Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

This has got to be the dumbest LTTE I have ever read...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
TheMightyFavog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-29-06 06:37 AM
Original message
This has got to be the dumbest LTTE I have ever read...
I've seen dumb LTTEs before, but this one is just beyond idiotic.

Note: Nancy Nusbaum is a one of our candidates for Wisconsin's 8th CD.

A question to ask: Did he fly a desk?

GREEN BAY — I think someone should investigate what Nancy Nusbaum's husband did in the military while he served in the Vietnam War. It would be nice to know what his rank was, how long he served, what years he served and whether or not he flew a desk.

I have a lot of vet friends who have shared a lot about their tours of duty in the Vietnam War. These people who served and actually fought for our country have my respect because they taught me the difference between combat and flying a desk.

I have no sympathy for anyone who served in any war where they were not involved in combat of any kind. Likewise, I do not consider a 3- to 6-month, non-combat tour of duty to be a hardship of any kind.

I am a very proud Republican who will not even consider voting for anyone who uses their service (or husband's service) in a war as a plea for votes.

Leigh Dudenhoeffer


Hey Leigh, you need to get smacked upside the nogging with the fuckin' clue bat, How do you think the military knows how much ammunition it has in a given theatre, or sees to it that the troops get paid, or analyzes intel?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TheMightyFavog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-29-06 06:39 AM
Response to Original message
1. Forgot to post the link.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EST Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-29-06 06:44 AM
Response to Original message
2. Some people are just stupid, dangerously stupid.
Dangerously stupid people are convinced, beyond doubt, that their worldview is beyond question. And you can safely bet they are republican. ugh!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-29-06 01:30 PM
Response to Reply #2
31. Oh, yes. That level of moral certainty
is invariably Republican. In his latest book John Dean was talking about the authoritarian personality and the attempt to study authoritarians on the left. The problem was that they couldn't find any authoritarians on the Americal left. They were all right-wingers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EST Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-30-06 09:30 AM
Response to Reply #31
39. What I find disquieting, seriously disturbing, is that
John Dean, an obviously intelligent man, is only now, in the intellectual maturity of his career, discovering some of the ways that people are put together.
It seems that most of the humans that are drawn to a liberal or progressive point of view have a generally more penetrating radar, usually assuming such an ability so common that it rarely deserved comment. Mr. Dean is to be commended for his epiphany and valued for the weight he places on honesty and his public stature, which gives him a bigger clue bat.

I would like to see a self-selected team of personality peekers, working backward from a fully developed authoritarian construct to early childhood, to see how the empathy tracks got so short circuited. It might give us a more scientific method of selecting or evaluating potential leaders. Forensic psychiatry?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-29-06 06:47 AM
Response to Original message
3. So tell us, Leigh...
Are you of draft age? Were you ever? Did you rush out & enlist & put in for the infantry during any of our many wars since 1964 or so?

And BTW, there are something like 10 support troops for every combat soldier.

BTW--"flying a desk" is a military aviation term. In the aviation branches, they have a lot more people fixing the planes than they do flying them. I think the airplane drivers kind of appreciate having mechanics, cooks, etc. around.

And BTW I'm an ex-grunt. 1st Cav.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-29-06 07:08 AM
Response to Reply #3
9. We'll need further evidence
that your service meets the high standard of moral purity and superiority that Leigh demands.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-29-06 07:27 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. I don't do moral purity
and not even superiority.

I guess I just don't make the cut.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-29-06 07:28 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. Leigh warned us ..... n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Why Syzygy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-29-06 06:49 AM
Response to Original message
4. Has she signed up for that 3-6
month TDY? No hardship at all. Here's the contract. Take off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkansas Granny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-29-06 06:49 AM
Response to Original message
5. I'll have to agree with you. This letter is pretty dumb. I wonder
if the author has bothered to investigate the service record of the candidates she chooses to support. I also wonder if she realizes that the individual soldier rarely, if ever, has any choice in what capacity he/she is assigned to serve. This "very proud Republican" has done nothing with this letter except to expose her ignorance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheMightyFavog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-29-06 06:55 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. In this particular congrassional race, It would probably be John Gard.
Edited on Sat Jul-29-06 06:56 AM by JonathanChance
Gard was born in '63, got out of college in '86. I don't recall him ever being in the military, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
magellan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-29-06 06:53 AM
Response to Original message
6. I expect she voted for Bush** however
I have no sympathy for anyone who served in any war where they were not involved in combat of any kind. Likewise, I do not consider a 3- to 6-month, non-combat tour of duty to be a hardship of any kind.

I am a very proud Republican who will not even consider voting for anyone who uses their service (or husband's service) in a war as a plea for votes.


The hypocrisy is a neverending deluge from the Right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
senseandsensibility Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-29-06 10:03 AM
Response to Reply #6
26. Oh, she obviously voted for chimp
Edited on Sat Jul-29-06 11:02 AM by senseandsensibility
and the sick thing is, she probably has memorized some screwed up talking points from limpballs explaining why chimpy's military record, and only his, is off bounds.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmejack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-29-06 07:02 AM
Response to Original message
8. No one wants her "sympathy", the silly fool...
"Anyone who served in any war and was not involved in combat of any kind" was fortunate, not negligent. If she had any knowledge at all about the the Military she would be familiar with that dreaded phrase "The needs of the service" which was all the explanation required for anything from extending a tour to reassigning you to counting widgets in Dorkland, Texas for the duration. No one asks the member what you would care to do, or if they do, they don't listen to the answer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-29-06 07:18 AM
Response to Original message
10. Okay, let me get this straight.
If you were drafted and didn't go to Canada (or join the National Guard --and went AWOL), or you volunteered, and went to Vietnam, (and you didn't go AWOL), your military service is invalid if you didn't kill or try to kill the "enemy"?

What warped logic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
union_maid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-29-06 07:23 AM
Response to Original message
11. I wonder how a medic would fare with Leigh
I was just thinking of someone I knew who was drafted, went to Vietnam, didn't want to kill, so he signed up for medic training. He served there for about a year in the middle of all the dangers that faced the combat troops. He just tried to keep them alive instead of killing the enemy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sarge43 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-29-06 07:40 AM
Response to Original message
14. Yo Puddin'
Edited on Sat Jul-29-06 08:02 AM by sarge43
A quote from The Oxford Companion to American Military History

The combat service support forces form the "tail" in the often-cited "tooth-to tail' ratio. In fact, the analogy is poor one. A somewhat better characterization of a field army as a living organism would be to consider the staff the brain; the combat arms, the arms and legs; the combat support branches, the eyes, ears, and nervous system; and the combat service support forces as the heart and circulatory system, which provide nourishment to the other elements.

Although the bulk of combat service support is provided out of direct contact with the enemy, these troops on the modern battlefield often become engaged in direct combat with the enemy. Soldiers receive basic combat training, and with the exception of army medical personnel and chaplains, are armed. No small percentage of the Medals of Honor and other decoration awarded for gallantry on the battlefield have been given to combat service support soldiers. -- Charles R. Shrader

Or to put it another way, on behalf of the following "desk jockeys" --

My former finance, a pay clerk, who was killed in Nam when his chopper was shot down. By the way, our children to-be died with him

My husband, ammo man, who suffers from post trauma. We're waiting for the Agent Orange cancer to kick in

A friend, female personnel puke, caught in the Tet Offense attack at Tan Son Nhut. Thanks to flying glass spent a lot of time having her face reconstructed

Another friend, female fire fighter, saved a man from a burning building, but also spend time at the Brooks Burn Center being made presentable again

The mess steward who during the attack on Pearl Harbor manned one of the ship's anti-aircraft guns after its crew had been killed or wounded

The eight nurses named on the Wall

Thanks heaps, you clueless bitch

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheMightyFavog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-29-06 07:51 AM
Response to Reply #14
16. Damn, I wish i could see you tell this person this to their face!
Edited on Sat Jul-29-06 07:52 AM by JonathanChance
An awesome resopnse to a truly asinine statement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sarge43 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-29-06 07:55 AM
Response to Reply #16
19. I'll let you know the next time I get the chance
:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-29-06 01:34 PM
Response to Reply #14
32. Maybe you'd consider working this into a letter for the GB paper...(nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheFarseer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-29-06 07:48 AM
Response to Original message
15. what about flying in Alabama?
or better yet skipping out on that to work on a political campaign?

Now you can swiftboat not only the candidates but their relatives.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sarge43 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-29-06 07:54 AM
Response to Reply #15
17. Flying?
Our faux CinC failed "to accomplish annual medical examination." AO-87, DAAF-NGB, 19Sep72. He dodged his mandatory flight physical. He couldn't fly any aircraft after that. He was from then on a (gasp) desk jockey.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Commie Pinko Dirtbag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-29-06 07:55 AM
Response to Original message
18. Wow! DO spread it to every military person you can find!
"I have no sympathy for anyone who served in any war where they were not involved in combat of any kind."

Way to "support the troops", bubba.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ima_sinnic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-29-06 07:55 AM
Response to Original message
20. yet the dumb@$$ most likely voted for AWOL *, who skipped out
of a goldbrick assignment
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomWV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-29-06 08:05 AM
Response to Original message
21. During Viet Nam roughly 1 out of 10 Servicemen Saw Combat
The ratio was constant throughout the war and it wouldn't surprise me a bit to find out its still about the same today - even with excessive contracting out of duties which SHOULD be conducted by GIs such as KP and all the other housekeeping chores.

As for the couple of months of service complaint, ask Wesley Clark about that one. As I recall he was shot up badly at about the 2 month mark of his first tour and ended up spending months in hospital recovering from his multiple and very serious gun shot wounds.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sarge43 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-29-06 08:27 AM
Response to Reply #21
23. Much depends upon how narrowly combat is defined
Spousal unit war story

As mentioned he was munition maint. 14 hour day, standing ankle deep in mud, loading Mk82s for transport to the flight line, only break 15 minutes wolfing down K rations or 20 minutes when the mini-monsoon came through and they couldn't see their hands in front of their faces. Usually too exhausted to eat, so stumbled to the hooch, fast shower, hit the rack. Half hour later the first sapper attack on the base, do the hundred yard dash to the bunker, attack over, back to hooch. By the third attack, "fuck this shit" and stay in the bunker, especially if an air strike was called in. He said there were many nights he couldn't make it up the hooch steps, just drop half way.
This, by the way, is how many "desk jockeys" earned their Purple Hearts, getting hit by flying shrap and other stuff. Then there was parameter guard duty three times a week, no enough APs.

Not Normandy Beach, but I submit it was combat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fudge stripe cookays Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-29-06 08:19 AM
Response to Original message
22. I'm expecting at least one person on this board to send...
the paper a reply including all the Repukes who had something better to do during the war.

Stupid twit.

Sarge, I loved your answer. And I'm sorry so many of your friends and family have to deal with so much fallout. :hug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sarge43 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-29-06 08:32 AM
Response to Reply #22
24. Thank you, fudge stripe cookays
Edited on Sat Jul-29-06 08:37 AM by sarge43
Compared to many, we got off fairly light. At least most of us are still here to bear witness.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
soup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-29-06 09:48 AM
Response to Original message
25. Is it the Silver Star that bugs her?
>Nancy and her husband John, a Silver Star recipient from his military service in Vietnam, have been married for 36 years and raised their family in De Pere.<
http://www.nancy2006.com/about.php

3. Criteria: The Silver Star is awarded to a person who, while serving in any capacity with the U.S. Army, is cited for gallantry in action against an enemy of the United States while engaged in military operations involving conflict with an opposing foreign force, or while serving with friendly foreign forces engaged in armed conflict against an opposing armed force in which the United States is not a belligerent party. The required gallantry, while of a lesser degree than that required for award of the Distinguished Service Cross, must nevertheless have been performed with marked distinction. Soldiers who received a citation for gallantry in action during World War I may apply to have the citation converted to the Silver Star Medal.
http://www.americal.org/awards/achv-svc.htm

Or maybe she's seeing red because of John Nusbaums' beret:


as seen here:
http://www.nancy2006.com/index.php

Her heros have always been conboys?

"I've been to war. I've raised twins. If I
had a choice, I'd rather go to war."
gwb
Houston Chronicle, January 2002
http://www.motherjones.com/news/outfront/2003/01/ma_217_01.html

>"I learned some good lessons from Vietnam," said Mr. Bush, who trained as a pilot but never served in Southeast Asia. "First, there must be a clear mission. Secondly, the politics ought to stay out of fighting a war. There was too much politics during the Vietnam War. There was too much concern in the White House about political standing."<
http://nucnews.net/nucnews/2002nn/0203nn/020314nn.htm

Nah, it's probably because Ms. Nusbaum's husband is a flipflopper - he voted for * before he 'saw the light' and campaigned against him:

At a campaign event with veterans here Friday at a railroad museum, Rassman fought back tears several times as he introduced the senator as his hero. Rassman was introduced by John Nusbaum, a Vietnam veteran who said he voted for Bush and the president's father twice but declared with a quiver in his voice, "I can no longer support the current leadership."
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A64376-2004May28.html

:banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sarge43 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-29-06 05:38 PM
Response to Reply #25
34. Took a close look at Mr Nusbaum's picture
He was Air Force pararescue. Those guys were medics who went in with teams to rescue downed pilots, often behind enemy lines, often air dropped in. Nasty, nasty duty. He earned that Silver Star. Puddin' better not run her mouth to a former AF fighter jock and Nam vet; he'll rip her a new one.

Hand salute SSgt Nusbaum.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheMightyFavog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-29-06 08:26 PM
Response to Reply #34
36. Yeah...
I thought he was an Army paratrooper, they wear Maroon berets, as well, IIRC. I can't tell from the pic if his uniform is Army or Air Force, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sarge43 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-30-06 05:45 AM
Response to Reply #36
37. Airborne wears red berets.
Definitely AF, check the stripes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-29-06 10:09 AM
Response to Original message
27. So she voted for Kerry and not for Dubya, right?
What a moran.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-29-06 10:17 AM
Response to Original message
28. so its safe to assume he was a Kerry voter?
:patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sarge43 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-29-06 10:45 AM
Response to Original message
29. One more thought, then I'll shut up
I'd like to ask Puddin' what she would say to the ghosts of Dwight Eisenhower, Chester Nimitz and Henry Arnold. These men commanded the US Army, US Navy and Army Air Force during the Big One. They successfully defeated formidable enemies. We owe them, among others, our collective ass. Here's the thing, all of them were "desk jockeys", never saw combat. During Number One, Eisenhower was a training officer - tanks. Nimitz and Arnold were staff officers. Of course, WWII and they were still flying desks.

There's only one thing that may be asked of anyone who served: Did they honorably do their duty as it was given to them to do?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niyad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-29-06 12:39 PM
Response to Original message
30. I guess that means that you didn't vote for the chickenhawk contingent,
right, leigh? what a self-righeous piece of hooie. get thee to a recruiter at once, and walk your talk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
B Calm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-30-06 05:58 AM
Response to Reply #30
38. But... George Bush gallantly protected us from an invasion
Edited on Sun Jul-30-06 05:58 AM by B Calm
by the Mexican Air Force... (until he went AWOL)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheMightyFavog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-29-06 05:25 PM
Response to Original message
33. kick for the afternoon crowd
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mnhtnbb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-29-06 06:35 PM
Response to Original message
35. I'm a proud bimbo-ass stupid dittohead who does what I'm told
Edited on Sat Jul-29-06 06:35 PM by mnhtnbb
which includes not thinking about what I'm saying, says Leigh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Opusnone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-30-06 09:36 AM
Response to Original message
40. I don't see that the argument is dumb
I would more celebrate a grunt over an officer any day, but I come from a famliy of grunts.

I personally hail any who have served the US honorably and not simply to kill or enrich themselves monetarily.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 07:44 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC