Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Presbyterians Think Of Changing 'Father, Son, Holy Spirit'

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-19-06 06:14 PM
Original message
Presbyterians Think Of Changing 'Father, Son, Holy Spirit'
Presbyterians Think Of Changing 'Father, Son, Holy Spirit'

POSTED: 5:09 pm EDT June 19, 2006
UPDATED: 7:11 pm EDT June 19, 2006

BIRMINGHAM, Ala. -- The divine Trinity -- "Father, Son and Holy Spirit" -- could also be known as "Mother, Child and Womb" or "Rock, Redeemer, Friend" at some Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.) services under an action Monday by the church's national assembly.

Delegates to the meeting voted to "receive" a policy paper on gender-inclusive language for the Trinity, a step short of approving it. That means church officials can propose experimental liturgies with alternative phrasings for the Trinity, but congregations won't be required to use them.

"This does not alter the church's theological position, but provides an educational resource to enhance the spiritual life of our membership," legislative committee chair Nancy Olthoff, an Iowa laywoman, said during Monday's debate on the Trinity.

The assembly narrowly defeated a conservative bid to refer the paper back for further study.

http://www.local6.com/family/9393768/detail.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
evlbstrd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-19-06 06:16 PM
Response to Original message
1. How about Rock, Paper, Scissors?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ComerPerro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-19-06 06:17 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. was wondering that myself
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rosesaylavee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-19-06 06:18 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. HA
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-19-06 06:53 PM
Response to Reply #1
21. They could join the USARPS!
http://www.usarps.com/site/index.php


I watched that on A&E even! :)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-19-06 06:57 PM
Response to Reply #1
23. Glad to know I'm not the only one with a mind that twisted
I was raised Presbyterian. Now I'm just Presbyopic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Burma Jones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-19-06 06:59 PM
Response to Reply #1
24. As an Ordained Presbyterian Ruling Elder
Long ago lapsed into -shudder- secular humanism, I must say that was the first thing I thought of.......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woo me with science Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-19-06 07:48 PM
Response to Reply #1
27. BWAH! Excellent! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
guinivere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-19-06 07:54 PM
Response to Reply #1
28. hee hee
Will they have to rewrite all the hymns and prayers?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ComerPerro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-19-06 06:17 PM
Response to Original message
2. And since liberals aer so godless and anti-religion, conservatieves
have no one to blame this on but themselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rosesaylavee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-19-06 06:19 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. Are Presbyterians considered liberal as a group?
Edited on Mon Jun-19-06 06:20 PM by rosesaylavee
I thought they were fairly conservative.

edit for spelling
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ComerPerro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-19-06 06:23 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Not sure, but my point was mainly
"Hey, conservatives complain that liberals are godless, so any changes within the church can't be blamed on us since we don't go"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rosesaylavee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-19-06 06:43 PM
Response to Reply #9
16. I bet there are some Presybterians here
I am a Unitarian Universalist so this is a mute issue with me personally. UUs just aren't into that trinitarian thing. We lost that argument, oh, about 1500 yrs ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wishlist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-19-06 06:43 PM
Response to Reply #8
17. Presbyterian USA is liberal (Presb Church of America is right wing branch
Edited on Mon Jun-19-06 06:48 PM by wishlist
Interesting news since I have attended services and a study group at a Presb USA church nearby and found the members to be very open minded about theology as well as lifestyle choices. I may go back and check it out some more, as they have outstanding music programs too.

Presbyterian Church of America though is a right wing splinter group (Ann Coulter attends one of their churches in NYC) which prefers male domination and does not allow women to be pastors, deacons or elders and most certainly does not approve of considering a female perspective.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleClarkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-19-06 07:24 PM
Response to Reply #17
26. I was shocked to find there were liberal Baptists
I think they are the American Baptists.

And there are of course liberal Lutherans. ELCA

Yeah, we're godless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ilsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-19-06 06:48 PM
Response to Reply #8
19. Yeah, they tend to stay pretty open-minded about
many issues.

Watch out for some of the other Presbyterian groups though. There are some that have "Evangelical" in their name, etc, and they are very conservative, and don't allow women ministers, etc. much less any tacit approval of alternative lifestyles.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freedom_from_Chains Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-19-06 06:48 PM
Response to Reply #8
20. Presbyters I think are generally liberal. At the very least
Freepers hate them so they must do something that makes sense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xmas74 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-19-06 06:55 PM
Response to Reply #8
22. They're considered to be mainline.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freedom_from_Chains Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-19-06 07:16 PM
Response to Reply #8
25. After I read your post I got to doing some surfing for a better answer
I found this little jewel that certainly echos my sentiments.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/huffpost/20060614/cm_huffpost/022942;_ylt=Am9XAPC2F5XmQK.BA79AaIqs0NUE;_ylu=X3oDMTA3YWFzYnA2BHNlYwM3NDI-

To further attest that Presbyterians can't be all bad here is the freeper reaction to this article.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1649287/posts

Both are really a good read.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niyad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-19-06 06:18 PM
Response to Original message
5. Maiden, Mother, Crone-the ORIGINAL trinity
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-19-06 06:34 PM
Response to Reply #5
12. Precisely. Then the Female (shades of Dan Brown, but seriously)
was written out, and somehow the Ideal Holy Family became a Father, Son, and...Ghost?? WTH?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spacemom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-19-06 06:39 PM
Response to Reply #5
14. Absolutely
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Matariki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-19-06 06:40 PM
Response to Reply #5
15. bah. that's a modern new age interpretation of 'old religion'
too much sloppy 'scholarship' by the likes of Barbara Walker. in fact it's a division that always bugged me, as if womanhood should be measured by their child-bearing age/ability. not to mention projecting that onto Deity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maxsolomon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-19-06 06:18 PM
Response to Original message
6. God, Son, & Divine Spirit?
Edited on Mon Jun-19-06 06:21 PM by maxsolomon
Jesus being literally the Son of God makes this exercise in gender neutrality kinda difficult.

If God made Mary pregnant, then "he" must have God-sperm. But Mary may not have provided the ovum, merely the womb. So God could (should?) be asexual & Jesus the result of Parthenogenesis or Gynogenesis.

But Jesus definitely was a guy. I think.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tocqueville Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-19-06 06:19 PM
Response to Original message
7. how about the trinity site...
Edited on Mon Jun-19-06 06:21 PM by tocqueville
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ayeshahaqqiqa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-19-06 06:29 PM
Response to Original message
10. My Sufi order
has had gender neutral prayers for years.

http://www.churchofall.us/prayers.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-19-06 06:32 PM
Response to Original message
11. Whatever imagery works is what ppl should use, as long as it helps
you get in touch with that feeling that there is 'more' out there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-19-06 06:34 PM
Response to Original message
13. i was hoping that before the old pope kicked the miter...
he would elevate mary to redeemer.

but many of us already refer to the holy spirit as she.

and god as well god and not father.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-19-06 06:47 PM
Response to Original message
18. Honestly, this is why people become Mormon, Pentecostal
and other similar religions. Many people want a church that knows what it stands for and at least claims to be consistent in those beliefs. The same way that many people want politicians who stand for something. If something was a divine truth 2,000 years ago, then its a divine truth today, or else it was never a divine truth.

But I'm glad to see what little is left of the Presbyterian church is moving in a more liberal direction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WoodrowFan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-19-06 08:00 PM
Response to Original message
29. here's the original PC(USA) report.
Edited on Mon Jun-19-06 08:05 PM by WoodrowFan
here's the original PC(USA) report.

http://www.pcusa.org/theologyandworship/issues/trinityfinal.pdf

and yeah, I'm a PC (USA) elder as well, though not currently on Session... I'll reserve judgement until I've read the report and the minority report as well (once it comes out) but my initial gut reaction was similar to Radical Activist's...

This is from a news story from the "Presbyterian Outlook"

“The doctrine of the Trinity is the summary of the gospel,” in declaring that God is love in three distinct but inseparable persons, said Daniel Migliore, a theology professor at Princeton Theological Seminary and a member of that working group.

Migliore told the assembly that the paper affirms the traditional names of “Father, Son and Holy Spirit,” but does not preclude other designations, “mined from Scripture,” that also “express truly but imperfectly something of the reality of the triune God.”

The report describes the “Father, Son and Holy Spirit” language as the “anchor” for Trinitarian images. But it also refers to other imaginative ways of thinking of the Trinity – such as “compassionate mother,” drawn from Isaiah; “beloved child,” drawn from Matthew; and “life-giving womb,” also from Isaiah.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 04:21 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC