Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Estate tax rate zero in 2010, one year ONLY... Hypothetical question:

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
elehhhhna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-08-06 12:04 PM
Original message
Estate tax rate zero in 2010, one year ONLY... Hypothetical question:
Say you're 83 y/o, reasonable health, and worth 30 million bucks and have 5 living heirs (offspring). If you die in 2010 your heirs pay no estate tax. After 2010 they get SOCKED for a couple hundred G's. How nervous would you be?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
SheilaT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-08-06 12:13 PM
Response to Original message
1. Worse yet,
consider the plight of similar families whose patriarchs and matriarchs have the bad timing to die in 2009, especially in December of that year. Now THAT'S a real tragedy. What they need to do is eliminate all estate taxes retroactive back to 2000 or so. Just think of the enormous refund of money all those people would get, and how much good it would do the economy as the newly-enriched heirs would put that money back in the economy. Not like the government which will waste that money on social service programs. Of course, if the government is spending more money on war-related things, surely we're all better off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
global1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-08-06 12:50 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. They May Need Some Of That Ice They Had Zagawri On......
and then say they died in 2010.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
survivor999 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-08-06 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #1
11. LOL...
I was thinking that some of these people who die in 2008 or 2009 may be kept frozen until 2010 and their deaths declared only then... I BET somebody will do just this...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-08-06 12:14 PM
Response to Original message
2. The thought had occured to me
though I doubt people would go for someone in reasonable health - there are still police investigations. More likely would seem to be euthanasia of very sick people - keep them alive until the tax free year, and then get rid of them. It wouldn't surprise me to see attempts to legalise open euthanasia by that time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elehhhhna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-08-06 12:58 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. A rush on DNR orders in 2010.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-08-06 12:30 PM
Response to Original message
3. Lots of people are practicing yelling "BOO!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
survivor999 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-08-06 12:39 PM
Response to Original message
4. Can that be changed at all?
Why the hell should people pay no taxes on an estate in 2010? Seems so arbitrary... I bet the rate of accidental deaths for elderly folks with such an estate is gonna go up dramatically in 2010!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-08-06 12:41 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Idiot Repugs wanted a bill back in 2001 or so that wouldn't look like they
Edited on Thu Jun-08-06 12:42 PM by w4rma
we're breaking the bank so that their budget out past 2010 would look nice for the public. So they made the estate tax drop by 10% each year until 2010 when it came back in full the year after.

So that is the reason that it phases back in 2011 and why it is gone for one year in 2010.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
survivor999 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-08-06 01:31 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. Thanks.
Been out of the loop on this... :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yupster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-08-06 01:13 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. The suicide rate will go up tremendously
just after Christmas of 2010 if the current law is not changed.

I go for a compromise of around $ 5 million. I think most people could live with that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Geoff R. Casavant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-08-06 04:06 PM
Response to Reply #4
17. It's not a free ride in 2010
The trade off in 2010 is that assets in an estate, subject to some exceptions, will not receive a stepped up basis upon the death of the owner as they currently do. Thus, when the asset is later sold, there will be an increase in the capital gain tax due.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
warrens Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-08-06 12:56 PM
Response to Original message
7. As nervous as a cat at pit bull farm
Bwahahahaha. Sweat, you thugs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sgent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-08-06 01:33 PM
Response to Original message
12. 20 million in assets
20 million - 2 million exemption = 18 million

18 Million X .55 = 9.9 million

Amount left to heirs if you die Dec 31:
20 million

Amount left Jan 1:
10.1 million
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PeaceProgProsp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-08-06 01:34 PM
Response to Original message
13. The people committing suicide in 2010 will be estate lawyers
and people who raise money for charities.

With good estate planning, you can completely avoid estate tax. Without an estate tax, nobody will need an estate plan (except to avoid state tax).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Geoff R. Casavant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-08-06 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. Close. So close. But not quite.
Edited on Thu Jun-08-06 04:04 PM by Geoff R. Casavant
Wrong on both counts --

"With good estate planning, you can completely avoid estate tax."

Nope, if the estate is large enough to be taxable it can't be avoided altogether, although good planning will allow you to minimize the tax bite and, if you are married, defer the rest.

On edit: One possible exception -- if a charity is your major beneficiary, then your statement may be correct. But who really wants to do that?

"Without an estate tax, nobody will need an estate plan (except to avoid state tax)."

Guess again. You have no idea how much money I have made over the years because someone, somewhere, wanted to save a few bucks by not hiring an attorney to do their estate planning. Even disregarding taxes, you have to admit that the orderly and efficient succession of property is a pretty worthy goal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SheilaT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-08-06 01:43 PM
Response to Original message
14. You also need to realize that
in any given year there are literally only a handful of estates that are taxable under the current laws. I doubt that you'd be able to notice a statistically significant change in the death rate in 2010. And just because the recent attempt to make the zero tax rate of that year permanent, don't think that they won't try again and again and again, and will perhaps actually succeed some time before December 31, 2010.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Geoff R. Casavant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-08-06 03:56 PM
Response to Original message
15. You're not the first to mention this
I actually read a legal article on this aspect of the current estate tax scheme, and the attorney who wrote the article predicted, with tongue only slightly in cheek, that December 2010 would see a spike in old people in hospitals hiring bodyguards to watch over their life support machines.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-08-06 04:16 PM
Response to Original message
18. Paul Krugman calls this provision
The "Throw Momma From the Train" Act.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lindisfarne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-09-06 04:32 AM
Response to Original message
19. There's still time to change the 2010 estate tax back to what it is in
2009 and/or 2011.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 01:57 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC