Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Cocaine In Breast Milk Caused Death

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
ECH1969 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-24-06 12:25 PM
Original message
Cocaine In Breast Milk Caused Death
A Michigan woman is charged with involuntary manslaughter after prosecutors say her 5-month-old daughter died from drinking breast milk containing cocaine.

Sara Shelby was arraigned Thursday. If convicted, she faces up to 15 years in prison.

Initially, the cause of the baby's death was thought to be sudden infant death syndrome.

The medical examiner sent samples of the infant's blood to a laboratory for routine analysis, but because no foul play was suspected, the samples weren't tested until recently.

http://www.nbc5i.com/family/9244728/detail.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Beelzebud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-24-06 12:26 PM
Response to Original message
1. She should get life in prison...
Sick assholes like this don't deserve freedom.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SteppingRazor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-24-06 12:30 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Eh, she probably didn't know any better...
I imagine killing her own baby is probably far worse punishment than whatever he state will dish out
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beelzebud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-24-06 12:32 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Coke whore poisons baby. Sorry. Can't seem to feel sympathy for her.
Want an abortian? Do it BEFORE birth.

Getting all coked out at home with an infant, and then breastfeeding, is nothing that is going to elicit sympathy from me.

If it was a man. And he accidently poisoned his baby with cocaine, I guarantee he'd be in jail for life.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmejack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-24-06 12:43 PM
Response to Reply #4
12. You're slinging around invective without knowing the facts
But don't let that stop you. Or do you have all the particulars in this case at your fingertips? If so please be kind enough to impart the particulars to the rest of us, so we too can pass judgment on this woman. Whore indeed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beelzebud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-24-06 12:43 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. The baby died from cocain poisoning. It's time for jail.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Virginia Dare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-24-06 01:37 PM
Response to Reply #13
24. If she's convicted, that's where she's going apparently...
and she's got to live with the fact that she killed her own child, so unless she's a cold hearted empty shell of a human that's punishment enough. Since she was breast feeding her child, I assume she had some sort of nurturing feeling towards him.

By the way, cocaine is an extremely addictive drug. I've seen people do some horrible things to themselves and others because of cocaine addiction, and I did have sympathy for them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lucy - Claire Donating Member (151 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-25-06 09:59 AM
Response to Reply #12
85. Maybe not a whore.. but criminally stupid....
A breast feeding mother has to take care of everything they put in their bodies...
She deserves prison, I have no sympathy, she was responsible for her baby and she
let it die needlessly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bonobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-24-06 02:05 PM
Response to Reply #4
26. If she was breastfeeding her baby, she must have loved it
dearly and you must be a very sad individual to make the remarks you make.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beelzebud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-24-06 02:22 PM
Response to Reply #26
31. Didn't love her baby enough to not poison it with the cocaine she
continued using though, did she?

I guess I'm just a bad guy. If my wife were using coocaine around a newborn, whe would soon lose custody.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bonobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-24-06 02:43 PM
Response to Reply #31
44. It is a sad day on DU
When people sit at their computers and pretend they can read into people's hearts and judge them.

Have they ever walked in that woman's shoes?

She used coke and she breastfed her baby. Maybe I don't get it, but unless she KNEW it was going to harm the baby, why is she a bad person?

She was breastfeeding her baby. A loving act of nurturing. She wasn't sticking pre-made formula in its mouth though that probably would have been easier...

Anyway, all you judgmental jerks should close your mouths and think about how much child nurturing you have done in your own lives. Probably less than you should have, so stop judging...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beelzebud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-24-06 04:37 PM
Response to Reply #44
61. Baby dies of cocaine overdoes, and I'm not to judge his shit mother?
It really is a sad day for DU...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lastliberalintexas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-24-06 06:05 PM
Response to Reply #61
68. Not until you have all the facts
There are plenty of unanswered questions raised by this article, but don't let pesky little things like facts get in the way of a good hang em high rant.

If you are ever charged with a crime, be sure and tell the prosecutors that they can skip the trial, as you'll agree to go straight to jail I'm sure. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lucy - Claire Donating Member (151 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-25-06 10:09 AM
Response to Reply #44
86. She snortted cocaine knowing she was breatfeeding...
that is not something a caring, nurturing mother would do.A nurturing mother would not delibratly harm her child and if she is a serious addict then bottle feeding would have been the best thing, while getting help so that she does not
subject her child to a drug addict for a mother and end up in care.
It is not a matter of sitting at a computer and judging, she killed her baby by taking coke and feeding it to her baby
through her breast milk.. I pity the baby and the woman who will get clean and feel the full force of her actions. But it is manslaughter and should be treated as such.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bonobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-25-06 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #86
95. Why do you think it was deliberate?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJ_Lib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-24-06 12:30 PM
Response to Original message
3. My God, how much cocaine did she have...


... to be doing in order for it to have killed her baby through her breast milk? I've heard of babies ingesting cocaine directly and surviving, this had to be massive amounts... She should stand trial for manslaughter, at least...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benburch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-24-06 12:33 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Drugs concentrate in breast milk...
...as do pesticides and other nasty things.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cairycat Donating Member (454 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-24-06 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #6
51. No, this depends on the drug
and a number of other factors, such as how well a drug is absorbed orally, how well it binds to protein in the milk, how large a molecule it is, how quickly it reaches maximum concentration in the mother's plasma and how quickly it is out of her blood, etc. etc.

Of course it is a bad idea for a mother doing cocaine to breastfeed her baby. However, a mother using cocaine probably cannot competently care for her child, regardless of how the baby is fed. Cocaine is actually processed by the body fairly rapidly, but is considered to have 91% oral absorption, which is quite high.

As far as chocolate, coffee, and other caffeinated drinks - it depends on the baby. It was never a problem for my three children.

Many, many prescription drugs are quite safe for nursing mothers to take. In the majority of cases, mother's milk with a drug in it is still vastly superior to formula. Women should NOT feel that they shouldn't breastfeed because they won't be able to take needed drugs. They should however, check with a knowledgeable health professional about the safety of the drug in question. Unfortunately, there are way too many doctors and nurses who just say, "you're breastfeeding - you can't take anything". A knowledgeable provider will know enough to check a good reference, like Medications and Mothers' Milk by Thomas W. Hale, a Texas pharmacist who is considered one of the world's leading experts on this subject.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJ_Lib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-24-06 03:18 PM
Response to Reply #51
56. Thank you,
Edited on Wed May-24-06 03:19 PM by NJ_Lib

... I learned a few things I didn't know... ;)


Edited: Spelling
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ilsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-24-06 06:09 PM
Response to Reply #51
69. Bravo! You beat me to saying everything I wanted to say!
Benburch is awesome, :pals: but a few of us have got the facts on him on this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dora Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-25-06 10:33 AM
Response to Reply #6
89. "Concentrates" is a misleading word.
I once did a lot of reading and research on drugs, pregnancy, and breastfeeding. What I learned is that research results can be misunderstood because of terms like "concentrates" and "concentrations."

Some drugs will pass into a mother's breast milk in variable concentrations. Unfortunately, many people read "concentrations" and assume that means it's a stronger dose. That's not what it means. It just means that the drug appears in the milk. Its concentration may be weak, or it may be strong, but the word "concentration" alone does not signify any sort of increased power.

I just wanted to raise the point. I do think that the infant in question had an increased risk of SIDS because of maternal drug use, but I doubt that s/he died because of a cocaine overdose. I imagine that if the mother was using cocaine, she was probably also smoking cigarettes, which is a huge factor in SIDS deaths. Nicotine is a big no-no for breastfeeding mothers.

I haven't heard yet if the ME has issued a statement on blood toxicity levels.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mandate My Ass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-24-06 12:33 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. I don't know
when I was breastfeeding my doc warned me against any caffeinated drinks and even small amounts of chocolate. That was really hard to give up but I did rather than find out how hyper a baby could get from chocolate-laden breast milk. Maybe it was over a period of time that it built up in the baby's system, not just one feeding. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJ_Lib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-24-06 12:41 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. Yes, I remember too, you have to be so careful...


... when you're breastfeeding, even spicy food is discouraged... How ignorant do you have to be, to do cocaine and then breastfeed? What do they say, ignorance is not an excuse? We would be tearing her apart if she drove without a car seat and her baby was killed, I don't see much of a difference here...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mandate My Ass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-24-06 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. People can be pretty ignorant about biology
A long time ago I read a book written by a woman doctor who worked for years in ob/gyn. She said one woman came into the hospital in labor with her sixth or seventh child and wanted a tubal ligation after the baby was born. During the birth there were complications and they had to do an emergency C-section and hysterectomy. The woman refused to leave the hospital without having her tubes tied. Nobody could convince her she could never get pregnant without a uterus. There were many, many more stories like that one but that's the one that stands out to me.

So I can believe someone could be that ignorant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJ_Lib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-24-06 12:54 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. I do see your point but how in the world...


...do you go about proving something like this in a court of law? Proving that you actually didn't know...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mandate My Ass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-24-06 01:19 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. You can't
but the prosecution is the one with the burden of proof. She likely did know it could possibly harm her baby, but addicts always think they can get away with it just this one last time, then they're gonna quit, for real this time, no kidding.

I'd hate to think she gambled with her baby's health this way, but she was likely doing it through the pregnancy and thought she'd gotten through the tough part.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AngryAmish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-24-06 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #11
22. Spicy food is discouraged?
I'm a childless guy so forgive my ignorence -- but I could NOT give up spicy food for the months/years of breastfeeding. The 'lil critter would just learn how to deal with jalapenos.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mandate My Ass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-24-06 01:37 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. Yes, that was tough too
no cayenne, tabasco, jalapenoes, chipotle or anything along those lines, even Old Bay was discouraged. In other words, get used to bland!

I don't think I could manage that now but it doesn't matter since my son is in his twenties. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-25-06 11:41 AM
Response to Reply #23
94. obviously no one informed the cajuns about this
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-24-06 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #22
59. No, it's not. Some kids might react to what you eat. Mine never did.
I didn't have to alter my diet at all. Both of my children were exclusively breastfed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ilsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-24-06 06:14 PM
Response to Reply #22
71. It depends on how the baby reacts. My kids loved it when I ate
spicy foods, and they tooted pretty freely if I had something that made them gassy. Some babies can handle savory foods; other babies can't until they are older nursing babies or not at all. The mother can eat almost anything she wants. She just needs to watch the baby for signs of a reaction to the food.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
etherealtruth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-24-06 08:05 PM
Response to Reply #22
77. Well ...
I'm not sure I buy that either. Think of all the cultures where extremely spicy food is the norm, women continue to eat their cultural diets and breast feed w/out problem. I married into an Indian family (from the subcontinent), their style of cooking was very spicy (ah, the food, the food that is what I miss from my marriage) I nursed all three of my children ... but, I did not use drugs (*) or alcohol. * I did drink a COUPLE of cups of caffeinated coffee every day, it seems the human body quickly adjusts to the caffeine in coffee and none of my children suffered ill effects from it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lucy - Claire Donating Member (151 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-25-06 10:18 AM
Response to Reply #22
87. Not just for breastfeeding but during pregnancy
Spicy foods are not wise during pregnancy either it can cause heartburn and discomfort for both mother and baby....
If you eat spicy food while pregnant it will become apparent that it is a problem and it will if you breast feed after eat jalapenos and the baby is crying all night with belly ache and has bad diapers too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jed Dilligan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-24-06 02:11 PM
Response to Reply #11
29. Fix the education system before sending people up the river
for being uneducated. Please?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-24-06 02:31 PM
Response to Reply #29
36. The education system is responsible?
Pray do tell how in the world they are the reason this baby died.

:popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jed Dilligan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-24-06 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #36
39. Well, if we could assume the woman knew any biology
as we could in almost any other developed country, we could also assume she knew she was killing her baby. But we can't assume that, because she grew up in America, and so she is probably pretty ignorant.

But I don't blame the education system--I blame the War on Drugs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-24-06 03:21 PM
Response to Reply #39
57. Well we don't have all the facts yet
Edited on Wed May-24-06 03:21 PM by proud2Blib
But I think we can blame a drug addiction. And the war on drugs can share responsibility :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MountainLaurel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-24-06 07:52 PM
Response to Reply #11
76. Spicy food?
I wonder what women in India and Latin America eat when they're breastfeeding?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lucy - Claire Donating Member (151 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-25-06 10:23 AM
Response to Reply #76
88. milder spices....
Also maybe genetics come into this. If a child is born into a culture were spicy food is normal and everyday,
then it may cause less irritation. In India they would eat Kormas, mangos,coconut and rice, rather than firey food.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ilsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-24-06 06:11 PM
Response to Reply #7
70. You watch the baby for reactions. Some babies react more than
others to one thing or another. My first child was jittery if I drank caffeine, but it didn't even faze my second child. One glass of red wine was the limit as my babies got older (a year or so) and I was still nursing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-24-06 12:32 PM
Response to Original message
5. Fe fi fo fum, I smell BULLSHIT
and a drug phobic, overzealous prosecutor with too much time on his hands.

Babies are BORN with huge loads of cocaine in their systems directly from adddicted mothers' blood supplies and live through it.

There couldn't have been enough in breast milk to kill the kid.

This is such a load of crap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benburch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-24-06 12:35 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. Well, somehow this child got a lethal dose.
If not from breast-feeding, how?

The breast milk part might be prosecutorial zealous conjecture, but he can't make up a lethal dose in the blood.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
High Plains Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-24-06 01:19 PM
Response to Reply #9
19. No, somehow this baby died.
Prosecutor says cocaine overdose. That doesn't mean it's true. I would be interested to hear just what the level was. I suspect any amount of cocaine in the blood would get the prosecutor going. The initial diagnosis was SIDS.

Reminds of those people getting killed by Tasers, and it's never the Taser that killed them, it was the cocaine in their system or "excited delirium."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benburch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-24-06 01:21 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. Medical examiners don't usually lie about these things.
But I'll leave that to the jury to decide.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
High Plains Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-24-06 01:58 PM
Response to Reply #20
25. The medical examiner didn't say it was a lethal dose of cocaine
At least not in the linked story. Prosecutors said the baby died from lethal levels of cocaine. The story doesn't say how much cocaine was found in the baby's system. In fact, the story doesn't even say cocaine was found at all (a curious lacunae).

And medical examiners have been known to err. I already referenced the various Taser deaths blamed on cocaine. And there is the case of the Florida boot camp kid beaten to death by guards where the medical examiner blamed it on sickle cell anemia.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maine-ah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-24-06 05:31 PM
Response to Reply #25
62. is it possible
that the child really did die from SIDS, and just happened to have some cocaine in her system from the breast milk?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ilsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-24-06 06:16 PM
Response to Reply #9
72. What if someone gave it directly to the baby? Only a small amount
from the mother's use would have been secreted in her breastmilk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJ_Lib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-24-06 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #5
14. Most five month old babies aren't crawling yet...


... How else would the cocaine get there? Unless the mother did through the pregnancy and continued through breastfeeding, until the levels in the baby's blood exceeded what she could tolerate... But I thought they tested most newborn babies for drugs. Why would they release her to her mother if cocaine was found at birth? I bet we don't have the whole story here... I'd like to hear the mother's side of this story...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-25-06 08:40 AM
Response to Reply #14
82. You're mistaking a trace for a lethal dose
Big mistake.

We can tolerate lots of lethal poisons in trace doses and cocaine isn't that lethal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-24-06 02:07 PM
Response to Reply #5
27. A long term study
that was done at UF showed that babies born to cocaine/crack user moms were not directly affected by the drug. Apparently, it does not cross the placenta.

I'm not sure of breastmilk but this story smells of bs to me. That would have to be a lot cocaine in there to cause death.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viva_La_Revolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-24-06 02:40 PM
Response to Reply #27
42. bull
you only have to hold a crack baby once to know it SERIOUSLY fucks them up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-24-06 02:46 PM
Response to Reply #42
46. I worked at Jackson in Miami
Edited on Wed May-24-06 02:47 PM by DoYouEverWonder
I've held more then a few crack babies.

I was offered the job to be the coordinator on a long term study done at UF, following babies born to moms who did crack during pregnancy. (I had to turn down the job for personal reasons).

After 10 years they found that the outcomes for these kids were not much different then kids from the same circumstances without the crack exposure. Believe me the results were a shock.

I'm sure they've published the results. I'll look for a link later.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viva_La_Revolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-24-06 02:52 PM
Response to Reply #46
50. maybe after 10 years or so, they catch up...
but they're first few days are hell for them. I don't see that it matters anyway, whether it's temporary or long-term, it's still abuse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-24-06 03:10 PM
Response to Reply #50
55. I agree
One good thing is that if you can find a better placement for these babies, their outcomes are pretty good. Unlike fetal alcohol syndrome kids. Those kids are a mess.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-24-06 03:27 PM
Response to Reply #46
58. You are correct. I've reviewed a number of cocaine outcome studies
that were being submitted for publication. (I was one of the peer reviewers). There's no "there there". The "crack baby" epidemic is the "epidemic" that never was.

I also know a good bit about breastfeeding, teratogenesis, etc. I doubt VERY seriously that cocaine in breastmilk killed this infant.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NuttyFluffers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-24-06 08:37 PM
Response to Reply #58
79. wow, thanks for the info!
but could you be so kind as to recommend any studies, journal articles, etc. that can tell me this. i actually enjoy a dry read every now and then. what should i be looking for in these studies?...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Asgaya Dihi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-25-06 09:12 AM
Response to Reply #79
83. Try this one
The crack baby thing is a myth and always has been a myth, it was a tool of hysteria to justify increased budgets for the drug war and prison growth. The following open letter to the media was released in 2004 by some of the top researchers in the nation and begs the media to stop the hysteria with the meth and crack baby myths.

As someone else said, there's no there there, and the hysteria kills.

http://advocatesforpregnantwomen.org/file/FFinalpress+Letter%20No%20More%20Crack%20Baby.pdf
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-24-06 08:09 PM
Response to Reply #42
78. They overcome it though
They did a longitudinal study in LA about 15 years ago. By the time these babies were in preschool, there was no sign they were born drug addicted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liontamer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-25-06 11:13 AM
Response to Reply #42
91. actually the "crack baby effect"
turned out to be fetal alcohol syndrome in disguise. Cocaine isn't usually that damaging to infants, but mothers who are doing crack while pregnant are usually also heavy drinkers
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-25-06 08:39 AM
Response to Reply #27
81. It does cross the placenta
but it doesn't have long term effects. What they were seeing when the original howl about "crack babies" went up were the horrible effects of poverty and deprivation, not the drug. When they discovered that, they dropped the issue rather than take on POVERTY.

The newborns were in tough shape, though, until the drug(s) cleared their bodies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lance_Boyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-24-06 12:34 PM
Response to Original message
8. if they only sampled the infant's blood,
how do they know the route of entry of the cocaine? Did they also sample and test the breast milk? TFA is a wee bit light on detail.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kaffiria Donating Member (77 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-24-06 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. well
well then what? she fed it to the kid? not any better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lance_Boyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-24-06 12:53 PM
Response to Reply #10
16. Lots more room for doubt in this case
if the breast milk was stored in a refrigerator, where someone other than the mother could've tainted it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJ_Lib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-24-06 01:24 PM
Response to Reply #16
21. If you're not an attorney, you should be...


... That's a damn good arguement...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-24-06 02:09 PM
Response to Reply #8
28. Good points
If the baby did test positive for cocaine, then they would have a real case.

Even if it didn't come from the breastmilk, it would have to come from somewhere and that would be a big problem for this mom.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jed Dilligan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-24-06 02:15 PM
Response to Original message
30. There's a lot of crap in a drug environment to kill a baby,
including gang bullets and police flash-bang grenades. I blame the War on Drugs as in all drug deaths.

This woman probably didn't tell her doctor about the cocaine because she was afraid of being busted. Whether it was the drug itself, or malnutrition, or general neglect that killed a baby, I don't know.

A cocaine addict has no business raising a child; the courts could have saved this baby if Sara Shelby was a medically supervised legal addict.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bridget Burke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-24-06 02:28 PM
Response to Original message
32. What percentage of coke was found in the blood?
Was it definitely the cause of the baby's death?

If so, are they sure breast milk was the source?

How do they KNOW the mother's intake of cocaine at the time?

Lots of questions...


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Texasgal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-24-06 02:28 PM
Response to Original message
33. It is a sad day on DU
When people start to defend a coke up Mother who put her child at risk.

I'll bet could post the picture of Britney Spears driving with her baby in her lap and that thread would go nutso, lambasting Spears... calling for her head. :eyes:

But go ahead and defend the coked out mother!! CRIPES! :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mandate My Ass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-24-06 02:30 PM
Response to Reply #33
34. She hasn't been convicted of anything yet
merely accused after SIDS was originally ruled as the cause of death. So I'll pass on the lynch mob for now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Texasgal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-24-06 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #34
40. The article said she has been charged.
So, she will go to court and have a jury of her peers decide her fate.

The only think I know is that a 5 month old baby has been found with cocaine in his bloodstream, something went WRONG. She better have a helluva defense!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lastliberalintexas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-24-06 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #40
64. And being charged with a crime means jack, TG
The state has proven nothing as of yet, and this article was very thin on facts.

I don't think it's a case of DUers defending a coked up mother so much as it is DUers asking others not to jump to conclusion without all the facts. :shrug:


I am continually dismayed at the hang 'em high sentiments expressed on this board. If even progressives are so quick to rush to judgment and/or swing the burden of proof to the defendant, then we are in serious trouble. Innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. It really is that simple, and that important.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beelzebud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-24-06 02:30 PM
Response to Reply #33
35. Agreed.
I'm going to be HATED for saying this by some, but here it goes anyway.

Everytime I see a story about a mother who kills her children, there is ALWAYS an element that comes out and basically says that no matter what a woman does to her kids, we should all feel sorry for her.

I don't buy that shit. If you drown your kids in a bathtub, cut their arms off, poison them with cocaine, or any other totally SICK shit, you deserve no less than life in prison.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bridget Burke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-24-06 02:34 PM
Response to Reply #35
37. You might be HATED.
Or you might be ignored.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beelzebud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-24-06 04:36 PM
Response to Reply #37
60. So be it.
If someone that thinks I'm a bad guy, for being hard on a mother who poisons her baby with cocaine, and wants to ignore me over it, I'll be the first to say: Please do!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mandate My Ass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-24-06 05:34 PM
Response to Reply #60
63. She has been accused of that offense, far from convicted
but "coke whore" just sounds so good you couldn't resist it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beelzebud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-24-06 06:47 PM
Response to Reply #63
73. If the shoe fits...
All the women I know don't abuse cocaine with a baby in the house.

I'm so sorry to offend you. How about Coke Mother. Is that more pleasing?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woo me with science Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-25-06 09:24 AM
Response to Reply #73
84. "Coke Mommie" nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Texasgal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-24-06 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #35
38. Yup... I am sure I'll have my ass flamed as well.
But when do we hold the parents responsible for their children?

5 month old babies have no one to DEFEND them! Where is the OUTRAGE???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mandate My Ass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-24-06 02:40 PM
Response to Reply #38
41. The baby died months ago
the cocaine turned up in lab tests just recently, but the prosecutor automatically assumes it came from breast milk. That's a big leap in my book.

Who's going to defend people from overzealous prosecution and long-term imprisonment before all the facts emerge and a defense can be mounted?

This is why we're the world's #1 jailer. We're taught to feel and express outrage against people who've been accused of crimes with an emotional impact. Let the process work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Texasgal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-24-06 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #41
47. Ofcourse I am going to let the process work
I am not stupid... I am aware that she will be going to trial.

I just find it horrible that people are so quick to defend the Mother, without knowing the facts either, or "letting the process" work.

Over zealous prosecutor? Thank GOD! Otherwise, this poor child died in vain, with no one to uncover the real truth. That baby needs a voice. I am glad that the prosecutor is over zealous.

Here is a question, if you were the procecutor and found the coke in the blood stream, how do you think a 5-month old child got it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mandate My Ass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-24-06 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #47
53. I'm not a prosecutor
It seems to me the mother is no longer lactating so testing her milk is not possible. As a poster above noted, if she pumped her breast milk and put it in the fridge anybody who had access to the home could've done it. The burden of proof is on the prosecutor.

I wonder how anybody here who's ready to pump the lethal injection into this woman would like to be judged on such little evidence.

I'm sorry you're haunted by all the shrieks from beyond the grave of newborns who died under similar circumstances. I'm not ready to toss living adults into the dung heap because of premature outrage over the death of a baby.

If she did it, fine. Do the crime, do the time. But I also think she's a sick, rather than evil, human being. I hope if she did this she gets help in addition to punishment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Texasgal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-24-06 03:05 PM
Response to Reply #53
54. Wow... pretty weird post there.
I am not "haunted by shreiks" of dead babies. Sheesh.

I am posting an opinion on an annoymous message board. I am conversing with someone who does not agree with me... but OH... I must be HAUNTED by the SHRIEKS of dead babies. :eyes:

Nevermind...I am done here. Thanks for playing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lastliberalintexas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-24-06 06:00 PM
Response to Reply #47
66. Google info about the Houston Crime Lab
Then get back to me about how happy you are that prosecutors are overzealous elected officials out to score a headline.


As to how the child might have gotten the cocaine in her system, there are plenty of ways other than through the breast milk. Has a vindictive boyfriend been ruled out? A babysitter? Do we really know for certain that this was the baby's blood and that the test results were accurate (again, se Houston Crime Lab)? Do we know for certain that the mother intentionally ingested cocaine? Or was it slipped to her somehow?


No offense, TG, because I usually like your posts. But I'd hate to have you on a jury.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Texasgal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-24-06 07:28 PM
Response to Reply #66
74. Hey.. I am not saying that she is guilty
I am just shocked at how many people take the mothers side BEFORE knowing any info... that's all. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elehhhhna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-25-06 11:29 AM
Response to Reply #66
93. Plus cross contamination at the lab...probably lots of coke residue ina
police lab.

Just saying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MelliMel Donating Member (233 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-24-06 02:44 PM
Response to Reply #35
45. I don't get it.
Somehow child abuse and neglect gets the ok and the "poor mother" gets sympathy, not the dead child.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Texasgal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-24-06 02:51 PM
Response to Reply #45
48. yeah...pretty weird.
Like I said... it's a sad day on DU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Texasgal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-24-06 02:51 PM
Response to Reply #45
49. yeah...pretty weird.
Like I said... it's a sad day on DU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lastliberalintexas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-24-06 06:03 PM
Response to Reply #45
67. Um, no the poor mother gets the presumption of innocence
Pretty simple concept that I'm sure you'd want the advantage of if YOU were the one who'd been merely *charged* with a crime.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Virginia Dare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-25-06 07:48 AM
Response to Reply #45
80. I get it...
it's because if this mother did poison her child with cocaine tainted breast milk, which is yet to be proven by the way, most likely she was not out to "kill" her baby. Most likely, it was an accident. Was she a neglectful mother by virtue of the fact that she was abusing cocaine? Possibly, and she needed help. Maybe she was in the process of getting help, none of us knows that. It's a tragedy all around, and at this point, I have sympathy for both mother and child. I could always change my mind as the facts come out though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lastliberalintexas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-24-06 05:55 PM
Response to Reply #35
65. What if it was an unintentional posioning?
What if the woman unknowingly ingested the cocaine which possibly led to this baby's death? What if there was a mix up with the blood at the ME's office (google Houston crime lab to feel oh so safe about your chances in front of a Harris County jury if DNA evidence is presented)? What if someone else gave the baby cocaine, either intentionally or not? What if the baby really died of SIDS and the blood test was conducted improperly?

Can you say that any of those possibilities have been ruled out? Do you know facts of this case that weren't in the thin article which was posted? Would you want someone like you on your jury?


But for the grace of god go I. Please don't ever serve on a jury- you apparently pre-judge every situation you hear about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-24-06 07:49 PM
Response to Reply #35
75. All that proves is that you know nothing about mental illness
And THAT'S why some of us defend Andrea Yates -- because we do. Hating someone for having a very real, very incapacitating illness isn't "not buying shit," it's showing that you really have no clue about psychosis and other extreme me mental illnesses.

But hey! If it makes you feel self righteous and warm and fuzzy about yourself, go for it! Let em know, too, when a male can get postpartum psychosis or breastfeed a baby. That'll interest the hell out of me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noonwitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-24-06 02:43 PM
Response to Original message
43. I think this is more of a criminal neglect case than a murder
The mother did not intend to poison her child, she intended to get high. I'm not justifying what she did, it is wrong, but it's not going to do much good for a prosecutor to overcharge her, either.


I'm surprised in West Branch that it's cocaine and not meth. Cocaine is more of a big-city drug in Michigan.

I wonder where the mother falls on the Weschler. Why was she breast feeding when she was doing drugs? I know women who smoke cigarettes that bottle feed their babies so they can start smoking again after they give birth. It's pretty common knowledge that whatever you consume ends up in the milk, so I'm thinking either she was born slow, or the drugs made her stupid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Texasgal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-24-06 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #43
52. Okay..so by your logic...
If I get drunk and drive my car, hitting and killing someone it's criminal neglect?

" But..but..Officer, no one told me that alcohol can screw up my driving skills!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pooja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-25-06 10:40 AM
Response to Original message
90. lets look at the bigger picture
Here is a good case for preventative measures. There are usually 2 reasons to breast feed. One the natural goodness, two its free. Since she was using cocaine I am going to make a biased judgement and say that the girl was probably doing it for the "free" reason. If she had been able to get free birth control, would we be talking about this trajedy. Also, in the pre-natal months, were there signs that she would be unable to handle a child.... How many potential adoptive parents would have done better.... we need to take the babies out of irresponsible people's hands.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Asgaya Dihi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-25-06 11:20 AM
Response to Reply #90
92. Punishment before a crime?
Maybe instead of trying to guess who's worthy to have a kid or not we should educate and regulate. Street dealers don't give a damned, they'll sell to anyone. If the stuff was regulated she'd have had to buy from a regulated professional who would have known better and stopped or educated her.

But no, better to find someone to kick. Forget about preventing it before it happens, let's just punish them after.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressivebydesign Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-25-06 01:53 PM
Response to Original message
96. 'You need a license to drive a car but any asshole can have a kid'
One of my favorite movie lines.. ever, from Parenthood.

Drug and alcohol abusing parents amaze me. They do shit like this, then they're the same ones that hold press conferences that the police endangered their children during a raid. No one is fucking stupid enough to believe that doing coke while breastfeeding would not harm your baby. WTF is she doing cocaine for with a tiny baby in her care?? Poor little baby.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 11:56 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC