Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"Not going to leave chaos behing.." The US is responsible for the chaos

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
cantstandbush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-14-06 09:52 AM
Original message
"Not going to leave chaos behing.." The US is responsible for the chaos
in Iraq. Al-Zarqawi came because the US came there. Are we all going to sit by and just let Bush re-write current events?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-14-06 09:57 AM
Response to Original message
1. The MSM is just waiting for those little hot dog thingies at lunch
Truth, nah, it can wait another day.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-14-06 10:32 AM
Response to Original message
2. He will not "leave chaos behind", and I agree...
Edited on Wed Jun-14-06 11:09 AM by slor
he will instead leave chaos everywhere, as he has been doing. Think of it as a Worldwide Chaos Tour, rocking out a city near you!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-14-06 10:34 AM
Response to Original message
3. "First Chaos, then order."
It's a plan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-14-06 10:35 AM
Response to Original message
4. No, not behind...We'll bring it on a platter and serve it up! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
magellan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-14-06 10:39 AM
Response to Original message
5. Something else just occurred to me
You know how Bush** accused Saddam of being in cahootz with al Qaeda just because Zarqawi was in-country and had traveled to Baghdad before the war? Forget for the moment that Bush** could have taken Z-man out back then if he'd really wanted to...Extrapolating from Bush**'s logic, can we assume Bush** is in cahootz with al Qaeda for having let Zarqawi run amok in Iraq for so long AFTER the US invasion?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 12:25 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC