Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Molly Ivins: The Best Little Whorehouse in Washington

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
norml Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-10-06 01:13 AM
Original message
Molly Ivins: The Best Little Whorehouse in Washington
Molly Ivins: The Best Little Whorehouse in Washington

Posted on May 8, 2006
By Molly Ivins

AUSTIN, Texas—Of course I am above sex, drugs and rock ’n’ roll. So serious a servant of the public interest am I, I can fogey with the best: On my better days, I make David Broder look like Page Six.

snip

On other hand, if you expect me to pass up a scandal involving poker, hookers and the Watergate building with crooked defense contractors and the No. 3 guy at the CIA, named Dusty Foggo (Dusty Foggo?! Be still my heart), you expect too much. Any journalist who claims Hookergate is not a legitimate scandal is dead—has been for some time and needs to be unplugged. In addition to sex, drugs and rock ’n’ roll, Hookergate is rife with public-interest questions, misfeasance, malfeasance and non-feasance, and many splendid moral points for the children. Recommended for Sunday school use, grades seven and above.

But for starters, let us consider the unenviable record of Porter Goss at the CIA. From the beginning of his tenure, Goss has been criticized for politicizing the agency. He brought a bunch of political hacks with him for staff, one of whom turns out to be the poker player called “Nine Fingers.” And in the end, he was probably fired for not having politicized the agency sufficiently.

What is the point of politicizing an intelligence agency? So the CIA officials would get a report from some agent in Iraq saying, “Looks bad.” The first thing they’d ask was, “Is this agent a Republican or a Democrat?”

Maybe there really are conservatives who believe everything in Iraq is hunky-dory and there’s a giant media conspiracy to hide the joyous tidings. But as you may recall, the ever-nimble minds at Donny Rumsfeld’s shop have already tried paying public relations people to invent good news about Iraq and then plant it in newspapers there—it didn’t work. In fact, it was so stupid it was humiliating. Fortunately, the Pentagon was once again able to investigate itself and determine it had done nothing illegal.


snip


http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/20060508_molly_ivins_whorehouse/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Ringo84 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-10-06 01:17 AM
Response to Original message
1. Re:
YES! Molly Ivins! She is awesome!

I get (or my household gets) the Richmond, VA paper The Times-Dispatch. Molly Ivins in featured once a week on the commentary page, which is pretty conservative (Ross Mackenzie, the editor, is fairly right-wing but I don't think he's a nut in most cases).

Lots of Republicans have written to the paper to advocate Molly getting dropped from the Op-Ed line-up because she "doesn't contribute anything ". These people are just angry because a liberal who isn't afraid to express herself is featured in the paper. Get over it!
Ringo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhiteTara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-10-06 01:30 AM
Response to Original message
2. Go Molly
This woman has ovarios! Great article. :applause:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChairmanAgnostic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-10-06 07:11 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. Huge ones, too!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CrazyOrangeCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-10-06 05:23 AM
Response to Original message
3. Rock on, Molly!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-10-06 06:27 AM
Response to Original message
4. I love Molly n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
norml Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-10-06 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. I saw that this was only posted in the Editorials forum, and that it had
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-10-06 08:00 AM
Response to Original message
6. LOL!
"Fortunately, the Pentagon was once again able to investigate itself and determine it had done nothing illegal."

How this Administration has continually managed to stop every worthy investigation could be the topic of a week's worth of Daily Shows.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
young_at_heart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-10-06 10:18 AM
Response to Original message
7. GREAT line: "The Pentagon was once again able to investigate itself"
One wonders if they have ever found themselves to have something illegal?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurovski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-10-06 10:33 AM
Response to Original message
8. K&R.(no text)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BoneDaddy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-10-06 10:35 AM
Response to Original message
9. Good Golly Miss Molly
you always make me laugh with your wit and intelligience.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-10-06 02:05 PM
Response to Original message
11. God I love that woman. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 07:22 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC