Sannum
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-08-06 12:14 PM
Original message |
Oh my! Sean Smith needs to get a life! |
|
He has been on MSNBC whining about the Lieberman site being hacked for the last 20 minutes and he is convinced that the Lamont camp did it. He is calling for Lamont to speak out about this, blah blah blah. He has no proof, but I guess Karl's dirty trick class at the Learning Annex was successful. As in, do something yourself and blame the other guy.
|
Oceansaway
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-08-06 12:15 PM
Response to Original message |
1. and buttlick lets him drag it on |
|
ugh....i'm changeing back to the movie
|
Skidmore
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-08-06 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
3. Matthews came out and asked him how he wants Lamont to be viewed |
|
between now and the close of polls.
|
Clark2008
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-08-06 12:18 PM
Response to Original message |
2. Is the corporate media letting anyone from the Lamont camp |
Norquist Nemesis
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-08-06 12:24 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
6. CNN just reported they've been "trying to contact" the Lamont campaign |
|
Not sure what that means; hope someone gets to Lamont ASAP to fight back.
|
zbdent
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-08-06 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
|
Or are they using the old "We tried to contact them" trick ... sitting in a soundproofed room whispering quietly "Anybody want to refute this?"
|
Fleshdancer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-08-06 12:19 PM
Response to Original message |
4. well of course they're going to blame their political opponent |
|
on the flip side, if Lamont's site was hacked wouldn't the first thought be that it was a Lieberman supporter? I'm not a fan of Lieberman but I could understand why his campaign people would jump to this conclusion and it certainly isn't a bad idea for Lamont to speak out against hacking.
:shrug:
|
Richard Steele
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-08-06 12:23 PM
Response to Original message |
5. If it was true, they could prove it in 30 seconds. They haven't=it isn't. |
|
This is all BS dirty tricks.
If it had REALLY been hacked, they would be interviewing someone from the webhosting company to confirm it was hacked. Have they done that? Have they made so much as a phone call to confirm this story?
Or have they simply parroted slanderous allegations blaming Lamont for an incident which never actually happened?
THEY lie their asses off- YOU decide!
|
Catchawave
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-08-06 12:25 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
|
The webhost was the first thing that came to my mind when Sean Smith was whining....on and on and on and on.....such Rovian whine it was too :cry:
|
Crankie Avalon
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-08-06 12:27 PM
Response to Original message |
8. So THAT'S why Lieberman is going to lose by 12%...his website went down! |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sat May 04th 2024, 10:38 AM
Response to Original message |