Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I think the WH is ratfucking Hastert and Specter. They are scared of them.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 10:56 PM
Original message
I think the WH is ratfucking Hastert and Specter. They are scared of them.
Edited on Wed Jun-07-06 11:01 PM by originalpckelly
These guys are horrible pukes who have let the WH gain too much power, but they are the only people who can really do anything to help our nation. That is the tedious nature of this relationship, we need them, and they only have selfish reasons to stand up and do the right thing.

We can only hope they understand their offices will soon become irrelevant if they don't do anything to stop this power grab.

The ratfucking is the weird press releases and leaks that in one case suggested Hastert was under investigation and that Specter was against having phone companies testify. Orin Hatch was the originator of the Specter bit, and it appears the DOJ is the source for the false information about Hastert.

The WH is manipulating our hatred of these men, so that we will bring them down, and they will loose whatever little credibility they have with the public.

We need to remember they aren't on our side, but we need them anyway. Be cautious with any criticism of them because you could be doing what the WH wants you to do.

All we need to look is the Plame affair to know how this administration discredits it opponents.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TheDebbieDee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 11:07 PM
Response to Original message
1. They are being blackmailed with the info
obtained in the illegal wiretaps. That's why the FISA courts wouldn't approve the wiretaps - the subjects of the wiretaps were political enemies or potential political enemies of our rat-fucking president!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Atman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 11:11 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. BINGO! Buy that poster a lovely beverage!
Why do you think they've had the taps going since BEFORE 9/11? They have the goods on everybody they need the goods on. And they're using 'em.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 11:09 PM
Response to Original message
2. Hastert & Specter Aren't Going Anywhere
Looks like you've fallen for the Rove shell game...creating sham issues and boogie men to divert attention away from the real issues of corruption, Iraq, oil prices and things that are really destroying this country into an election based on class, racial and cultural lines.

Hastert will bitch about the immigration issue, but it's moot, since he'll still push through the Paris Hilton Tax cut, continue supporting the unlimited funding of this Iraq fiasco, make sure any corruption scandals are hushed up or diverted and vote with boosh 99.9% of the time. Specter isn't much different as even if he doesn't like the draconian nature of this regime, he's done nothing to stop them...all but rolling over for ScAlito, dismissing the Plame fiasco and will vote with booosh only 90% of the time.

Democrats are forming circular firing squads as the passions to defeat DLC'ers who we may disagree with 50% of time time rather than the Repugnicans. Rove's created this "beat boooosh" game...that makes him the boogie man in these local races that energize that base and keeps them from staying home. Meanwhile the "mainstream" Democrats in California stayed home yesterday.

Yes, people are mad...those are the Repugnicans...but most Democrats I talk to are depressed...a big difference. Mad people will be sure to vote, depressed people won't. People are looking for reasons to vote FOR a Democrat and they're not getting answers other than "we're not Repugnicans". It's time for the party to unite and develop a straight forward message that can be easily understood and hammered over and over again...then to work with existing organizations to find the votes and make sure they're at the polls in November.

The GOOP has already put their '06 game plan in motion and I'm seeing another replay of past elections where they've got their base ready to rock while Democrats are chasing ghosts and each other.

Peace...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Atman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 11:10 PM
Response to Original message
3. Despite your lack of any support for your claims...
...I understand what you're saying (although some links would be nice).

Oddly, here is why...I just started reading The Da Vinci Code. Yeah, yeah, I'm the last person in America, but I wanted to know the "real thing" before I saw the movie. Anyway, the opening of the book sets up the whole history of the Catholic church, and how they made it a primary mission to take all of the villagers'/pagans' religious symbology and assigned demonic meanings to the various elements, such as the "pentacle" (star).

What BushCo is doing is the same thing, and can be traced back to their demonization of the words "LIBERAL" and "welfare" (look it up). Same shit, different era. It's manipulation of the public, nothing less.

I'd say your post about Hastert and Specter is the same thing, only different. They're trying to fuck with our heads. And my bet is, they'll ultimately succeed. At least in the short term.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lindisfarne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 11:53 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. No, I will be the last person to read it ...n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lindisfarne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 11:54 PM
Response to Original message
6. Specter makes strong statements but when the chance to act comes, does
Edited on Thu Jun-08-06 12:07 AM by lindisfarne
nothing. He's not going to do anything (and Hastert is a republican shill).

There was that whole business when there was discussion over whether some Repub. should testify under oath before Congress or not. Specter played his chairman card and said it would not be under oath. (sorry; can't remember exactly what it was although if someone fills me in, i'll wonder how i could have forgotten).

Ah yes. Thank google and wikipedia. It was gonzales.
Specter has been very critical of President Bush's alleged wiretapping of people in the United States and abroad without warrants. When the story first broke, he called the effort "inappropriate" and "clearly and categorically wrong." He said he intended to hold hearings into the matter early in 2006, and had Alberto Gonzales appear before the Senate Judiciary Committee to answer for the program (though Specter declined to force Gonzales to testify under oath). On January 15, 2006, Specter mentioned impeachment and criminal prosecution as potential remedies if President Bush broke the law, though he downplayed the likelihood of such an outcome.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arlen_Spector
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr_Spock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 11:56 PM
Response to Original message
7. What's a "ratfuck"?
Never seen that before :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Trajan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-08-06 12:08 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. Im with you .....
'Ratfuck' appears to be freshly coined .... though I suppose many a stuperous and cantankerous sots might have mumbled it accidently, on occasion ....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gauguin57 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-08-06 12:00 AM
Response to Original message
8. I can't imagine specter will want to run again in 4 years ... why doesn't
he just let loose and go back to being the Democrat he once was, and stand up against Bushco? If he decided now not to run again, he could spend his last years in the senate really accomplishing something for this country instead of chasing his tail.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 06:00 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC