Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Was gay-marriage an issue in 2000 election?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-02-06 11:23 AM
Original message
Was gay-marriage an issue in 2000 election?
If not, why not? We do know that it was a big issue in the 2004 elections and that the Repubs used it to their advantage in most of the states in which it was on the ballot? When did this become an issue and who's actually pushing this issue, the gays or the Republican Party? And why now?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Charlie Brown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-02-06 11:30 AM
Response to Original message
1. Bush and Cheney both said it should be left to "the states" in 2000
Edited on Fri Jun-02-06 11:32 AM by Charlie Brown
what a couple of flip-floppers.

Cheney was quick to push the fact that his dauther was a lesbian in his debate w/Lieberman, to show how kind, loving, and tolerant the GOP had become.:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
monarch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-02-06 11:32 AM
Response to Original message
2. If it is an issue, it hurts Lieberman--he's against it,
even though he claims to be pro-gay. Another untrue but weasely position on gay rights and the the way he claims to be pro-choice, pro-civil-rights, pro-environment, anti-Alito etc. etc. when actual votes hurt the cause.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leeroysphitz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-02-06 11:37 AM
Response to Original message
3. I think at that point they were actually trying to not scare away
the moderates and undecideds (with a "wink and a nod" to the fundies who were, at the time, willing to put up with a lot more than they are today in order to get "God's candidate" into office).

Now that they are IN they aren't letting things slide so much and are demanding screwball issues like this be pushed and the pukes know they have lost most moderates and undecideds (and they aren't coming back anytime soon.) so their best hope is to shamelessly pander to their "base" (fundies etc...)

Just my take on it...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-02-06 11:38 AM
Response to Original message
4. Marriage was not "under attack" in 2000.
It's an emergency now because marriage is clearly threatened. :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johnnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-02-06 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
5. It wasn't
It became a big issue a few months before the 2004 elections and was put on 11 state ballots almost overnight. For the life of me I can't figure out why. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-02-06 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. To appease the religious right
who would vote for the shrub....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-02-06 11:54 AM
Response to Original message
6. A bit of history...
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060602/ap_on_go_pr_wh/bush_gay_marriage;_ylt=AilceZW6Kxx7FHJQ_DOBp1eWwvIE;_ylu=X3oDMTA4NGRzMjRtBHNlYwMxNjk5

<snip>
A slim majority of Americans oppose gay marriage, according to a poll by the Pew Research Center for the People and the Press from March. But the poll also showed attitudes are changing: 63 percent opposed gay marriage in February 2004.

Those poll results don't reflect how people might feel about amending the Constitution to ban gay marriage.

The Massachusetts Supreme Court decided to legalize such marriages in 2003. A year later, San Francisco issued thousands of marriage licenses to gay couples.

This November, initiatives banning same-sex marriages are expected to be on the ballot in Idaho, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Virginia and Wisconsin. In 2004, 13 states approved initiatives prohibiting gay marriage or civil unions, with 11 states casting votes on Election Day.

....more
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 01:13 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC