Schema Thing
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-13-06 09:49 AM
Original message |
|
hold me!
:weeps: :shivers:
|
im10ashus
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-13-06 09:51 AM
Response to Original message |
|
Yes, my sentiments too. It's starting to get a little out of control here today. What with all this hearsay and whatnot. I say it will sort itself out and everyone is overreacting at this point. Just my humble little opinion.
How about a hug?
:hug:
|
Schema Thing
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-13-06 10:39 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
|
you're not the water guy, but you'll do in my state, lol. :pals: backatcha
|
WiseButAngrySara
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-13-06 09:52 AM
Response to Original message |
2. I've been looking for H20Man's comments on all of this! I hope he |
Sydnie
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-13-06 10:01 AM
Response to Original message |
|
We need some sage advice!
|
stop the bleeding
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-13-06 10:04 AM
Response to Original message |
4. I am sure he is putting something together as we speak |
|
we pm'd each other this morning and I saw him comment on a thread or two. So he is well aware of the situation.
His essays take time and this is probably one of the reasons he has been scarce today - the other reason is because he knows when to stay out of the way of firefight.
|
SheepyMcSheepster
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-13-06 10:04 AM
Response to Original message |
5. Yes, H20 Man your insight would be much appreciated |
|
Please give us your next installment. Thanks!
|
Schema Thing
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-13-06 10:38 AM
Response to Reply #5 |
7. Screw that, I just need to be rocked |
Schema Thing
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-13-06 10:37 AM
Response to Original message |
6. It would be funny if this thread became my most-replied |
|
and unfortunately, it wouldn't take that much participation! :think:
|
myrna minx
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-13-06 10:40 AM
Response to Original message |
9. Ha. I want a hug after you. |
H2O Man
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-13-06 10:44 AM
Response to Original message |
|
a few things to say about this later. But, for right now, I will simply say it isn't as bad as it might appear to be for those who want to see justice in the case, nor is it as good as those who are upbeat and happy to trash democrats for wanting to see Rove indicted.
We are in a struggle. It's a tough fight. There are going to be set-backs and disappointments. This is one of them. But it's not like Karl has emerged clean and stronger than ever. The White House had said Karl had nothing to do with the leak, and it has been shown that he absolutely did. For reasons we can only speculate about, a decision was made not to indict him in federal court. But that doesn't mean the Wilsons won't target him in a civil suit, or that we should not continue to focus on his role in the scandal.
|
myrna minx
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-13-06 10:45 AM
Response to Reply #10 |
Schema Thing
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-13-06 11:07 AM
Response to Reply #10 |
|
just havin' a little fun, H20. I look forward to hearing more from you on this. Thanks for all you do.
|
im10ashus
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-13-06 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #10 |
13. It's also worth noting... |
|
that this "story" was broken by Rove's lawyer and ALSO he stated:
"On June 12, 2006, Special Counsel Patrick Fitzgerald formally advised us that he does not anticipate seeking charges against Karl Rove."
Does not "anticipate" seeking charges. My comprehension is that Rove is NOT off the hook.
:shrug:
|
H2O Man
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-13-06 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #13 |
14. I noticed those words, too. |
|
It would be interesting to know if the notification to Luskin includes a letter that may become public.
|
myrna minx
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-13-06 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #14 |
15. The NYTs and the WP disagree as to whether |
SheepyMcSheepster
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-13-06 08:28 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
17. I look forward to it sir |
|
Edited on Tue Jun-13-06 08:29 PM by SheepyMcSheepster
Your insightful and thorough posts are always looked forward to. Please keep it up. You are much appreciated. Thank you.
|
applegrove
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-13-06 03:24 PM
Response to Original message |
16. There, there honey.. you will be okay. MOM |
|
Just kidding.
Really. This too shall pass. Bush at 33%!!!
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sun May 05th 2024, 07:47 AM
Response to Original message |