xultar
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-11-06 05:59 PM
Original message |
They are looking for the leakers people! I just realised that. |
|
Edited on Thu May-11-06 06:00 PM by xultar
They are looking for the people in their administration who are leaking negative shit to the press. They are looking for whistleblowers. FUCKERS.
Sorry I'm late to the party on this.
|
helderheid
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-11-06 06:00 PM
Response to Original message |
1. WOW. I think you got it. |
ayeshahaqqiqa
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-11-06 06:01 PM
Response to Original message |
2. Well, if they learned anything from Watergate |
|
the leakers know how to contact people without using phones and emails.
|
xultar
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-11-06 06:02 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
3. I don't think they have. That is why we are going through this again. |
this_side_up
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-11-06 06:02 PM
Response to Original message |
4. Yes! Leakers would be their #1 priority. After that... |
|
pot dealers and growers because only the Do As I Say, Not As I Do Republicans are allowed to handle pot.
|
DrDebug
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-11-06 06:02 PM
Response to Original message |
5. Complete obedience to the leader |
|
As an option, you can also write the name of each child under one of the fishes.http://www.kidssundayschool.com/Preschool/Bboards/1bboard05.php
|
henslee
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-11-06 06:04 PM
Response to Original message |
6. You are right. When do these guys get impeached. |
spanone
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-11-06 06:05 PM
Response to Original message |
7. Pat Roberts said this was the REAL problem, not the surveillance. |
|
This is fucking criminal.
|
still_one
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-11-06 06:06 PM
Response to Original message |
8. also their political opponents |
|
you can almost bet that Kerry's conversations were listened to
|
bluemarkers
(209 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-11-06 06:15 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
|
A friend was working for a nsa cooperative phone company. There was concern in his group about phone taps - from what he said it was kinda joking - but a concern - we are talking low to mid level techs. They got a message repeating verbatim the conversation within hours of their private meeting - less than 10 people. While he thinks wire tapping was present at both conventions, this happened to be the Dems convention. Creepy. Could have been one of the ten, but who knows.
|
Quakerfriend
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-11-06 06:15 PM
Response to Original message |
10. Would this include cell phones? |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri May 03rd 2024, 08:23 AM
Response to Original message |