lonestarnot
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Apr-24-06 09:57 AM
Original message |
Judge says websurfer can't be fired. Tee hee. |
NoPasaran
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Apr-24-06 10:15 AM
Response to Original message |
1. Freedom to surf! Cawabunga! |
lonestarnot
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Apr-24-06 01:31 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
ComerPerro
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Apr-24-06 10:18 AM
Response to Original message |
2. As long as the work is getting done, then who cares if they surf the net |
|
The only danger I can imagine of having employees be allowed to surf the net, besides potential loss of productivity, is security risks. Employees might be passing on corporate information, or might be doing something illegal. But people who would do that don't need internet to do those things. It can be accomplished just as easily with a phone.
|
rfranklin
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Apr-24-06 10:26 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
3. I read that employees were using passwords on porn sites... |
|
that enabled hackers to access the corporate computers.
I think that would constitute a threat to security.
|
bryant69
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Apr-24-06 10:32 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
4. Even without that, looking at porn at a work site is a potential problem |
|
It can create a hostile atmosphere. Bryant Check it out --> http://politicalcomment.blogspot.com
|
ComerPerro
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Apr-24-06 10:33 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
5. Well, many employers restrict access to porn sites |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri May 03rd 2024, 01:58 PM
Response to Original message |