Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NYT: "Congress must stop pretending", Bush claims "limitless power"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-12-06 09:06 AM
Original message
NYT: "Congress must stop pretending", Bush claims "limitless power"
What we have here is a clandestine surveillance program of enormous size, which is being operated by members of the administration who are subject to no limits or scrutiny beyond what they deem to impose on one another. If the White House had gotten its way, the program would have run secretly until the war on terror ended — that is, forever.

Congress must stop pretending that it has no serious responsibilities for monitoring the situation. The Senate should call back Attorney General Alberto Gonzales and ask him — this time, under oath — about the scope of the program. This time, lawmakers should not roll over when Mr. Gonzales declines to provide answers. The confirmation hearings of Michael Hayden, President Bush's nominee for Central Intelligence Agency director, are also a natural forum for a serious, thorough and pointed review of exactly what has been going on.

Most of all, Congress should pass legislation that removes any doubt that this kind of warrantless spying on ordinary Americans is illegal. If the administration finds the current procedures for getting court approval of wiretaps too restrictive, this would be the time to make any needed adjustments.

President Bush began his defense of the N.S.A. program yesterday by invoking, as he often does, Sept. 11. The attacks that day firmed the nation's resolve to protect itself against its enemies, but they did not give the president the limitless power he now claims to intrude on the private communications of the American people.

New York Times
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
skooooo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-12-06 09:11 AM
Response to Original message
1. ...
:wow:


:popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
savemefromdumbya Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-12-06 09:13 AM
Response to Original message
2. Megalomaniac who wants to rule the world with unlimited powers!
God talked to him!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gWbush is Mabus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-12-06 09:16 AM
Response to Original message
3. they are tapping EVERY NYTimes reporter and their contacts with leakers
guaranteed
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
symbolman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-12-06 09:16 AM
Response to Original message
4. Gee
All of a sudden the media is sorta noticing that there's something wrong, like there's a fly in their soup..

goddam them, they are just as responsible for this Bastard's Fascist theft of our nation as HE IS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-12-06 09:31 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. You said it for me. Thanks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
symbolman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-12-06 09:35 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. My Pleasure
I'd seriously love to see some of these talking heads sitting in cells in the Hague on suicide watch along with the whole REGIME, they've killed our troops for RATINGS.

Totally Culpable in my book.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-12-06 10:05 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. Actually, NYT editorials have been stinging indictements for months
-and not only on domestic spying, but on taxes, judicial picks, lobbyists and corruption, crony appointments, Darfur, and environmental issues.

I agree that, in general, media shares a mammoth portion of responsibility for what's gone on but this page has been breaking that pattern.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
doodadem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-12-06 10:15 AM
Response to Original message
8. So if Bush claims limitless power
and total disregard for the Constitution, when is he going to decide to make himself President for life? Who's going to stop him?

I've seen several interviews lately with Jonathan Turley, Constitutional scholar extraordinaire. He's saying Bush is out of control, totally illegal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 09:14 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC