Richard D
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-30-08 02:43 PM
Original message |
|
I realize that I need a tripod. What I'd like is one that is very travel friendly - e.g. light and small. and sturdy. Not too expensive would help a lot.
|
Deja Q
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-30-08 03:16 PM
Response to Original message |
1. For indoor or outdoor use? |
|
For outdoor use, don't bother with "light" - any whisper of a wind will rock the thing and render blurry, useless photos.
Indoor use - not a problem.
|
Richard D
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-30-08 03:19 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
|
But I'll be carrying it for long distances in rough territory.
|
Deja Q
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-30-08 04:20 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
3. Hmm... have you considered a backpack? |
|
Even if your camera has optical image stabilization, you're still going to want a sturdy and solid a tripod as possible. No plastic $40 junk. :(
|
Richard D
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-30-08 09:54 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
5. I do carry a backpack . . . |
|
. . . but still want to keep weight of the tripod under 4 pounds if possible. No cheap junk wanted.
|
comrade snarky
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-30-08 10:31 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
6. Depending on what you are doing |
|
How about a monopod?
My heavy tripod has one built in that I can pull and carry almost everywhere. It's not perfect but it helps to steady a shot I couldn't get otherwise.
|
Richard D
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-01-08 12:48 AM
Response to Reply #6 |
7. it's more of a tripod use. |
|
Longer exposures than a monopod would work for. But it's a good thought as a backup.
|
Cassandra
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-30-08 07:28 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
4. I have a Slik Sprint Pro, which I took out in the wind... |
|
yesterday. There was some movement but it was more from my p&s camera than the tripod, which seemed pretty solid. It's easy to carry and was under $100.
|
ConsAreLiars
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-01-08 01:40 AM
Response to Original message |
8. Carbon Fiber construction saves weight, maintains rigidity, but also adds $$. |
|
Edited on Mon Dec-01-08 01:41 AM by ConsAreLiars
One tip for increasing stability is that if the tripod and location allow you to easily dangle several pounds of rocks or dirt between the legs, almost anything will have enough mass to become relatively stable. And use a cable release to avoid giving the setup a poke just before the shutter opens.
(edit tiny stuff)
|
ElsewheresDaughter
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-01-08 10:29 AM
Response to Original message |
WannaJumpMyScooter
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-01-08 03:51 PM
Response to Original message |
10. I was in the same boat, so to speak |
|
bought a carbon fiber one... $$$, but sturdy even with my big lens and outdoors.
You will not regret it, or beat it on weight
spread out over the years you will use it, the cost does not hurt as much.
|
Richard D
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-02-08 04:21 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
|
a moderate priced aluminum/magnesuium travel tripod from Induro, the AB1. Weighs 3.4 pounds, has a ball head, and comes with a nice and sturdy travel pack. Used it last night for the first time and I really like it.
|
WannaJumpMyScooter
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-02-08 05:41 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
12. moon, venus and saturn picture? |
|
I would say it works great!
|
Richard D
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-02-08 07:13 PM
Response to Reply #12 |
|
Whole new avenue of picture taking for me just opened up! Thank you!
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Wed May 01st 2024, 01:21 PM
Response to Original message |