|
It's behind the wall they have though.
He calls it an important and moving speech on the anniversary of the 1971 speech. After mentioning the Democrats have been muddled on Iraq, he says that Kerry has found the voice he has been looking for possibly since 1971.
The Kerry speech quotes he uses are:
(at the beginning, before the op-ed,) "Presidents and politicians may worry about losing face, or votes, or legacy; it is time to think about young Americans and innocent civilians who are losing their lives. "
"I believed then, just as I believe now, that the best way to support the troops is to oppose a course that squanders their lives, dishonors their sacrifice, and disserves our people and our principles."
"I have come here today ...... to affirm that it is both a right and an obligation for Americans today to disagree with a President who is wrong, a policy that is wrong, and a war in Iraq that weakens the nation."
"By then, it was clear to me that hundreds of thousands of soldiers, sailors, Marines and airmen—disproportionately poor and minority Americans—were being sent into the valley of the shadow of death for an illusion privately abandoned by the very men in Washington who kept sending them there."
"And the most dangerous defeatists, the most dispiriting pessimists, are those who invoke September 11th to argue that our traditional values are a luxury we can no longer afford.
Kerry's description of the war as, "rooted in deceit and justified by continuing deception.", the need to get past "blindness and deception"
I may have missed others, Herbert lets Kerry speak for Kerry. He then speaks of talking to Kerry by phone. This is from the column:
"In an interview after the speech, I asked Mr. Kerry about the secret prisons being run by the C.I.A. and the practice of extraordinary rendition, in which terror suspects are abducted by the U.S. and sent off to regimes skilled in the art of torture.
He said he believed these policies were violations of the Geneva Conventions, then added: "But the more important thing is that they are violations of our values, violations of our principles. Who are we to run around the world saying protect the Falun Gong or somebody else's right to speak out, and then we're willing to take people without knowledge of innocence and throw them into torture situations. I think that's reprehensible."
|