where is the damn pentagon video?

[mikelgb]

judicalwatch.org has been down (or too busy) since I heard about the story and this is killing me

anybody seen it yet?

have alternate links?

[Warpy]

1. There's a tinfoil hat group on DU.

Check them out. That's where that stuff belongs.

[mikelgb]

um video released from pentagon is tin-foil-hat?

[New Government]

12. Uh...this is a major news item of the day.

Does the "official conspiracy theory" (Osama-bots with box cutters) belong in the tin foil forum too?

[unda cova brutha]

2. theyre finishing up with the last minute "editing" of it

to match their story that it really was a plane that hit the pentagone.

[MrModerate]

5. Puh-leeze . . .

Don't we have a conspiracy theory forum around here somewhere? No? Then "they" must have deleted it!

[tridim]

3. It's all over Faux.

It's the same video that we've all seen, they just let us see more of the billowing smoke after the whatever-it-is hit the Pentagon. The video shows no 757.

[i miss america]

4. I saw the video on CNN, but still, NO PLANE!

Just a few new frames from the five slides previously released.

[MADem]

6. That wasn't the video, that was file footage

You're referring to the Barbara Starr standup from the Pentagon, I assume.

[i miss america]

7. Nope. I am referring to what CNN identified as the newly released footage

Screen shots posted here:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=364x1205964

:wtf:

[MADem]

10. This??

mms://wm.world.mii-streaming.net/media/defense/flight77/fl77-1_11094135.WMV at http://www.defenselink.mil/pubs/foi/index.html#911video

My old eyes see the a/c more clearly in the second view.

[Sterling]

13. No that was it, seriously.

Pretty funny huh. That is what they are putting out there to lay this to rest. I thought it was the old one as well. Which in a way it is, there is are just a couple of extra frames they released. They discussed this in the CNN report.

[quickesst]

8. I'm just wondering....

what so many of you are afraid of. Come on in to the 9/11 forum and see for yourself. For every gubment angle on this story there are scenarios that are so much more believable than the "official" account it's laughable. Someone on here, a year or so ago stated, "being a conspiracy theorist on 9/11 simply means that I know more than you do. That's the way I see it. No one can state positively an opinion they either know nothing about, heard something about, or simply take it upon theirselves to proclaim is true simply because they believe it, or the possibility of govenment complicity is just too much for their minds to handle. This regime has effectively murdered almost three thousand Americans by sending them to fight a war for their own greed and lust for power. Do you really think that 3000 American civilians would bother their conscience if it turned out to be a useful mechanism to further their goal? Hide if you must, but trying, without much finesse, to insult those who do not conform to another person's blind acceptance of the gubment story is very telling. Thanks.
quickesst

[Jigarotta]

9. well said, and thank you.

Diebold and election fraud was 'tinfoily' too a few years ago.

you'd think people would learn that anything is possible with the PNACers after all the awful examples we've seen from them over the years.

[unda cova brutha]

11. because there never was any plane