|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
rucky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-25-06 03:39 AM Original message |
"Scalia Twisted My Words" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hekate (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-25-06 04:01 AM Response to Original message |
1. I can well imagine this man is horrified |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Erika (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-25-06 04:12 AM Response to Original message |
2. Welcome to the new conservative America |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-25-06 04:22 AM Response to Original message |
3. Scalia is the one Justice who can be impeached by law. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Senator (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-25-06 04:58 AM Response to Reply #3 |
6. The remaining "Felonious Four" can be impeached for stealing 2000 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CrispyQ (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-25-06 11:28 AM Response to Reply #6 |
17. You have my vote, Seantor! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-26-06 01:48 PM Response to Reply #6 |
19. I like the way you think Senator. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flordehinojos (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-25-06 04:37 AM Response to Original message |
4. can samuel walker sue the pants off of scalia? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rucky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-25-06 05:20 AM Response to Reply #4 |
8. It sounds like he's making the case for it... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flordehinojos (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-25-06 08:45 AM Response to Reply #8 |
14. i hope he goes through with it and i hope all the other bush appointed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Senator (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-25-06 04:51 AM Response to Original message |
5. Well, we can anticipate Scalia's response -- Vaffanculo!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aquart (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-25-06 05:14 AM Response to Original message |
7. We already knew Scalia and truth were strangers. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
xchrom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-25-06 06:28 AM Response to Original message |
9. more proof that scalia sucks cat shit. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
no_hypocrisy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-25-06 06:50 AM Response to Original message |
10. Scalia took Walker's work out of context, thus avoiding having to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
annabanana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-25-06 06:58 AM Response to Original message |
11. It typifies the poison spreading out from this Administration.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Backlash Cometh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-25-06 07:55 AM Response to Original message |
12. This has a remedy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tanyev (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-25-06 08:05 AM Response to Original message |
13. One more person's eyes opened. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leesa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-25-06 09:30 AM Response to Reply #13 |
16. You are so right! I never dreamed it would take people so long to see |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
UTUSN (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-25-06 08:47 AM Response to Original message |
15. and the Scaly rebuttal? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
intheflow (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-25-06 04:01 PM Response to Original message |
18. A twisted citation of source. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu May 02nd 2024, 04:52 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC