Me too.
Edited on Thu Mar-02-06 03:12 PM by Mass
Particularly for Durbin who said he would support it.

The following voted against cloture but are voting for the bill.

Boxer AYE? Even more surprising.

Dodd AYE
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whometense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-02-06 03:13 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Patty Murray - NO
Edited on Thu Mar-02-06 03:14 PM by whometense
What is going on???

Kerry - AYE
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-02-06 03:15 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Dont know - Some of the most liberal democrats are apparently voting AYE
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whometense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-02-06 03:18 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. I have no idea.
My inclination is to trust JK - he certainly has a reason for voting the way he did. I am curious, though.

There will undoubtedly be a big yell in GD and at Kos that he "chickened out" or some such, but with Boxer and Kennedy voting the same way, it's hard to see how that sticks. It seems like the easiest thing for him would have been to vote no.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-02-06 03:22 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. There is already one thread by one of our favorites on this base
because of course he wants to run, so he should not have voted for it. Kennedy and Boxer dont want to run, so they dont matter. (What a logic)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-02-06 03:26 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. What's amazing was how predictable the response
Edited on Thu Mar-02-06 03:32 PM by karynnj
was, down to who were the key responders. Some have no more concept than a 2 yr old that in negotiation you have to occasionally give in. The key might be that if they had won cloture and had another round of negotiations, nothing would improve and it would be a stalemate keeping the original law in effect. It was never a possibility to have no patriot act.

Politically, Feingold will obviously use this to deferentiate himself - but how big are the differences between the bill he voted for and this one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whometense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-02-06 03:26 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. Not to sound too elitist,
but the whole issue may be way too complex for some of those yahoos. Even Feingold, their golden boy, is in favor of some form of the Patriot Act.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-02-06 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. What is maddening is that, when it mattered, nobody cared
The threads on the PA and the need to act were sinking.

In addition, the person who started the thread is PO at Kerry because of the call to support Tammy instead of the candidate he/she prefers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-02-06 03:35 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. Or because her hobby is anti-Kerry snark
whenever and whereever possible. She also appears to be for no one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-02-06 03:48 PM
Response to Reply #6
16. Durbin changed his vote to YES.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whometense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-02-06 04:12 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. Interesting.
And inscrutable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenndar Donating Member (911 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-02-06 03:17 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. Yeah, my heart really goes out to the Democratic Senators today.
They were pretty much robbed of the opportunity to make this a fair bill, and if they vote against it, it looks to some like they don't care about national security.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 03:18 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » DU Groups » Democrats » John Kerry Group Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC