Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NAFTA: A Disaster For Mexicans As Well As Americans

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Elwood P Dowd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-04-06 01:35 PM
Original message
NAFTA: A Disaster For Mexicans As Well As Americans
I've posted articles like this many times, but we need to keep the pressure on and spread the word. Actually, Bernie is a little low in his job loss estimates. The real number is in the millions when you add lost service and spin-off jobs. Then you have the falling wages and increased social costs created by what is nothing more than an investment scam for the rich masquerading as "Free Trade".

From Rep Bernie Sanders......

http://bernie.house.gov/documents/opeds/20040127181128.asp

Published on 1/27/2004 in the THE NATION
NAFTA: A DISASTER FOR MEXICANS AS WELL AS AMERICANS
by Rep. Bernie Sanders

Last month, along with six other members of the U.S. Congress, I visited Mexico on a Teamster sponsored trip in order to assess what NAFTA has done to Mexico. What we saw and heard was not pretty. We encountered horrendous poverty, environmental degradation and a lawless and corrupt environment. We talked with mothers who couldn't afford to send their kids to school, workers who were fired for the crime of trying to organize a union and religious workers who were trying to protect young women from the mass murders and rapes which were taking place in Ciudad Juarez, right across the border from El Paso. We also met people who displayed enormous courage and tenacity.

It's pretty well accepted that in the ten years since its enactment, NAFTA has been a disaster for workers in the United States. A small pre-NAFTA trade deficit with Mexico and Canada has exploded to an $85 billion trade deficit. NAFTA has cost us almost 900,000 jobs, many of them in the manufacturing sector that paid decent wages. With cheap labor available around the corner, NAFTA has enabled companies to suppress wages, contributing to the (much ignored) reality that millions of Americans are now working longer hours for lower wages than they used to.

But at least, say NAFTA apologists, the trade agreement has been a boon to the Mexican economy and has improved the lives of our poor neighbors to the south. If only it were true. Since NAFTA, poverty has increased in Mexico, real wages have declined and the minimum wage there has lost almost 50% of its purchasing power. Perhaps most significantly, Mexico's agricultural sector has lost 1.3 million jobs over the last ten years. Mexican farmers, unable to compete with subsidized, cheap corn from American agri-business corporations, have been forced off the land and into Mexico's larger cities or across the border as an illegal immigrant. As stark as these statistic are, they cannot begin to convey what our delegation witnessed in Mexico -- the true human price being extracted from the Mexican people by our trade policy.

<more>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Sequoia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-04-06 01:50 PM
Response to Original message
1. Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
genieroze Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-04-06 01:53 PM
Response to Original message
2. NAFTA was Clinton's mess. It was during his administration that it
passed. Maybe he believed this would be a good thing for both countries. I guess he didn't figure in the greed and corruption of these companies. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enfield collector Donating Member (821 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-04-06 02:37 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. I though pappy bush negotiated and Clinton just rubber stamped it?
either way it will pail in comparison to the damage that CAFTA will do if shrub ever gets it passed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zhade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-04-06 03:03 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. What really pisses liberals and progressives off...
...those who remember, anyway, is that Clinton campaigned on ensuring worker protections in NAFTA, then ditched them once in office.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zhade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-04-06 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. What really pisses liberals and progressives off...
Edited on Thu May-04-06 03:04 PM by Zhade
...those of us who remember, anyway, is that Clinton campaigned on ensuring worker protections in NAFTA, then ditched them once in office.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Elwood P Dowd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-04-06 04:33 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. You mean FTAA
CAFTA has already passed.

Yes, it was old man Bush who negotiated and signed NAFTA. Clinton then rammed the implementing legislation through Congress in 1993. Clinton, Gore, Mitchell, Matsui, Richardson, Foley, Rostenkowsky, and other key dems took the money and gave us the shaft.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
genieroze Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-05-06 12:51 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. Now we have SHAFTA, so bend over people and take it like good
little sheeple. Sheesh!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Elwood P Dowd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-05-06 01:14 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. And some DUers want Gore or Richardson for prez.
I guess 5 years of Bushit makes anyone look attractive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
genieroze Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-05-06 01:33 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. You forgot Senator Clinton. Then again Satan would be better then *.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Elwood P Dowd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-05-06 01:45 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. Too bad Marcy Kaptor and Byron Dorgan are not electable
The money boys would never allow such a ticket, but those two would be infinitely better than what we will eventually be forced to accept.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
genieroze Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-05-06 12:48 AM
Response to Reply #3
9. If that's true then Clinton should have told Poppy Bush where he could
Edited on Fri May-05-06 12:59 AM by genieroze
shove his rubber stamp! NAFTA, CAFTA, what's next the Shafta? :wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-04-06 03:45 PM
Response to Original message
6. Mexico is Junior's dream of an "ownership society."
Edited on Thu May-04-06 03:47 PM by TahitiNut
How many times do we have to hear theat the "economy improved" when the top 10% collect 90% of the value of the wealth created by the labor of the bottom 90%? The Family Income Gini Ratio in Mexico is over 0.54 (0.546 in 2004) and getting higher.


Wealth inequality in the United States has a Gini coefficient of 0.82, which is pretty close to the maximum level of inequality (1.00) you can have. (To imagine this, this would be the Gini Ratio if 18% of the people share 100% of the wealth equally, and the remaining 82% have absolutely nothing.)


2004 Gini coefficients in selected countries
(from the United Nations Human Development Report 2004)

Hungary: 0.244
Denmark: 0.247
Japan: 0.249
Sweden: 0.250
Germany: 0.283
India: 0.325
France: 0.327
Canada: 0.331
Australia: 0.352
UK: 0.360
Italy: 0.360
USA: 0.408
China: 0.447
Russia: 0.456
Guatemala: 0.483
Hong Kong: 0.500
Mexico: 0.546
Chile: 0.571
Namibia: 0.707
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-04-06 03:50 PM
Response to Original message
7. Exactly, and because of the devastation of Mexico's economy...
Edited on Thu May-04-06 03:50 PM by Solon
desparate people then move on to slightly greener pastures, the United States. Is it any wonder that Immigration from Mexico both legal and illegal, has increased by almost 10% in 10 years?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 07:33 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC