Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

CIA LEAK: WHAT ASHCROFT WAS TOLD: BY MURRAY WAAS

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-08-06 02:10 PM
Original message
CIA LEAK: WHAT ASHCROFT WAS TOLD: BY MURRAY WAAS
Edited on Thu Jun-08-06 02:14 PM by kpete
CIA LEAK INVESTIGATION
What Ashcroft Was Told
By Murray Waas, National Journal
© National Journal Group Inc.
Thursday, June 8, 2006

Then-Attorney General John Ashcroft continued to oversee the Valerie Plame-CIA leak probe for more than two months in late 2003 after he learned in extensive briefings that FBI agents suspected White House aides Karl Rove and I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby of trying to mislead the FBI to conceal their roles in the leak, according to government records and interviews. Despite these briefings, which took place between October and December 2003, and despite the fact that senior White House aides might become central to the leak case, Ashcroft did not recuse himself from the matter until December 30, when he allowed the appointment of a special prosecutor, Patrick Fitzgerald, to take over the investigation.

...................

Officials also told Ashcroft that investigators did not believe Libby's account, according to sources knowledgeable about the briefings, and that Libby might have lied to the FBI to defend other -- more senior -- administration officials.

Ashcroft was told no later than November 2003 that investigators also doubted the accounts that Rove, President George W. Bush's chief political adviser, had given the FBI as to how he, too, learned that Plame was a CIA officer and how he came to disclose that information to columnist Robert Novak.

................

In a briefing devoted specifically to Rove and Novak, sources said, officials told Ashcroft that investigators believed it was possible that the presidential aide and the columnist had devised a cover story to present to the FBI to make it appear that Rove had not been a source for Novak's column.


MORE AT:
http://news.nationaljournal.com/articles/0608nj1.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
fooj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-08-06 02:20 PM
Response to Original message
1. Another big story...
This, along with the Blumenthol article (Poppy trying to oust Rummy) and the Boston Globe article (20 million paid out to families of dead Iraqi's last year) are certainly damning. Too bad they aren't getting much air time. Wonder why that is?:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shakespeare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-08-06 02:21 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Hey, did you hear we killed Zarqawi again?
What scandal? :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
savemefromdumbya Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-08-06 03:03 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. most people don't even know who he is/was
if he ever existed?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
troubleinwinter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-08-06 03:25 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. Ya forgot the elections fuckups!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fooj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-08-06 04:25 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Damn. Can you believe that I missed that?
:spank:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
myrna minx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-08-06 02:27 PM
Response to Original message
3. This is a very good article. It is a great synopsis
as well as illustrating the total conflict of interest that Ashcroft had with the investigation. It's unbelievable that he did not recuse sooner. Oh--how much was shredded in the mean time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TankLV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-08-06 08:44 PM
Response to Reply #3
11. But yet, crisco johnny has time to cover up statue tits.
and investigate exposed superbowl nipples.

Priorities, priorities.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rageneau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-08-06 02:30 PM
Response to Original message
4. Great background article by a truly great journalist.
Murray Waas, Greg Palast, Robert & Sam Parry and a handful of others are the only real political journalists still on the job. If people like them were in charge of our MSM, our once-great nation could stand up, shake herself off, and be great again.

On the other hand, so long as our MSM is dominated by the Coulters and O'Reillys we see every day, she will sink ever deeper into the mire.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-08-06 03:26 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. the list should be longer...but shamefully for now the list is abbreviated
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
McCamy Taylor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-08-06 05:11 PM
Response to Original message
9. I didnt miss it. Ashcroft guilt is the reason we have Fitz. He tried
to keep covering for the administration too long, got caught doing it and had to name a real prosecutor to cover his ass ( as "If I was trying to cover for the administration all along would I now be naming a hard ass like Fitz to indict them all?"). Then he got the hell out of Dodge.

And Ashcroft, being a true member of the Rabid Christian Right, was probably the most moral sonaofabitch they had in that administration.

Sweet Al Gonazales is gonna be real popular with the drug dealers in federal lock up when he serves his time in Club Fed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jaysunb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-08-06 06:19 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Couldn't sneak this past you, huh ?
me either.
Gonzo AND Ashcrot are part of the conspiracy, and cover-up.
I remember another fellow that did this....AG John Mithchell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-08-06 09:17 PM
Response to Original message
12. Fitz!
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bleever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-08-06 09:22 PM
Response to Original message
13. A veritable treasure trove of info for Plameologists.
A few choice nuggets:

"Looking to undermine Wilson's credibility, Rove, Libby, and at least one other senior administration official told reporters that Plame had arranged for her husband's CIA-sponsored trip, casting it as nepotism."


We know, as the prosecutors do, at least two people who fit that title as an "other senior adminstration official" implicated in this particular act. Dick and Condi. Could this indicate that Condi remains a focus?


According to the FBI report cited in Libby's indictment, when Russert supposedly told Libby that Plame worked for the CIA, "Libby was surprised by this statement because, while speaking with Russert, Libby did not recall that he previously had learned about Wilson's wife's employment from the vice president."


Caught dead to rights, is how I'd translate that. If I'd heard something from my boss and taken notes about it, I'd certainly recognize the information immediately. Wouldn't you?


Rove told the FBI that when Novak mentioned Plame's CIA connection and that she might have played a role in selecting her husband to go to Niger, he (Rove) simply said that he had heard much the same information. According to sources, Novak later told investigators a virtually identical story.


Conspiracy: the prima facia elements seem to be right here. Further confirmation comes from Rove's paid spokesman asserting that Rove never did such a thing. :)


In announcing Ashcroft's recusal and Fitzgerald's appointment on December 30, Comey said that Ashcroft had made the decision: "The attorney general, in an abundance of caution, believed that his recusal was appropriate based on the totality of circumstances and the facts and evidence developed at this stage of the investigation," Comey said. "I agree with that judgment."


Witness the deft touch of the * appointee who actually did his job to honor the rule of law, both by prompting Ashcroft's recusal, and by appointing Patrick Fitzgerald. This man is one of the unsung heroes of the entire case.


One of the questions I'm left with is: what damage was done by Ashcroft's delay in recusing himself? While I don't credit Mr. Ashcroft with the intellectual firepower to advance the chess match himself, certainly his foot-dragging was used by other players to advance their cause.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-08-06 09:26 PM
Response to Original message
14. Waas has best the best reporter on this story hands down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bonito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-08-06 10:23 PM
Response to Original message
15. Kick n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 02:51 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC