Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Would it help if we all got divorced?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
demgurl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-06-06 04:38 PM
Original message
Would it help if we all got divorced?
Disclaimer: I know this may come across as being fantastical or sarcastioc but I am not trying to be either.

I am sick that so many people in our society have no right to marry someone they wish to make a life long commitment with. What would happen if heterosexuals were told that we could not marry each other and we were made out to be second class citizens?

Last night I had along talk with my husband. I told him I do not feel like I should even wear my wedding ring and that perhaps I should just put it on a chain, around my neck, until gays are allowed to marry.

That is all fine and good except that the government will not care that I refuse to wear my ring. They will not even notice. No, this needed to be something that everyone would pay attention to. This needed to be something big.

I love my husband and I feel he is my soul mate. I do not wish to divorce him but there are a lot of people who do not wish to remain single but are forced to do so. I am not sure if people would be interested but I was thinking about the news it would create if all of a sudden marriage shot up 1000% all at once. I would rather stand by my fellow citizens, who happen to be gay, than to be married and let this kind of hate go on.

Love is so hard to find in this life and who is our government to say that two people may not declare their love legally? These are people who have put up with so much hate but are still together and have an even more solid foundation for it.

I know this sounds extreme but could it work if enough of us did it? Someone would have to sit up and take notice of the numbers. Sometimes desperate times call for desperate measures. The government does not seem to listen to us so perhaps the statistics would speak for us and news reports would be done about these actions. We have to do something to get their attention and express our outrage. They do not listen to marches and protests.

Would this work?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-06-06 04:42 PM
Response to Original message
1. Well, I already am, so it's OK with me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redwitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-06-06 04:42 PM
Response to Original message
2. two thirds of all marriages already end in divorce
Not sure anyone would notice except you. The legal/financial/medical problems would preclude my taking part. Not practical but I get where your heart is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KyndCulture Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-06-06 04:43 PM
Response to Original message
3. I'm divorced twice.
I lend somebody one of mine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
panader0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-06-06 04:44 PM
Response to Original message
4. Hey, I got divorced three times and it helped every time
While that is true, it points out the fact that marriage between heteros doesn't always work either. It's not the institution, it's the people involved. It shouldn't ever have been an issue. And smirky is about to go though a divorce too, if you believe the gossip rags in the checkout line.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-06-06 04:46 PM
Response to Original message
5. I'm Not Gettin Married Until Every Gay In America Is Married !!!
Does that help?

sorry... :silly:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-06-06 04:50 PM
Response to Original message
6. How about a symbolic divorce from marriage itself?
Protest idea:

Couples can hold un-weddings in front of churches and divorce themselves from the institution of marriage.

It does not mean *at all* couples will be breaking up, separating etc., but places the onus on the church, which has not done enough to stop the bigotry within its ranks.

Even if some folks are not married, they can still find a friend and pretend to be married for the purposes of this protest.

People can brings signs with huge 'un-marriage' certificates. :D


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demgurl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-06-06 05:28 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. I like that idea a lot.
I wonder if we could get a movement started for that? I bet it would get some attention - especially if you did it at the start of Sunday service!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-06-06 06:18 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. See my post in GD
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demgurl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-06-06 07:39 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. SwampRat.....
You are so creative and that is why I love your posts. I don't care who does not agree with your other post, at the very least I love your certificate. I want to be just like you when I finally get a handle on computer creativity. I have never posted this, but want to say how much I love your pix.

Keep up the great work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-06-06 07:49 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Thanks
:hug: Need I say I often enjoy your posts? :loveya:

I was hoping for a few more responses to my thread, but maybe the night shift will see it and like it. :shrug:

Personally, I am not going to stand by and let bigots repress others, no matter their gender, race, ethnic background, religious affiliation, or sexual preference.

This is AMERICA! Land of the FREE!

:patriot:

About doing pix: I started out with crappy free programs that I had to use for different stages (one for text, one for color manipulation, etc.). Then I bought Photoshop Elements 3.0, a pared down version of the very expensive professional application. Elements has a lot of limitations, but it does allow me to do a lot... and it's under $100 bucks! :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demgurl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-06-06 08:38 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. I agree, it is wrong to let anyone be oppressed.
It would be a much better world if more people just lived and live.

Hubby is a big computer person so I may get him to start me on a few programs and then I can work my way up - never, of course to your status. :yourock: (they do not have a bowing down to greatness smilie!) But at least I can feel encouraged things that you do can be done, at some point, if I just keep at it.

Thank you for your kind words and I did k & r your other post.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TallahasseeGrannie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-06-06 05:26 PM
Response to Original message
7. I admire your passion
about this issue. Would it work? I don't know. It is not something that I am personally willing to do. My marriage is the most important thing in my life and I am not altruistic enough to protest in this manner.

My hope is that time is going to take care of this issue. I see/hear changes almost daily. It is a huge adjustment for people to make. Just a generation ago we were taught by parents, churches, schools, doctors, the media, that homosexuality was perversion. That level of indoctrination doesn't go away over night.

I try and do my part as a teacher by encouraging respect for all people and I am all OVER them when they say something is "so gay."

I predict that 50 years from now people will look back on these days with the same wonder with which we view pictures of drinking fountains labeled "white" and "colored."

But I know if you want to be married and you cannot, it is very hurtful to be caught in a time warp.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNadir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-06-06 07:43 PM
Response to Original message
11. Sorry. I am not going to react to the freak G.W. Bush by messing with
the sanctity of my marriage.

It would be very easy to spin such resistence in twisted ways.

I support the right of any two adult people to love one another and commit through marriage. I am appalled that gay people do not share what I share. But my marriage is non-negotiable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demgurl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-06-06 08:43 PM
Response to Reply #11
16. My marriage is sacred to me as well.
My husband and I knew each other (and were best friends) for 13 years before we got involved with one another. This is the reason why it is so important for me to do something. We are only as strong as our weakest link and if they deny someone else the right to marry then I truly feel they cheapen my marriage. What entitles me to be lucky enough to be married while others, who are in love, are denied?

I can not help but wonder what divorce statistics are like in Canada. I wonder if a study has been done comparing gays to straights. Not that that would have any effect but I do not believe gays are hedonists who want to "infect" everyone with their gayness.

I value my marriage but how can we truly be happy if we do not do something to help others who can not marry? It would be selfish to give an attitude that we got ours and now they can go fend for themselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNadir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-06-06 09:01 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. Nobody is asking gays to "fend for themselves."
We all support the rights of people who love each other to bond legally and emotionally for life.

Because people are starving though, I do not go on hunger strikes.

I love gay people because they are people, and I resent bitterly that people everywhere, not just gay people, but all people, do not enjoy the rights and privileges with which I am blessed, but it seems to me that I cannot save the world by jumping headlong into schemes like this. I am not a sheep, I am a person, with children and with a wife to whom I have made a sacred private and personal vow. That vow is not political. It is special.

It seems to me that many gay people also have sacred, private and personal vows. These vows are extralegal and do not depend on government sanction. I lived with my wife before I married her. She was always special, and the marriage document only extended the matter to certain legal matters.

The issue of the urgency of the gay marriage issue is a contrivance of the Bushies to distract the world from the real issues, most of which are far more dire. Gay people have not had the right to marry for most of US history. I wish it were different, but changing that bit of unfortunate history immediately is not the most pressing issue before us. The attempt to define it as the most pressing issue does not issue from gay people themselves, but from the offices of George W. Bush. Fuck him.

I firmly regret that gay people are caught in the crossfire. If this abuse of human rights is not wrong then nothing is wrong. However, I will express my contempt for these restrictions in my own way, and my marriage is non-negotiable.

This amendment will go nowhere. I am not going to place my children and my wife at legal risk for a nonsensical Bush game.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VelmaD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-06-06 08:48 PM
Response to Reply #11
17. I notice that it's alway any two people...
what about me and my two boyfriends and my girlfriend...why shouldn't I be able to have a committment to all of them if I wanted to?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNadir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-06-06 09:18 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. Whatever you like. It's not for me, but do whatever you like.
I think you should check in with Orin Hatch, although I think he only likes heterosexual polgamy. But at least he's part of the way there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VelmaD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-06-06 10:03 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. get your terms straight...
what some Mormons practice is polygyny...that's where men are allowed to have more than one wife but women are not allowed more than one husband.

In actual polygamy...everyone would be allowed to have multiple spouses regardless of gender.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNadir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-06-06 10:26 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. You're right. It seems as if Orin will need a little more persuading.
That wouldn't appeal to me, of course, polygyny, polyandry, polygamy.

I'm a monogamist. I hope there's no movement to make that illegal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ldf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-06-06 08:08 PM
Response to Original message
13. i think that the best solution would be
if all our supportive heterosexual friends who were in relationships with the possible or probable intent to marry, would publicly say NO, WE WILL NOT MARRY UNTIL ALL AMERICANS HAVE THE RIGHT TO MARRY, it would work.

starting with celebrities, then political people, then average americans taking a stand. list everyone. make it cool to be on the list. repeat their pledge at every opportunity. make sure everyone they know, KNOWS why they are not setting a date yet.

it could actually become a liberal movement. a backlash, even.

but, talk is cheap, and few would ever be willing to walk the walk.

:shrug:

it's not like we gays will ever have the power ourselves to change it. after all, it takes a village, people! :-)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
titoresque Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-06-06 08:16 PM
Response to Original message
14. Yes it would help!
I think. Any tax accountants in the house? I know personally that the only benefit I can see by not being allowed to marry my partner is that we do not have to combine incomes. If you divorced and have children one partner could claim them and get a bigger return every year on the money the government missuses! Am I right?

This could hurt the greedy fuckers where it counts! Right in their pockets!

I think. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-06-06 09:21 PM
Response to Original message
20. i want civil union now. and i want to drop my marriage and get a
civil union. and nationwide protestors get civil unions. and then the foundation of marriage erodes, like the findues are so fearful of. give them what they want
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pauliedangerously Donating Member (843 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-06-06 10:43 PM
Response to Original message
23. That's a beautiful idea, but I wouldn't do it if you're happy with him
I'm already divorced twice and I think marriage is an overrated institution. I'm not having any kids either. I think that this whole gay marriage issue is a big crock of dumbshit for the genpop to dip their Fritos in.

Marriage is SECULAR. It's a legal binding contract. My wives and I arrived at mutually agreeable terms in our divorces and we totally respect each other. We had a blast, we grew together, and we moved on to what we thought were better respective futures.

If you or anyone else who reads this has a happy marriage, STAY MARRIED.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 01:06 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC