rodeodance
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-11-06 10:00 AM
Original message |
House Dems put 2 motions to adjourn today. cspan. Upsetting the Repugs. |
|
Edited on Thu May-11-06 10:24 AM by rodeodance
edited subject line.
Dem called for it but it got voted down. last few minutes lots of gaveling. just wondering.
|
rodeodance
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-11-06 10:06 AM
Response to Original message |
1. I gather the Dems were upset over Repug restrictive rules being put in |
|
place for upcoming bill on budget.
|
rodeodance
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-11-06 10:07 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
2. Now another Dem said to adjourn. |
rodeodance
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-11-06 10:07 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
3. so now another recorded vote (to adjorn) |
rodeodance
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-11-06 10:08 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
4. she said because of the UNFAIRNESS of the debates she moved to |
rodeodance
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-11-06 10:08 AM
Response to Reply #4 |
6. csapn saying this in the Secondd PROTEST vote (from Dems) |
kentuck
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-11-06 10:08 AM
Response to Original message |
5. I think they want to get out of town... |
|
since it is Thursday already and they need to get back to their districts and campaign for re-election but Democrats seem to be holding up their departures??
|
rodeodance
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-11-06 10:09 AM
Response to Reply #5 |
7. seems Dems are very upset and are getting back at Repugs. |
rodeodance
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-11-06 10:10 AM
Response to Reply #5 |
8. te he. maybe you are right. |
rodeodance
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-11-06 10:10 AM
Response to Reply #8 |
rodeodance
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-11-06 10:11 AM
Response to Reply #9 |
10. it seems that the Dems are getting more votes this time. |
rodeodance
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-11-06 10:12 AM
Response to Reply #10 |
11. Louise Slaughter moved to vote for this adjournment (D. NY). |
rodeodance
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-11-06 10:12 AM
Response to Reply #11 |
12. She sure is ruffling the Repug feathers today. |
rodeodance
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-11-06 10:13 AM
Response to Reply #12 |
13. I think the first was ordered by a Dem from Oregon but not sure. |
BurtWorm
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-11-06 10:20 AM
Response to Reply #5 |
22. Is this the bill that prohibits the inspector from studying reconstruction |
rodeodance
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-11-06 10:21 AM
Response to Reply #22 |
25. it is the defense program --so many things in it. |
Jeffersons Ghost
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-11-06 10:46 AM
Response to Reply #25 |
34. good I'm glad top Dems are trying to assault the REAL monster |
|
Defense is the name of a hidden Demon the puppet tyrant party truly serves.
|
rodeodance
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-11-06 10:14 AM
Response to Original message |
rodeodance
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-11-06 10:14 AM
Response to Reply #14 |
15. Dems voting to adjoun so far are adding up slowly. It will not pass but |
|
Edited on Thu May-11-06 10:27 AM by rodeodance
it will voice their concern.
|
rodeodance
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-11-06 10:15 AM
Response to Reply #15 |
16. Dems want the Rule to allow for more debate. |
rodeodance
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-11-06 10:15 AM
Response to Reply #16 |
rodeodance
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-11-06 10:16 AM
Response to Reply #17 |
18. Dems are protesting that the rule is not changed. |
rodeodance
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-11-06 10:16 AM
Response to Reply #18 |
19. saying this could continue all day. if Dems continure to move to adjourn |
Sydnie
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-11-06 10:19 AM
Response to Reply #19 |
|
If you can't shut them down then tie their hands with this motion all day.
|
rodeodance
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-11-06 10:20 AM
Response to Reply #20 |
21. cspan said some 'business' had to take place-then Dems could do |
|
call for motion to adjourn again if they want.
|
rodeodance
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-11-06 10:20 AM
Response to Reply #21 |
23. 101 Dems want to adjourn so far. |
Norquist Nemesis
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-11-06 10:23 AM
Response to Reply #23 |
28. Confused... 64 yea; 111 nay at the moment |
|
Just tuned in...Isn't that 64 that want to adjourn?
|
rodeodance
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-11-06 10:26 AM
Response to Reply #28 |
30. oh drats. sorry, but I got my columns confused. Sorry |
Norquist Nemesis
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-11-06 10:26 AM
Response to Reply #30 |
31. Still...there are now 2 Cons voting yea |
|
Making progress! *high five*
|
0007
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-11-06 10:21 AM
Response to Reply #20 |
rodeodance
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-11-06 10:22 AM
Response to Reply #24 |
rodeodance
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-11-06 10:22 AM
Response to Reply #26 |
27. 66 Dems want to adjourn now. |
|
Edited on Thu May-11-06 10:26 AM by rodeodance
edited subject line.
|
rodeodance
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-11-06 10:25 AM
Response to Reply #27 |
29. one Republican voting YEA |
rodeodance
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-11-06 10:29 AM
Response to Original message |
32. The House will be in order. |
Norquist Nemesis
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-11-06 10:31 AM
Response to Reply #32 |
|
I have to run out for a bit and I'm going to miss the fireworks. :( Trying to hold off walking out the door till Louise is done speaking...
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri May 03rd 2024, 09:04 AM
Response to Original message |