Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Faux Snooze rabidly broadcasting that the NY Times is

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
HysteryDiagnosis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-25-06 04:05 PM
Original message
Faux Snooze rabidly broadcasting that the NY Times is
Edited on Sun Jun-25-06 04:05 PM by 4MoronicYears
being investigated for exposing banking data filtering used to smoke out the terrahists. How much attention to the following did Faux Snooze afford?? I imagine it was less than none.

The memory hole is deeper than it needs to be.


http://www.counterpunch.org/floyd01312003.html

One of those cut-outs was Mahfouz factotum James Bath, a partner in George W.'s early oil venture, Arbusto. Bath has admitted serving as a pass-through for secret Saudi money. Years later, when Bush's maladroit business skills were about to sink another of his companies, Harken Energy, the firm was saved by a $25 million investment from a Swiss bank--a subsidiary of the Bank of Credit and Commerce International (BBCI), partly owned by the beneficent Mahfouz.

What was BCCI? Only "one of the largest criminal enterprises in history," according to the U.S. Senate. What did BCCI do? "It engaged in pandemic bribery of officials in Europe, Africa, Asia and the Americas," says journalist Christopher Bryon, who first exposed the operation. "It laundered money on a global scale, intimidated witnesses and law officers, engaged in extortion and blackmail. It supplied the financing for illegal arms trafficking and global terrorism. It financed and facilitated income tax evasion, smuggling and prostitution." Sort of an early version of the Bush Regime, then.

BCCI's bipartisan corruption first permeated the Carter Administration, then came to full flower in the Reagan-Bush years. The CIA uncovered the bank's criminal activities in 1981--no great feat, considering how many of its own foreign "associates" were involved, including the head of Saudi intelligence, Kamal Adham, brother-in-law of King Faisal. But instead of stopping the drug-runners and terrorists, the agency decided to join them, using BCCI's secret channels to finance "black ops" all over the world.

When a few prosecutors finally began targeting BCCI's operations in the late Eighties, President George Herbert Walker Bush boldly moved in with a federal probe directed by Justice Department investigator Robert Mueller. The U.S. Senate later found that the probe had been unaccountably "botched"--witnesses went missing, CIA records got "lost," all sorts of bad luck. Lower-ranking prosecutors told of heavy pressure from on high to "lay off." Most of the big BCCI players went unpunished or, like Mahfouz, got off with wrist-slap fines and sanctions. Mueller, of course, wound up as head of the FBI, appointed to the post in July 2001--by George W. Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
dogday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-25-06 04:07 PM
Response to Original message
1. Funny, you would think the criminals committing the
act would be the ones investigated.. Trying to turn this around...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thickasabrick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-25-06 04:20 PM
Response to Original message
2. Bwahhahaha - maybe they'll get some traction with this story
since they totally bombed on the Santorum WMD scoop! They are so pathetic it's funny.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Loge23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-25-06 04:23 PM
Response to Original message
3. What tomorrow's NYT editorial should feature:
A very strong warning, in detail, to all of their readers about the rapidly increasing encroachment on our freedom from this vile, treasonous administration.
Just to drive home the point, I suggest the highly unusual, perhaps unprecedented, placement of this editorial on the front page.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-25-06 04:28 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. The RW is pouncing on this but of course
not a word about the NYT and Ms. Miller's bogus reports of WMDs. Standard RW Hypocrisy!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HysteryDiagnosis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-25-06 04:48 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Dupe, self delete
Edited on Sun Jun-25-06 04:50 PM by 4MoronicYears
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HysteryDiagnosis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-25-06 04:49 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Next story on Faux.... Is Media Bias Hurting the Troops??? Well
if you consider the media's cheerleading in the runup to the invasion/massacre has helped to get us where 15,000 soldiers are missing limbs or have head trauma/brain damage, an untold number have permanent psychological damage and may be unemployable in the forseeable future and almost 2600 of them are DEAD, then yes, media bias has hurt the troops and

FAUX NEWS IS THE SINGLE GREATEST CONTRIBUTOR TO THIS REALITY IN THE COUNTRY.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-25-06 04:50 PM
Response to Original message
7. Rove is pushing his talking points hard. This has been a topic for days
now from the rwing hate club on AM

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-25-06 05:11 PM
Response to Original message
8. You would have thunk all the closed bank accounts and frozen assest
in their first year after 9/11 might have tipped al Qaeda off. So too the speeches Bush gave on the subject.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HysteryDiagnosis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-25-06 05:23 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. When you are full of sh*t.... there's not much you can say to
save your credibility.... this admin has NONE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 10:37 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC