Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Has there been a single real filibuster since Bush* came to power?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-10-06 11:42 AM
Original message
Has there been a single real filibuster since Bush* came to power?
I know there has been talk and Feingold tried to establish one once but the "Democrats" wouldn't participate. If there has not been any how can any Democrats say they made real efforts to stop anything that has been going on?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Dinger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-10-06 11:45 AM
Response to Original message
1. Yeah, Remember The "Gang Of 14"? Well, They Sucked.
That was the gift that keeps on giving . . . . to bu$hCo. They ALL need to go.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-10-06 11:52 AM
Response to Original message
2. One successful in 2002 led by Kerry against ANWR drilling
Edited on Mon Jul-10-06 12:31 PM by blm
There was Alito filbuster by Kennedy and Kerry that came close. And Patriot Act filibuster by Feingold.

Big difference being the Dems controlled the senate for a brief time. Unfortunately, 9-11 happened and media went all out into protect Bush mode for the next 4 years.

http://www.alaskalegislature.com/stories/041802/anwr.shtml

>>>>>>>
The House approved an energy package last year that includes refuge drilling.

During two days of sometimes emotional debate, drilling supporters assailed "radical" environmentalists who have opposed drilling and talked as much about the recent turmoil in the Middle East and Iraq's suspension of oil shipments as about the refuge itself.

"There's an inferno in the Mideast and we're importing more than 50 percent of our oil," said Murkowski, arguing that extracting the oil in ANWR is a matter of national security because it will cut the need for imports.

Drilling opponents scoffed at that argument.

"I've learned a few lessons about national security as a soldier and a senator, but the mathematics I learned in elementary school prove that Arctic drilling won't make a difference for national security," said Sen. John Kerry, D-Mass., a decorated Vietnam veteran.

Kerry, who has led the filibuster against refuge drilling, said the United States has 3 percent of the world's oil and uses 25 percent of the world's supply. "The solution is not in the Arctic," he said.

If energy security was the issue, he said, Republicans should have supported his proposal, which was rejected earlier, to require increased automobile fuel efficiency.

The drilling issue has attracted intense lobbying by environmentalists who have made it their No. 1 issue. Stung last summer when the Republican-controlled House passed an energy bill that would open the refuge to oil development, they vowed to press the issue in the Democratic-controlled Senate.

>>>>>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
endarkenment Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-10-06 12:39 PM
Response to Original message
3. Wasn't Bolten filibustered into a recess appointment?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-10-06 12:43 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. No there was a threat of a filibuster so it never came to a vote
I guesss in a way they are almost the same thing. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Minnesota Libra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-10-06 01:08 PM
Response to Original message
5. There have been at least one filibuster and I think more..........
....that made its way into the media. If I'm not mistaken one filibuster was over an issue on the budget.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bryant69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-10-06 01:09 PM
Response to Original message
6. I don't know if they actually filibuster anymore
I think they make clear that they will filibuster, and the head of the senate, not wanting the embarrassment, doesn't bring the issue to the floor, until he has enough votes to close the filibuster.

Bryant
Check it out --> http://politicalcomment.blogspot.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 12:15 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC