Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

O'Reilly: Mass. and Vt. will be among few states left where child abusers

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-24-06 04:11 PM
Original message
O'Reilly: Mass. and Vt. will be among few states left where child abusers
O'Reilly: Mass. and Vt. will be among few states left where child abusers "can go and molest children and get sympathy"

http://mediamatters.org/items/200604240008

While discussing several states' recent passage of mandatory minimum sentencing laws for people convicted of sex crimes against children, Fox News host Bill O'Reilly declared: "Soon, there will only be a few states where" sex offenders "can go and molest children and get sympathy, states like Massachusetts and Vermont." O'Reilly made these comments during the April 21 broadcast of Fox News' The O'Reilly Factor.

As The Burlington Free Press reported on April 13, the Vermont Senate "unanimously gave preliminary approval Wednesday to a bill designed to crack down on sex offenses" by "increasing the number of investigators who focus on sex crimes, increasing the number of pre-sentence investigations that judges use to help determine a sentence, trying to better coordinate prevention programs ... decriminalizing consensual sex between teenagers"; creating a "a mandatory minimum sentence of 10 years for aggravated sexual assault"; "expand the sex offender registry to list more offenders on the Internet and add a registry for violent offenders."

The Vermont House of Representatives previously had passed legislation that "approved a mandatory life maximum and set advisory minimum sentences, but declined to affix a mandatory minimum out of concerns they would make it more difficult to prosecute sex crimes." As the Free Press noted on April 5, "any prosecutors and victims' advocates" oppose mandatory sentencing laws "out of concern that the mandate would force more defendants to take their cases to trial, forcing more victims to testify and creating the possibility of more acquittals because sex crimes can be difficult to prove." Vermont's House and Senate are currently resolving the differences between the bills.

While several legislators in Massachusetts, including state Rep. Cheryl A. Coakley-Rivera (D), have proposed or supported bills requiring mandatory sentences for sex offenses committed against children under 14, that state has not passed such legislation.

From the April 21 broadcast of Fox News' The O'Reilly Factor:

O'REILLY: And now the people may put the issue on the ballot, going around the pinhead politicians. That's what the folks in the great state of California did, and Jessica's Law is expected to pass there in a referendum next November. What is happening all across America is a tremendous victory for the folks and for democracy. Even the liberal Oregonian newspaper heard the people and supported Jessica's Law. We applaud the paper for doing so. So, things are looking up for the good guys and are looking black for the bad guys, especially the predators. Soon, there will only be a few states where they can go and molest children and get sympathy, states like Massachusetts and Vermont.

Contact:
Bill O'Reilly oreilly@foxnews.com
Contact:
Fox News Channel FOX News Channel
1-888-369-4762
Comments@foxnews.com
1211 Avenue of the Americas
New York, NY 10036
Contact:
The O'Reilly Factor The O'Reilly Factor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-24-06 04:17 PM
Response to Original message
1. I hate that fucking pissant liar
far more than he hates my state. Vermont child sex abuse rates are significantly lower than the national average- and part of that is that we're smart enough to focus on prevention as well as punishment. What an asshat.

http://www.vnews.com/sexcrimes/index.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-25-06 09:41 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Asshat is far too kind. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-25-06 09:53 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. well I did
call him a fucking pissant liar, too. I'm sure with a little time we could both come up with more colorful descripitions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-25-06 10:20 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. LOL yes you did. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 10:31 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC