Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

People....it's not "voter fraud"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
New Earth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-03-06 11:07 AM
Original message
People....it's not "voter fraud"
Edited on Sat Jun-03-06 11:09 AM by Faye
I have been fighting this framing since the 04 election, mostly in the Election Reform forum.
I still come out to the other forums and elsewhere on the internet and see people still using the phrase "voter fraud".

While there may be a few cases where the voter actually commits the fraud, what we are usually referring to around here is the bread term for any fraud in an election, which is election fraud, specifically the fraud committed by the election officials with hacked machines or shortage of machines, or suppression of voters. The bulk of the fraud in elections is fraud committed AGAINST the voters.

Most of you, I'm sure, know that the Republicans have been trying to pass laws to make it harder for citizens to vote. Trying to make it required to show ID, etc. Their so-called reason for doing this is to prevent "voter fraud", this is the term THEY use, to refer to those very few who may have been a voter committing some kind of fraud in their vote.

Can you see the difference? Maybe it's just a pet peeve of mine, but over the years most people have agreed once it's pointed out to them.
Please please please, do not use "voter fraud" unless you are specifically referring to a voter who committed fraud. Only because --- once people get familiar with the Republicans definition of "voter fraud", and they then hear about what the real problem is (machines, etc) being referred to as "voter fraud", the issue is going to be blurry. "OMG VOTER FRAUD WAS RAMPANT IN THIS PAST ELECTION". People are going to think it was just a bunch of voters cheating in the vote somehow and not realize it was fraud committed AGAINST the voters.

Perfect example of real "voter fraud" Ann Coulter. She tried to vote in 2 different towns/precincts? Don't know the whole story but the gist of it, but that is real "voter fraud".

Anyway - not trying to tell anyone what to do but you know :shrug:

i guess it's about framing and semantics.
:spank:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tanyev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-03-06 11:15 AM
Response to Original message
1. Now that you mention it, the Ann Coulter story is the perfect
opportunity to frame this.

Stolen election = Election fraud
Ann Coulter = Voter fraud

Thx for pointing it out!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
left is right Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-03-06 11:16 AM
Response to Original message
2. Exactly right
Ann Coulter is almost certainly guilty of voter fraud. Everything else is election fraud. And isn't it amazing that both frauds were perpetrated by the same group of people?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jade Fox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-03-06 11:17 AM
Response to Original message
3. Thank you....
Yes, that framing makes all the difference in the world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
feelthebreeze Donating Member (570 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-03-06 11:21 AM
Response to Original message
4. Faye...
Been following your argument since the 04 challenge by Boxer. Still holds as true today as ever. We hopefully will see a huge awakening to these fundamental issues of our vote. Don't stop beating the drum and framing the argument around those who perpetuate this anti democratic fraud. Thanks for all the years of service Faye.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Janice325 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-03-06 11:24 AM
Response to Original message
5. Thanks for pointing that out, Faye.
Edited on Sat Jun-03-06 11:26 AM by Janice325
Point taken. I hadn't thought of it that way, but I guess I wasn't thinking,d'uh.
I can see where that's been a "pet peeve" of yours, and deservedly so. Besides, "election fraud" does sound much more serious.
I hope Ann Coulter does get convicted of "voter fraud." (and thanks to Ann for being so kind and being such a good example of "voter fraud" for us. Way to go, Ann.:rofl:)
k&r
Now, anytime I'm on a thread where "voter fraud" is used incorrectly, I'll add my two cents and say "are you referring to 'election fraud?'"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gormy Cuss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-03-06 11:26 AM
Response to Original message
6. Voter fraud: voting under false pretenses.
Election fraud: engineering a manipulation of the vote results.


Sometimes election fraud takes the form of coordinated vote fraud. I think that's where the language gets confusing. If someone arranged for people to show up at polling places and claim to be someone they're not, or arranged for the registrations of people ineligible to vote, that's election fraud. The people who filled out the ballots committed voter fraud.

There is very little unorganized voter fraud.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-03-06 11:32 AM
Response to Original message
7. ANY rhetorical sloppiness can and will be used against you.
Election fraud it is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lydia Leftcoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-03-06 11:33 AM
Response to Original message
8. Let's call it what it really is: election tampering
:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-03-06 11:34 AM
Response to Original message
9. kick and nominating n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johnaries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-03-06 11:37 AM
Response to Original message
10. See, Faye - you need to spend more time in GD.
:hi:
Of course, I should spend more time in ERD. I'll admit I haven't been there in a while. :spank:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
New Earth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-03-06 11:42 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. welll I will be here more often now
chasing down all the "voter fraud" posts like i used to in ERD :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-03-06 11:44 AM
Response to Original message
12. Right. NEVER let them set the language. Rephrase. Reframe. Attack.
As long as we accept their framing, we're on the defensive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bettyellen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-03-06 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
13. you go faye!
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
New Earth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-03-06 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. hi betty
is that cat..........blue? :wtf: :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bettyellen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-03-06 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #16
23. no, she's a smoked tortoise cornish rex
Edited on Sat Jun-03-06 12:40 PM by bettyellen
it came out odd on my camera phone.
but yes, those are boobs.
LOL.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
New Earth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-03-06 12:38 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. omg WTF
i didn't even notice the boobs. those are some big boobies for a cat :scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bettyellen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-03-06 12:41 PM
Response to Reply #25
27. search for me and Caindy
and you'll find better pics of her and her little friend sweet pea, both recent mommies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hootinholler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-03-06 01:02 PM
Response to Reply #27
31. Hey B.E.
:hi:

Couldnt give Faye a hug and not you.

:hug:

-Hoot
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bettyellen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-03-06 01:15 PM
Response to Reply #31
34. tks! it's like DC all over again!
always good to see you hoot!
:HUG:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Janice325 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-03-06 12:20 PM
Response to Original message
14. Election fraud it is!
Thanks again, Faye. Don't let "them" (whoever they might be) drive you nuts.
Please keep up the good work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-03-06 12:21 PM
Response to Original message
15. Not election fraud either - it's STOLEN ELECTION
Fraud implies a few crooked things here and there - like Illinois with Nixon. Stolen is where such fraud amounts to OVERTURNING the national result.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
New Earth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-03-06 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. stolen election is fine too
Edited on Sat Jun-03-06 12:23 PM by Faye
as long as it references the election, machines, etc. and not the voter (unless of course, it is a specific case where the voter is at fault)
(in my opinion)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-03-06 12:28 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. Oh, I got your point just fine - just added another.
The "voter" BS is an excuse for ID cards, literacy tests and other disenfrenchising techniques.
I was just adding the point that while fraud existed more or less in all elections, it only amounted to steals since 2000 onwards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MH1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-03-06 07:25 PM
Response to Reply #15
47. You can have fraud without it changing the outcome.
And it's still just as wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Patsy Stone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-03-06 12:22 PM
Response to Original message
17. True then
and true now! :hi:, Faye!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-03-06 12:25 PM
Response to Original message
19. I first came here (+ became aware of DU) when organizing a protest after
the '04 election in Cols OH. It was suggested that DU would reach the audience I was looking for. One of my first memories here, Faye is of you commenting on the term Election fraud NOT voter fraud. Glad your posting again instead of lurking!

Are you ready for round 2 of Huff Po?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
New Earth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-03-06 12:34 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. not sure
Edited on Sat Jun-03-06 12:35 PM by Faye
if and when i'm going to submit it again. i'm going to go through garybeck's election fraud DVD and see if there is anything else in there can be submitted. my video is on his DVD as well. the only thing is, the submission has to be something original. if what's on the DVD is all filled with just news pieces or just straight up video with no creative side to it, i don't think they are going to accept it. he sent me the link to d/l it but i haven't had time yet, will prob. get to that today. then maybe i'll still submit mine and he can submit one on his DVD, that way there is double the exposure, alongside RFK's new article. :bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cascadiance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-03-06 12:27 PM
Response to Original message
20. Another to keep separate is "campaign finance fraud"...
That's really a separate issue too when someone talks about election fraud. They really should be tackled as separate issues, as they require completely separate solutions (public financing, etc. for campaign finance fraud, accountable voting machines for election fraud). Sometimes when someone says "Clean Elections" they aren't really sure which issue that term refers to, when those who know about it know that it refers to fighting campaign financing fraud with public financing of elections.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoodleyAppendage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-03-06 12:38 PM
Response to Original message
24. I call it a "successful coup attempt".
We have been subject to 6 years of no less than a complete coup de etat by radical forces seeking to transform our representational democracy to a theocratic/fascist state.

J
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
New Earth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-03-06 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. fine with me
i don't care if people call it cat piss, just don't call it voter fraud!!!!! :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kip Humphrey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-03-06 12:43 PM
Response to Original message
28. Repeat after me: E-L-E-C-T-I-O-N fraud... Get it?
For VOTER fraud, SEE Ann Coulter!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-03-06 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #28
41. But it's not the ELECTION that's committing the fraud!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-03-06 08:23 PM
Response to Reply #41
48. Perhaps "GOPer fraud" is more to your taste?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hootinholler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-03-06 12:59 PM
Response to Original message
29. Hey Faye!
:hi:

How ya been girl?

:hug:

-Hoot
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
New Earth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-03-06 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #29
30. good
always been lurking around here just stopped posting for a whille. thanks to Mod Mom, i've been re-inspired :)

just working, obsessing over my favorite bands, just moved a few months ago back to a town i used to live in before, waiting for my sweet prince to come and get me so we can be together :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Balbus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-03-06 01:12 PM
Response to Original message
32. I prefer to the term "strategize about upcoming elections"
instead of whining and making up loony stories about why we lost the last elections. But that's just me...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
New Earth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-03-06 01:15 PM
Response to Reply #32
33. sure
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe Chi Minh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-03-06 02:26 PM
Response to Original message
35. Can't be repeated often enough, and it looks like it will have to
Edited on Sat Jun-03-06 02:27 PM by KCabotDullesMarxIII
be repeated ad infinitum. Sometimes an imprecise use of words can be so counter-productive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grace0418 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-03-06 03:05 PM
Response to Original message
36. So what is child abuse?
I always thought it was children being abused; who knew children could be so violent?

Sorry to be snarky but I think voter fraud can also mean defrauding voters from a fair and proper counting of their votes. Anyone with half a brain can determine through context whether the person voting was being dishonest or whether they themselves were the victim. If they don't have half a brain then they probably don't give a shit about any of it. Besides, we're talking about people who think "liberal" is a dirty word because they never bothered to read the definition.

Anyway, there are lots of words and phrases in the English language that can have multiple meanings and need context in order to be properly defined. Instead of getting so hot and bothered about the proper definition of voter fraud/election fraud, let's just fight to put a stop to all of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
New Earth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-03-06 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #36
37. i've heard that argument before
Edited on Sat Jun-03-06 03:17 PM by Faye
also heard someone trying to use the "consumer fraud" phrase against me.

the main point is 'framing' the issue politically. that is a part of doing something to stop it.
if you haven't noticed, "framing" is one of the Republicans "weapons"



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grace0418 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-05-06 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #37
50. Well I think I actually answered this in my other post but I'll say it
here too. I don't think this is an issue of framing. I think it's an issue of pet peeves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
New Earth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-03-06 03:18 PM
Response to Reply #36
38. besides
Edited on Sat Jun-03-06 03:19 PM by Faye
aren't you the one who i asked a while back to change your sticker from "voter fraud" to "election fraud"?

you thought i made sense back then, and even changed it :shrug:

i also bought one
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grace0418 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-05-06 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #38
49. I did indeed. You are correct.
Edited on Mon Jun-05-06 01:38 PM by grace0418
And I certainly didn't want to insult anyone, so I changed the artwork when you asked me. But the more I thought about it the more I came to realize that it's just another one of those quirks of the English language that needs context. So to me both ways are correct.

My point was that this argument has become more like the work of the Grammar Police than a matter of framing, especially when the title of the thread sounds like an admonishment and the post is complete with a smiley paddling another smiley.

I'm sorry, I just don't personally agree that insisting on the phrase "election fraud" qualifies as "framing" because I believe most people who care about the issue of stolen elections understand who is doing the stealing. Even folks who have told me I am nuts for believing that the 2000 and 2004 elections were stolen seem to understand that I'm not talking about my 75-yr-old neighbor sneaking in extra votes for Bush. They all know I believe BushCo committed the fraud, even if they think I'm a loon.

As far as I'm concerned, both phrases are correct, along with "election theft," "stolen election," "felony," "high crimes" and a number of other names. A stolen election by any name smells just as foul. Call it what you will, but I'm more concerned about stopping it than framing it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurovski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-03-06 03:25 PM
Response to Original message
39. K&R
It is what it is: ELECTION FRAUD. Most Voters are just trying to vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-03-06 03:31 PM
Response to Original message
40. And I guess it's not "securities fraud"?
Because, after all, it's not the securities that are committing the fraud. Can you see the difference?

And I guess it's not "child abuse" either, since it's not the child that's committing the abuse. Can you see the difference?

Nor would it be an "oil embargo", since it's not the oil that's doing the embargoing...

i guess it really IS about framing and semantics.

Sheesh. Somebody shoot me now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
New Earth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-03-06 04:32 PM
Response to Reply #40
42. you obviously didn't read the entire original post
and you don't have to be so rude.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-03-06 04:49 PM
Response to Reply #42
43. And it's not "chicken alfredo", because it's not the CHICKEN...
... that's the alfredo after all...

And it's not "half sister", because it's not the half that's actually the sister...

:rofl:

You are right on one thing tho: I don't HAVE to be so rude.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Justice Is Comin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-03-06 04:56 PM
Response to Original message
44. Vote "Rigging"
is the term we need to get out there. Nothing will identify quicker with most people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-03-06 05:25 PM
Response to Original message
45. I've never called it 'voter fraud'
And I've heard the term many times. And yes, it's a misnomer.

But that's the reason the GOP wants to use these machines or so they say. They're concerned (so they claim) that they're protecting against massive ballot stuffing or illegal voter registration by Democratic agents.

Let's try not to use that erroneous term.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jarnocan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-03-06 05:29 PM
Response to Original message
46. I have occasionally goofed-but here is another concern I have
but usually I say election fraud or fruadulent elections
This thing about being fined for not turning in registrations on time -is frightening for many reasons, ONE is that the repub operatives who pretend they are holding non-partisan registration drives will be able to destroy the dem ones and just say- "oops had to do it- we didn't get them in on time".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 07:15 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC