Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Is the USA still in Iraq for honorable reasons?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-26-06 10:38 AM
Original message
Poll question: Is the USA still in Iraq for honorable reasons?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-26-06 10:40 AM
Response to Original message
1. America never was in Iraq for honorable reasons
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jacobin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-26-06 01:22 PM
Response to Reply #1
28. That one would have been my vote
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-26-06 10:41 AM
Response to Original message
2. never were
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fridays Child Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-26-06 10:41 AM
Response to Original message
3. never were nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smokey nj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-26-06 10:42 AM
Response to Original message
4. There was never anything honorable about the......
illegal invasion and occupation of Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benburch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-26-06 10:42 AM
Response to Original message
5. Never were. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-26-06 10:44 AM
Response to Original message
6. Still?
A presupposition up with which I do not put.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-26-06 10:44 AM
Response to Original message
7. There was never an honorable reason for this war
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greyl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-26-06 10:46 AM
Response to Original message
8. Hell no.
"Honor" is a serious word.
There are individual troops doing the best they can to uphold the standard of honor while being trapped there, but on the whole, there's nothing honorable about fighting arson with gasoline.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-26-06 10:46 AM
Response to Original message
9. After stabbing them in the back, we refuse to pull the knife out
Edited on Mon Jun-26-06 10:47 AM by TahitiNut
... claiming they'll bleed to death on the carpet. :grr: :grr: It's up to them to "heal" first. :dunce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-26-06 10:47 AM
Response to Original message
10. Only if depopulating the region so you can control the oil is "honorable"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skip Intro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-26-06 10:50 AM
Response to Original message
11. still? we didn't go in with honorable reasons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-26-06 10:51 AM
Response to Original message
12. they never were.
Edited on Mon Jun-26-06 10:53 AM by alyce douglas
....2517 American victims


We lost seven over the weekend.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Totally Committed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-26-06 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
13. We were never there "honorably"...
There is no honorable reason to illegally occupy a sovereign nation for their oil.

TC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
endarkenment Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-26-06 10:59 AM
Response to Original message
14. Bad question: assumes we ever were there honorably.
Consider editing the still out of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-26-06 11:08 AM
Response to Reply #14
17. I won't edit it because there are some people including myself...
...who falsely believed before we invaded that Iraq had some sort of WMDs.

I did not however think whatever they had could possibly be worth going to war over.

I can see how others though with less information could have been frightened enough to think Iraq was a threat to America and I will not belittle them for that. My mother for instance was really scared of the drones of death. Take into account she is about 80 years old.

Don
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
endarkenment Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-26-06 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #17
18. Then you should have offered a choice of 'never was honorable'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-26-06 11:48 AM
Response to Reply #18
24. Or you should start your own poll and word it however you want n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
endarkenment Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-26-06 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #24
27. If I were the only one with a problem you might have a point.
Oh well, never mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-26-06 11:40 AM
Response to Reply #17
22. Yes, well, you were all wrong, weren't you?
I don't see how that makes it honorable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niyad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-26-06 07:53 PM
Response to Reply #17
30. since you KNOW that the reasons given were false, then you were in
error in posing the question as you did, regardless of what you think others still believe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-26-06 08:13 PM
Response to Reply #30
31. Wrong
I am acknowledging that many Americans actually believed at one time that Iraq was a threat. Not because it was a threat. Rather because of the way Bush and his minions along with the help of the media were able to portray and convince the majority of Americans that Iraq was a threat using BS propaganda that we all now know were lies.

I am not going to belittle those who were sincerely concerned for our country and their families safety during that period for their errors in judgment.

I hold Bush and his minions responsible.

Don
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkansas Granny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-26-06 11:00 AM
Response to Original message
15. The US did not invade Iraq for honorable reasons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
endarkenment Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-26-06 11:03 AM
Response to Original message
16. Who the heck voted yes? nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mike_c Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-26-06 11:19 AM
Response to Original message
19. it was dishonorable from day one...
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-26-06 11:36 AM
Response to Original message
20. Killing for honor is an obscenity.
Not to mention that it's also a lie. Much like the "honor" killings of women in various places all over the world.

Honor is egomania with a "repectable" face.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-26-06 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #20
25. Read it again. For REASONS that are honorable
For instance defending ones country from attack is normally considered honorable.

This has nothing to do with honor killings.

Don
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truebrit71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-26-06 11:39 AM
Response to Original message
21. Flawed question. It never WAS in Iraq for honourable reasons.
PERIOD.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bertha katzenengel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-26-06 11:45 AM
Response to Original message
23. Still?
Ever? Nope.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ganja Ninja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-26-06 12:00 PM
Response to Original message
26. Is this a trick question?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vidar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-26-06 01:50 PM
Response to Original message
29. Honor & the US are mutually exclusive at present.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mayberry Machiavelli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-26-06 08:56 PM
Response to Original message
32. This question implies another statement which is untrue. As others have
pointed out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
misternormal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-26-06 08:59 PM
Response to Original message
33. Stretching the imagination...
... looking for the possibility of an honorable reason to be there, I would say no... There was never an honorable reason to be there in the first place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 02:46 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC