Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Verizon Wireless did NOT turn over numbers to nsa?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
orleans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-12-06 02:03 PM
Original message
Verizon Wireless did NOT turn over numbers to nsa?
i just called to find out when my contract was up--and the woman i spoke to said that verizon WIRELESS did not turn over info.

i doubted that, but i googled and found this :

"Verizon Wireless spokesman Jeffrey Nelson definitively said his company — a joint venture between Verizon and Britain's Vodafone (VOD) — was "not involved in this situation." His counterparts at Cingular — an AT&T/BellSouth joint venture — and Sprint Nextel Corp. (S) were less explicit and did not deny any participation."

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,195205,00.html

i told her that verizon wireless should contact the press and have them correct this because it was my impression from the usa article that it included verizon wireless.

anyone else know anything on this, one way or the other?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
northzax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-12-06 02:04 PM
Response to Original message
1. don't need to
wireless calling histories are, in essence, publically avaliable already. For $50, I can get a list of everyone you talked to last year...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-12-06 03:25 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Where does the list come from?
Has the NSA set up "secret rooms" at Verizon to intercept all communications, as they have at ATT?

How the NSA is able to collect the information is important--whether it is logged and analyzed automatically, or whether they actually have to hunt it down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northzax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-12-06 03:33 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. as a general rule of thumb
assume that anything that is transmitted over airwaves is picked up by the NSA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-12-06 03:37 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Do you have a source for that? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northzax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-12-06 04:19 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. yeah, it's what the NSA does
electronic surveillance. they basically suck everything out of the air. it's what they do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sutz12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-12-06 02:05 PM
Response to Original message
2. Fox news = spin
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-12-06 02:06 PM
Response to Original message
3. Yeah, but if you had a Verizon landline, bend over!
And as another poster noted, cell records are easy to get.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-12-06 02:06 PM
Response to Original message
4. i have Verizon, they should do a major press release NOW
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orleans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-12-06 05:14 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. that's what i told the girl i talked to
because i was under the impression that verizon wireless was doing this shit too. if they're not--they need the press to clairfy it. because i am on the verge of switching companies--but if the wireless isn't doing it then i guess i'll stay with verizon for my cell phones.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sgent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-12-06 05:18 PM
Response to Original message
10. It shouldn't matter
just because a subsidiary didn't commit the sins of the company this time -- you are still supporting the profits and activities of the owner.

Its equivalent to saying that even though your pharmacist refuses to fill birth control -- you'll continue to use him for all your needs except birth control.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orleans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-12-06 09:17 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. actually--that's what i said to the woman i spoke to...
(not the part about birth control & pharmacies--but the part about still being a part of a company who is doing this.... she kept saying the wireless part isn't doing it.)

whatever....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 04:27 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC