Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

the military girl from yesterday is back on Randi's show

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-02-06 04:37 PM
Original message
the military girl from yesterday is back on Randi's show
:popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
gatorboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-02-06 04:39 PM
Response to Original message
1. What happened yesterday with her?
Edited on Fri Jun-02-06 04:39 PM by gatorboy
Can ya elaborate, purty please? :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-02-06 04:42 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. She's a captain
She said she's fighting the war because of 9/11. Even after Randi played the clip of Bush saying we have no evidence connecting Iraq with 9/11, this captain kept insisting there was not enough information to prove that Iraq was not involved with 9/11.

I'll be interested in hearing part two of this saga!

Please feed the cube rats!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-02-06 04:43 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. yes what you said
Sorry cube rats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Critters2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-02-06 04:46 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. Oh, right
Tell me again how I should support the troops. She is "the troops".

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-02-06 05:03 PM
Response to Reply #9
23. I think we need to support them...
in spite of them... they are on Kool-Aid OD mode. They didn't ask for this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Critters2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-02-06 05:07 PM
Response to Reply #23
26. A) They volunteered
These are not draftees.

B)I fear that constantly telling them "we support you no matter what" has contributed to the atrocities. You can't tell people they're okay with you no matter what. There must be limits to appropriate behavior. I don't support the troops in any kind of blanket way. That is dangerous.

As this "captain" proves. As Haditha proves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-02-06 05:26 PM
Response to Reply #26
29. True, they were not drafted
But who volunteers to be lied to? They had the noblest of intentions. They thought they were joining the service to protect their country. They are the brainwashees, remember. No one asks for that. The only thing Haditha proves is that these soldiers are at the breaking point, stretched too thin and abused by their commander in chief. Those guys are bat-shit-nuts now and will probably never be right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Critters2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-02-06 05:34 PM
Response to Reply #29
32. Again, I can't count how many times military members,
their family or friends have told me, with pride, that their job is to "kill people and break things". They're good at it, too.

But I don't think it took much brainwashing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Breeze54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-02-06 07:39 PM
Response to Reply #26
38. Not 'all' volunteered
There IS a 'BACK DOOR DRAFT'!

"backdoor draft n. extension of military enlistments through stop-loss orders,
which force personnel to involuntarily extend their tours of duty."


http://www.csmonitor.com/2006/0131/dailyUpdate.html

Stop-loss used to retain 50,000 US troops
By Tom Regan | csmonitor.com

"Stop-loss," a policy used by the Army to keep US soldiers and reservists in the military beyond
the date when their service was supposed to end,
has been used on more than 50,000 members of the armed forces since the war in Iraq began.
Currently stop-loss is being used to extend the duty of 12,500 troops.
Reuters reports that the measure applies to units about to deploy to Afghanistan or Iraq.

Under the policy, soldiers who normally would leave when their commitments expire must remain
in the Army, starting 90 days before their unit is scheduled to depart,
through the end of their deployment and up to another 90 days after returning to their home base.
With yearlong tours in Iraq and Afghanistan, some soldiers can be forced to stay in the Army an extra 18 months.


The military argues that it is a necessary step to preserve the cohesive nature of a unit, especially one ready to fight,
and courts have backed the military so far in any challenge against the policy.
But critics say it is just another illustration of how stretched out the US Army and reserves
have become, and that could undercut increased effort to attract new recruits.

"As the war in Iraq drags on, the Army is accumulating a collection of problems
that cumulatively could call into question the viability of an all-volunteer force,"
said defense analyst Loren Thompson of the Lexington Institute think tank.
"When a service has to repeatedly resort to compelling the retention of people who want
to leave, you're edging away from the whole notion of volunteerism."


A recent Pentagon report written for the Department of Defense by Andrew Krepinevich,
a former military officer, said stop-loss was a "short-term fix" enabling the Army to meet deployment requirements,
but that such policies "risk breaking the force as recruitment and retention problems mount."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
htuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-02-06 04:55 PM
Response to Reply #2
17. I find it fascinating how they turn logic on it's head...
...to avoid admitting that they were lied to by Bush and their commanders.

There's not enough information to prove that the Queen of England isn't a hostile space alien simply masquerading as the Queen, either. That's hardly enough to justify an invasion and occupation of Britain, though.

The whole 'proving a negative' business is kind of difficult.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-02-06 04:57 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. proving a negative is how Bush convinced most to invade Iraq
Saddam was supposed to "prove" he had no WMD. :wtf:

I remember fighting this back in 2003 with so many brainwashed people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-02-06 05:07 PM
Response to Reply #18
25. The problem is
There were no WMD and Hans Blix confirmed that Hussein's assertions he did not have WMD were true. After that, all the RWNuts insisted that Hussein threw the inspectors out! Yeah, in 1985 or thereabouts, yes, yes he did. BUSH threw Blix and the inspectors out of Iraq this time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-02-06 05:02 PM
Response to Reply #17
21. Well, in this case
She has her commander-in-chief saying very clearly that there is no connection, yet she still insists there is.

I don't think this is a case of proving a negative under those circumstances. There's nothing to left to prove... Bush proved it himself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-02-06 04:42 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. she still believed she went to Iraq cuz of 9/11
and her commanders, good Christian men, wouldn't lie to her about that.

poor thing.

in the dark indeed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tempest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-02-06 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. If she still believes this, then she is willfully ignorant
And there's nothing worse in the world than choosing to believe something you know to be false.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PA Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-02-06 04:46 PM
Original message
She is now saying that it still a "possibility" that
Saddam helped in the 9-11 plot. Randi is actually doing a great job dealing with her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donco6 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-02-06 04:47 PM
Response to Original message
11. Randi's pretty good with servicepeople.
She's got some credibility, at least.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-02-06 04:48 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. yes, she was once in the military
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tempest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-02-06 04:52 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. And she comes from a military family
Her father and brothers also served.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donco6 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-02-06 04:46 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. That's Randi's point with her.
She keeps pounding on her that she can't afford to keep herself in the dark, she needs to read, get information, stop believing what everyone is telling her - find out for herself. She is ignoring the facts that already exist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tempest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-02-06 04:53 PM
Response to Reply #10
15. That's the way military commanders like their underlings
Dumb and ignorant of the facts.

Can't get them to fight against someone who hasn't done anything to you otherwise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PA Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-02-06 04:43 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. She said that her Christian commanders would not lie to her
She also said she was fighting because we were attacked. Randi has been talking about how so many of the troops still believe that Saddam was part of 9-11.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Critters2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-02-06 04:45 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Well, then they aren't Christians
cuz they're lying. Get it?

Morans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-02-06 04:46 PM
Response to Original message
8. Good conversation. Kind of courageous of her to call back.
Edited on Fri Jun-02-06 04:48 PM by BrklynLiberal
She is calling to become informed, Not to argue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donco6 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-02-06 04:51 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. It was a good call yesterday, too.
She's not argumentative - maybe just a little stubborn, which is OK in my book. But to remain willfully ignorant - there's no excuse for that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wryter2000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-02-06 05:51 PM
Response to Reply #13
33. It was a good conversation
I was proud of both of them. The captain backed off on the link between 9/11 and Saddam at the end.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-02-06 05:12 PM
Response to Reply #8
27. Happy to hear that!
A little light must have pierced the darkness.

I wish Randi would ask her about that Bush clip... why would he say that? Does she believe her commander in chief tells her the truth? And why would her commander in chief tell her one thing and her fine Christian commanders tell her something else?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LibertyorDeath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-02-06 04:54 PM
Response to Original message
16. Maybe Randi can introduce her to the concept of Brainwashing
She can just hand her a mirror.

Good morning Judge your honor as I will show
the Lack of Proof as it pertains to the FACTS in this Case
means nothing were going to show if you go by your
Gut and Blind Faith you too can sound like a complete fucking imbecile.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-02-06 04:59 PM
Response to Original message
19. This is why although I support the military - I fear it more
Military who believe the prez because he's "a good x-tian man" would shoot me dead if he told them to do it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PA Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-02-06 05:02 PM
Response to Original message
20. One piece of encouragement is the fact that this woman is LISTENING
to Randi's show in the first place. Yesterday and now today, she has been exposed to something other than the official line of propaganda. Maybe her eyes are starting to open. We can only hope that she will take Randi's advice and do some of her own research.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Velveteen Ocelot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-02-06 05:03 PM
Response to Original message
22. "Girl"?
She may be misinformed, but she's a military officer and a helicopter pilot. Not a "girl."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-02-06 05:19 PM
Response to Reply #22
28. I was trying to give folks a quick heads up
Edited on Fri Jun-02-06 05:19 PM by LSK
Sorry I didnt get her name, rank and serial number.

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Velveteen Ocelot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-02-06 05:32 PM
Response to Reply #28
31. "Woman" would do.
If you're over 18 you're not a girl. Sorry, but this old feminist gets a little prickly when she hears any professional woman being referred to as a girl.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-02-06 05:52 PM
Response to Reply #31
35. ok, be sure to tell SeattleGirl, NYCGirl and the other "girls" on DU
Edited on Fri Jun-02-06 06:04 PM by LSK
However, I will concede I could have worded it better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-02-06 05:29 PM
Response to Reply #22
30. I myself completely arbitrarily use myself as the measuring stick...
... and consistently refer to females younger than me as girls, and males younger than me as boys. Men and women are people older than me.

While that convention can certainly be criticized, it's not possible to criticize it on the grounds of sexism, methinks.

Possibly there are other folks who operate on something of a similar principle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-02-06 05:52 PM
Response to Reply #30
34. I do
We are all boys and girls, except people who are older, like you said. At work we are ladies and gentlemen regardless of age due to a very strict, old school corporate upbringing. I cringe when someone calls me "ma'am"!

Not sexist at all. Nope. Not one little bit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-02-06 06:10 PM
Response to Reply #30
37. In Eritrea a girl only becomes a woman when
she loses her virginity. You can be a 12 year old woman or a 30 girl. You can tell the difference from a distance. Look at their hair. Girls have their hair parted in the middle, the braids up and down. Women's had no part, and their braids face the back.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-03-06 01:07 PM
Response to Reply #37
39. That's another way to go.... but what about boys?
Edited on Sat Jun-03-06 01:09 PM by BlooInBloo
Is there some visible mark of their deflowering? ROFL - what a funny word.


EDIT: When I say "that's another way to go", it should not be taken as *endorsement* of that route. I don't endorse it - I think it's sickeningly sexist, and most likely somewhat similar to "scarlet letter"-style practice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-03-06 03:19 PM
Response to Reply #39
41. It's a very sexist society. The revolution changed it somewhat.
female circumcision was frowned upon, whereas when the church held sway, it was the norm.

On the wedding night the bride carries a white towel to bed with her. After consummation, the bloody towel is given to the mother and she displays it to the village. If she doesn't bleed, she is banished. I bet many times she cuts herself to induce bleeding. I knew a woman who got married a 13, got pregnant on her wedding night and her husband never touched her again. He left and she had to raise their son on her own. She was a clerk at a laundry. Her family was powerful in the region so she was lucky compared to the others. Many of the others in the same situation had to resort to prostitution to survive. Divorce was illegal, remarriage impossible. Marriages were all arraigned, no marriage for love.

The circumcision is pretty brutal. The girls are taken to the church. They have to sit on a bench with other girls. The priest comes along with his knife, the girl pulls up her skirt and he cuts her. His helper douses her with antiseptic and the move on. If the girl cries out, that means she has been touched, and she will be banished as unclean.

Ethiopian and Eritrean mean can have mistresses, can leave home for extended times. The wife has to stay home and suffer as he goes his merry way.

Women are not allowed to pray in the same church as men. They can't even enter the grounds of the church.

The revolution has made some changes in women's rights, but I don't know what changes were made and how well they have stood.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-03-06 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #41
42. Your name makes me hungry.
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-03-06 04:04 PM
Response to Reply #42
43. It was my Fettuccine Alfredo that got me that name.
I made it with Artichoke hearts, pimento, and a lot of cheese and heavy cream. That was back in the days when I was cycling 300 miles a week and could burn off the fat quickly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-03-06 04:18 PM
Response to Reply #43
44. mmmm.... with blackened chicken breast....
yumyumyum
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-03-06 04:22 PM
Response to Reply #44
45. Anything with blackened chicken breasts is yummy.
Well, maybe not a banana milk shake.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-03-06 04:36 PM
Response to Reply #45
46. LOL - troo that!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-02-06 05:05 PM
Response to Original message
24. Doh - I was in CatWoman's thread - didn't realize there were two...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-02-06 05:53 PM
Response to Original message
36. can you please call her a woman next time
I have grave doubts that had this been a male captain your op headline would have read "the military boy from yesterday is back on Randi's show"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-03-06 01:13 PM
Response to Reply #36
40. "Grave doubts?" "Are there any other kind?" ROFLMAO!
:rofl:

sorry - I'm still hungover...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 04:32 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC