Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Blunt Legalizes Gay Sex In Missouri

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-09-06 09:47 PM
Original message
Blunt Legalizes Gay Sex In Missouri


With the stroke of a pen on Tuesday, Governor Matt Blunt legalized gay sex in Missouri. Previously, under Missouri law, consensual gay sex constituted the crime of "sexual misconduct" and was punishable as a Class A misdemeanor.

However, HB 1698 which was co-sponsored by GOP Reps. Lipke, Dusenberg, Yates, Nathan Cooper, and Tilley repeals the provision making gay sex a crime.

Governor Blunt signed the measure in ceremonies across the state on Tuesday. Because the bill contained an emergency clause, the repeal of the ban on gay sex is effective immediately.

more . . .
http://www.firedupmissouri.com/node/4375
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-09-06 09:52 PM
Response to Original message
1. Fucking A. nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orsino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-10-06 11:37 AM
Response to Reply #1
29. LOL! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lildreamer316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-09-06 09:52 PM
Response to Original message
2. KICK for some good news......
Thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viva_La_Revolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-09-06 09:52 PM
Response to Original message
3. have I entered the Twilight Zone?
Is Rod Serling hiding in the closet?

:wow:

Is Blunt a Republican too?


:tinfoilhat:
did someone get caught recently?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-09-06 09:55 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. He's a repub and a dipshit
I'm not sure what the back story is. I think he's probably so stupid he wasn't paying attention to the bill he signed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-09-06 10:04 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Lawrence V Texas voided all sodomy laws nationwide
Missouri finally got around to repealing their ancient sodomy law, which was unenforceable the last few years anyway, because Lawrence V Texas rendered them all unconsitutional.

So this was basically a meaningless cleaning up of the statute books, so to speak.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluerum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-09-06 09:52 PM
Response to Original message
4. How do you "legalize" sex. It has always astounded me how puritanical
voyeurs take it upon themselves to dictate what sexual behavior I am "legally" permitted to engage in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nikki Stone 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-09-06 10:12 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. What a great question!
It's like trying to legalize the drinking of coffee.

:donut:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-10-06 02:50 PM
Response to Reply #11
40. If coffee had been the preferred beverage of certain unpopular immigrant
groups, historically-- and was particularly favored by, say, long-haired hippies driving around the country in VW minibuses-

you can bet your bippy there'd probably be a "war on Coffee" right now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-09-06 10:15 PM
Response to Reply #4
13. And I want to know how they enforce a law banning it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-10-06 02:47 PM
Response to Reply #4
39. People aren't allowed to grow certain plants, much less ingest them
smoke them or otherwise put them in their OWN bodies - in the privacy of their own homes, even. For some reason the government thinks it has more of a right to say what goes into your bloodstream and central nervous system than you do.

For some strange reason, that's always struck me as more than a little fucked up.

You think your body belongs to you? Ha. Try getting adequate pain management -and a doctor who isn't terrified of the DEA- if you're seriously or terminally ill, much less arranging a pain-free exit of your own choosing. Sorry, buddy. Your body belongs to the government- an outgrowth, IMHO, of thousands of years of Western religious tradition teaching that we don't belong to ourselves, we "belong" to "God".

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DaveColorado Donating Member (498 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-09-06 09:53 PM
Response to Original message
5. Lawrence V Texas
Edited on Fri Jun-09-06 09:53 PM by DaveColorado
The law would not have been enforceable anyways.

This is a symbolic win for gays in Missouri of all places.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
evlbstrd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-09-06 09:58 PM
Response to Original message
7. I read about this.
I find it somehow truly bizarre. Our state constitution was amended to discriminate against gays two years ago, but now it's legal for them to have consensual sex. And Repugs sponsored it. So, they can't get married, but they can have sex without going to jail.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-09-06 10:02 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. There are more details on the Fired Up site
It is pretty odd. But it's bound to piss off the talibornagains. And that's good :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
evlbstrd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-09-06 10:09 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. I followed the link and read.
The story only came out because AG Nixon announced he was dropping a case because the change was signed into law. Blunt is either dumber than we even thought, or is pandering for the gay vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-09-06 10:14 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. It's the gay vote
We know what a huge constituency that is in the show me state :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
REP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-09-06 11:46 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. KC MO Has the 2nd Largest Gay Community (per capita) in the US
Since you're in Johnson County, you may not realize that, but it does! KC - lousy weather, but not a bad city!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-09-06 11:48 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. There is a lot more to Missouri than KC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
REP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-10-06 12:09 AM
Response to Reply #18
19. Most of the Population is in KC, STL, Columbia and Springfield
And guess where the GBLT and Democrats are? Same places! I know, because I lived there much longer than you've lived in Johnson County, KS and I still have family in Missouri (hell, we built the first building in Westport ... we've been there a while).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-10-06 12:13 AM
Response to Reply #19
20. And how do you know how long I have lived ANYWHERE?
Agent Mike, is that you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
REP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-10-06 12:21 AM
Response to Reply #20
21. You've Posted That Info!
I have a good memory for hometown details.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-10-06 12:51 AM
Response to Reply #21
22. Ok, How long have I lived here?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
evlbstrd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-10-06 11:01 AM
Response to Reply #19
23. Man, you're old!
Are you Jim Bridger?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-10-06 11:16 AM
Response to Reply #23
24. I was thinking maybe that McCoy guy
You know - he had one of the first businesses in Westport.

Or even Chouteau?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
evlbstrd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-10-06 11:25 AM
Response to Reply #24
25. Man, I love Google
"In May 1834, a post office was established as West Port (two words), and John Calvin McCoy was appointed Postmaster. McCoy filed his town plat at the courthouse in Independence on February 13, 1835. Westport was incorporated on February 12, 1857. Lot #1, Block One, of McCoy's plat is the northeast corner of Westport Road and Pennsylvania. This historic site can truly be said to be the birthplace of Kansas City.

All three of the western trails - the California, the Oregon and the Santa Fe passed through the town on present day Westport Road. Prior to the Civil War, Westport prospered as the eastern portal of the western trails. The population probably peaked in 1858 at about 2,000. After the Civil War, Kansas City, which was platted in 1839 by McCoy, became the dominant community and Westport declined. It was annexed to Kansas City in 1897, but a court challenge to the annexation was not settled by the Missouri Supreme Court until 1899."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-10-06 11:29 AM
Response to Reply #25
26. Wow you probably have old cow pies in your yard
or maybe even oxen pies. Yum. . .

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
evlbstrd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-10-06 11:32 AM
Response to Reply #26
27. Could be.
I'd have to get past a lot of "dog treats" to find them, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nevernose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-09-06 10:17 PM
Response to Original message
14. Curiosity: Was heterosexual sodomy illegal, or all sodomy illegal?
And no, I'm not hinting at some larger point here. I just have a dirty mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
REP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-09-06 11:47 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. All Illegal
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pschoeb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-10-06 11:37 AM
Response to Reply #17
30. Incorrect, it only banned same sex acts
The sodomy law in Missouri, because of earlier Appeals cases in 1999, only applies to non-consensual sex. Missouri had a sexual misconduct law passes in 1999, that made homosexual acts a crime, and said law was enforced. This is what was essentially overturned by the Supreme Court Case, and now gotten rid of by Missouri's legislature.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cfield Donating Member (648 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-09-06 10:23 PM
Response to Original message
15. We're getting ready to move there!
And seeing as both my husband and I are bi, this could keep us legal...


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orsino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-10-06 11:36 AM
Response to Original message
28. Another Job Well Done for the Homosexual Agenda(tm).
Building a bridge to the twentieth century!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bonemachine Donating Member (407 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-10-06 09:57 PM
Response to Reply #28
41. LOL
Still a little behind the times, then?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
catmandu57 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-10-06 12:04 PM
Response to Original message
31. As long as it pisses off the fundies
I don't care the repukes have used and abused them for the last couple of years, I hope it pisses them off enough to get the fuck out of politics altogether.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-10-06 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #31
34. And this could contribute to their abandoning baby blunt
I know several fundie groups in KS are so pissed off they are working for Dem candidates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ComerPerro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-10-06 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
32. So Blunt sold out to the homosexual agenda
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-10-06 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #32
35. Sure looks like it
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
countingbluecars Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-10-06 12:55 PM
Response to Original message
33. Hi proud2Blib,
A teacher friend of mine is related to Melanie Blunt and attended the governor's inaugural events last year. She said the talk was all about how young Blunt was being groomed to run for president in the future. Maybe this is a move to appear more moderate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-10-06 02:05 PM
Response to Reply #33
36. Is that his wife's name?
She wore a fur coat to the inaugural and immediately upset the left.

Matt is the 47th least popular governor in the country. He can't run the state, no way is he a viable presidential candidate. I doubt he could take the vote in his home state. His dad's chances at re-election look bleak as well. You lay down with dogs (Tom Delay) you gonna get fleas. Roy Blunt is very flea infested now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
countingbluecars Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-10-06 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #36
37. So he is doing that well!
Melanie is his wife's name. She grew up in Middleburg, Virginia. I taught at the Middleburg elementary public school for several years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-10-06 02:41 PM
Response to Original message
38. Yeah, I think Lawrence V. Texas nullified those laws already.
Which doesn't meant there aren't still plenty of idiotic 'Merkins with nothing better to do than turn gays into criminals for having sex.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-10-06 10:02 PM
Response to Original message
42. whenever i see "blunt" and "legalizes" in the same sentence...
i have to take a second look.

no such luck...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 10:08 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC