Norquist Nemesis
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-13-06 10:01 AM
Original message |
|
It's not on Fitzgerald's Special Prosecutor site. http://www.usdoj.gov/usao/iln/osc/index.htmlNo statement whatsoever. I want to see it.
|
Avalux
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-13-06 10:02 AM
Response to Original message |
1. Me too. Show us the damn letter. |
|
What kind of game is Rove playing here?
|
Norquist Nemesis
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-13-06 10:39 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
9. Luskin's the player, here. Has been all along. |
|
That's his job, of course. But American taxpayers are subsidizing Karl Rove's PR defense and the "traditional" media are ever so happy to oblige.
|
bigtree
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-13-06 10:03 AM
Response to Original message |
2. where is the damn letter? |
|
I'll be damned if I'll take cues from Roves lawyer.
|
Norquist Nemesis
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-13-06 10:39 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
LeftNYC
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-13-06 10:04 AM
Response to Original message |
3. Yup. I emailed the Wash Post, AP, Raw Story...somebody |
|
Edited on Tue Jun-13-06 10:05 AM by LeftNYC
must have asked to see it-right?
The Times doesnt have links to writers email addresses anymore...bastids.
|
Norquist Nemesis
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-13-06 10:34 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
7. You'd think "send me a fax copy" would be the first thing |
LeftNYC
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-13-06 10:57 AM
Response to Reply #7 |
17. The post is saying that a letter wasnt mentioned |
|
Edited on Tue Jun-13-06 10:58 AM by LeftNYC
|
bigtree
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-13-06 10:50 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
15. try our resource thread |
marylanddem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-13-06 10:04 AM
Response to Original message |
4. "does not anticipate" charging Rove doesn't necessarily |
|
mean he's off the hook...cat & mouse game going on here...
|
Norquist Nemesis
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-13-06 10:36 AM
Response to Reply #4 |
8. Yes. The only definitive term would be "will not be indicting" |
|
There isn't any other way to interpret that. But the "does not anticipate" means nothing.
|
Patsy Stone
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-13-06 10:05 AM
Response to Original message |
|
Edited on Tue Jun-13-06 10:06 AM by Patsy Stone
I want to see it too. Why wouldn't Luskin release the whole thing if it totally exonerates Rove? What does he have to lose?
I'm also still working through the word "anticipate". What does that mean? I think it means that as long as Rove is a good boy and cooperates, he's off the hook. Step off the reservation and we've got this stuff to charge you with.
Not saying that I don't believe there was some communication between Fitz and Luskin, just that the very best parts (for Rove) were released -- and there may be a few parts that are not so good PR-wise for old Rover.
|
marylanddem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-13-06 10:09 AM
Response to Reply #5 |
6. well put - let's let the damn letter out of the bag, Luskin/Fitzgerald |
Catherine Vincent
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-13-06 10:40 AM
Response to Original message |
11. I want to see the letter also. |
|
Not that I don't trust Luskin but I'd rather hear it from Fitzgerald.
|
Patsy Stone
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-13-06 10:42 AM
Response to Reply #11 |
|
You want to SEE it from Fitzgerald. :)
:hi:
|
Norquist Nemesis
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-13-06 10:43 AM
Response to Reply #12 |
|
Un-edited and word for word. :hi:
|
Catherine Vincent
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-13-06 11:05 AM
Response to Reply #12 |
|
In his first press conference, he kept aluding to "the people out there watching the tvs" wanting to know everything, well he should give us a brief press conference on this. ;-)
|
Patsy Stone
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-13-06 11:10 AM
Response to Reply #18 |
22. I would love a chance to look into |
|
that man's eyes again. A white-hat wearing, accordion playin' juggernaut of truth and justice. (Sigh)
The very thought makes me all melty... PF: :loveya:
|
stop the bleeding
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-13-06 10:45 AM
Response to Original message |
|
If we ever get to see it - it is probably something along the lines of "thanks or cooperating and if Rover continues cooperating then I(Fitz speaking) do not anticipate indicting pigface."
|
Norquist Nemesis
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-13-06 10:56 AM
Response to Reply #14 |
16. Or maybe it is "do not anticipate as of today" |
|
Until we see the letter... :shrug:
|
OzarkDem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-13-06 11:07 AM
Response to Original message |
19. Agree, where's the evidence that Rove isn't being indicted |
|
We only have Rove's attorney's word, right?
|
Tsiyu
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-13-06 11:08 AM
Response to Original message |
|
same here.
We are talking about ROVE, people. Would his attorney be any more ethical than KKKarl?
This is just another one of his fucking games. We should ignore it and wait for Fitz to do his job.
|
gratuitous
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-13-06 11:10 AM
Response to Original message |
21. Why are you all so cynical and distrustful? |
|
Has anyone in the Bush administration ever lied to you? What is the reason for such suspicion? My goodness, Karl Rove's paid mouthpiece said it; isn't that enough? I suppose you don't think there were any weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, either! Goodness me!
|
Norquist Nemesis
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-13-06 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #21 |
Patsy Stone
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-13-06 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #21 |
24. Why do you hate America? |
|
:)
Just move along... Nothing to see here...
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sun May 05th 2024, 05:01 AM
Response to Original message |